CO2 - We call it life | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 505 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
CO2 - We call it life
 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:24 [#01904758]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker



http://streams.cei.org/

Discuss!

(at least see the videos, they are hilarious)


Attached picture

 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-05-22 12:35 [#01904767]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



you call it poison, we call it progress.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2006-05-22 12:36 [#01904769]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



what the hell


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:40 [#01904776]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



is this for real?


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:42 [#01904779]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904776



yes... unfortunately...
read more on the background of the campaign here


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:45 [#01904785]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904779 | Show recordbag



kan du linke artikkel direkte?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:48 [#01904788]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



so.. then they want us to believe that what politicians want
to ban is exhaling and natural co2 production?

surely, the last time I checked, it was about excess and
environmentally damaging releases of the stuff...

It seems people who defend pollution are prone to using
weird arguments for their cause... I was at a debate where
some economy professor argued that "our environment is the
best it's ever been; people are living longer than they were
ten years ago!" (meaning he's confusing stuff like medical
technology, health inspections of food sources, etc with
environment).


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:49 [#01904789]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904779



wrong article... *-)

right


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:50 [#01904791]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904789 | Show recordbag



The page does not exist any longer.

Please note that international news articles are available
for 90 days only.


but ok.. this seems like something "they" could do...


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:04 [#01904804]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904791



looks like the whole wbcsd page is down...


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:08 [#01904807]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904788



yes, they want to make us believe its very costly, people
gonna lost their job etc. They just consider business
economy costs and not social economy assessments... and i
believe a change in the energy infrastructure, just would
generate new kind of jobs and room for a lot of new
innovation.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:12 [#01904810]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904807 | Show recordbag



well, it's true that there probably will be fewer jobs in a
transition period, but what I reacted to is that they're
portraying it like someone wants to prohibit breathing and
that lowering co2 exhaust will kill all the forests...


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:26 [#01904824]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904810



yes, there was no living organism before we start burn
fossil fuel


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:28 [#01904825]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904824 | Show recordbag



Indeed: Man was a silisium based life form before that.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 13:30 [#01904826]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



disgusting.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 13:43 [#01904829]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



co2 isnt actually poisonous. it doesnt react with
haemoglobin so you wont suffocate if you breathe it in


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:43 [#01904830]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904829 | Show recordbag



nobody's talking poison. they're talking damaging to the
environment.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:44 [#01904831]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



co is poison, though, right?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 13:44 [#01904832]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904831



no


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:45 [#01904833]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01904832 | Show recordbag



carbon monoxide? sure it is!


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 13:48 [#01904834]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



CO is. it phux u up.

co2 keeps the atmosphere from being stone cold


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 13:52 [#01904837]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904833



ok sorry i thought the lack of a "2" was a typo

soz <3


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:52 [#01904838]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904831



CO is a narcotic(relaxing) affect and it would choke you...
(CO2 has many of the same affects...)


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 13:57 [#01904841]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to thodob: #01904838



no it doesnt! CO2 is much more inert whereas CO is violently
reactive. CO reacts with your blood haemoglobin and screws u
up, CO2 just sits there and does fuck all


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:12 [#01904857]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



no life without CO2. they have a good point, but that doesnt
make burning all fossil fuels into the atmosphere a good
thing.

in one version of an ideal world, agricultural crops are
harvested for ethanol/butanol fermentation, or
biomass liquefaction. The plants fix CO2 from the atmosphere using
solar energy, microorganisms (yeast, bacteria) turn it into
alcohols and we drive our cars with it, making new CO2 for
the plants.

i agree with those movies, to a certain point. i think
people in general just yell NOOOO WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE if
they hear 'carbon dioxide'.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 14:16 [#01904862]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to JAroen: #01904857



yes!!! i would vote for you


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:16 [#01904863]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904841



please dont throw unverified nonsense around.
inhaling CO2 definately does more than fuck all.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:19 [#01904868]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904862



yeah, there are lots of interesting things to do besides
burning oil. too bad theres such a huge lobby in the USA (at
least im suspicious of that) who rather drill for oil in
poor middle east countries. but when the end comes, we're
not lost.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 14:20 [#01904869]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



ha, didnt actually know it actively had a negative affect.


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:22 [#01904872]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904857



yes, i agree!

there would always be CO2 and we are not going to die
because of it, it would just be very very expensive to avoid
disasters and saving human lifes. But hell yeah, why should
older generations care? Its us young who have to pay the
bill i 2050..


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:23 [#01904875]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904868



yes, its much cheaper to start a war to secure the energy
supply, than increase the efficiency in the system... or?


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:29 [#01904887]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to thodob: #01904875



hahaha, sure lets fight the fucking world for oil!

in fact these things im jabbering about are ancient, butanol
fermentation has been intensively researched during the oil
crisis and during WO II (i think). There are already some
biomass liquefaction plants running, theres a commercially
operating plant turning turkey waste into diesel.

bah the world sucks, and in one persons life you cant make
much of a difference.. but every little bit helps.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 14:30 [#01904889]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



i heard they run cars off ethanol in brazil - never been
bothered to follow it up. sounds like a good idea


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:34 [#01904893]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904889



yes, off the top of my head 50% of the countries fuel
economy runs off ethanol fermented from sugar cane. Downside
is the loss of biodiversity, the country is riddled with
sugar fields so no more diverse vegetation. They drive these
funny dual fuel cars that run on gasoline and ethanol, so
you can buy whichever is cheaper

also from what ive heard, brazilians are rather stupid so
they lack the trading skills to export this technology
abroad. what a load of cack.

wow im really rambling on tonight. im doing something about
renewable energy sources for uni..


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:38 [#01904902]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904887



there is also those kind of plants (feedstock recycling)
plants in germany. But expensive and not the most
environment friendly solution to the waste problems (but
better than landfilling..)


 

offline thodob from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:40 [#01904906]
Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904889



Yes, biodiesels are also coming to europe now..


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 15:25 [#01904954]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904889 | Show recordbag



oh, wait, right.. you're some sort of fossil person! I just
want to know (if you know, that is) if that professor could
somehow have backed up his claims (that our environment
today is better than it's ever been) or if your sediment
thingies show otherwise if those things show anything like
that at all and if that's really what you do. I may be
confused.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 15:27 [#01904957]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904893 | Show recordbag



there's some stuff like that going on in sweden too... I
can't remember exactly, but they used lots of their garbage
for creating fuel of some sort for some hybrid-ish cars that
run off both that fuel and gasoline.. I think they may have
some thing going with wood...


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 15:32 [#01904964]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904954



Zeng?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 15:36 [#01904967]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904964 | Show recordbag



THE BORG!!!!!!!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-05-22 16:12 [#01904979]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



You know, there's no absolute proof that human activity is
causing global warming. It's only one among several
competing hypotheses.


 


Messageboard index