|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:24 [#01904758] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | http://streams.cei.org/ 
 Discuss!
 
 (at least see the videos, they are hilarious)
 
 
 
 | 
        |  | Attached picture | 
	
	 |  | 
   | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  chaosmachine
             from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-05-22 12:35 [#01904767] Points: 2330 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | you call it poison, we call it progress. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  vlari
             from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2006-05-22 12:36 [#01904769] Points: 13915 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | what the hell 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:40 [#01904776] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | is this for real? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:42 [#01904779] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904776
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes... unfortunately... read more on the background of the campaign here
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:45 [#01904785] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904779 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | kan du linke artikkel direkte? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:48 [#01904788] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | so.. then they want us to believe that what politicians want to ban is exhaling and natural co2 production?
 
 surely, the last time I checked, it was about excess and
 environmentally damaging releases of the stuff...
 
 It seems people who defend pollution are prone to using
 weird arguments for their cause... I was at a debate where
 some economy professor argued that "our environment is the
 best it's ever been; people are living longer than they were
 ten years ago!" (meaning he's confusing stuff like medical
 technology, health inspections of food sources, etc with
 environment).
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:49 [#01904789] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904779
 | 
| 
     
 
 | wrong article... *-) 
 right
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 12:50 [#01904791] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904789 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | The page does not exist any longer. 
 Please note that international news articles are available
 for 90 days only.
 
 but ok.. this seems like something "they" could do...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:04 [#01904804] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904791
 | 
| 
     
 
 | looks like the whole wbcsd page is down... 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:08 [#01904807] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904788
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, they want to make us believe its very costly, people gonna lost their job etc. They just consider business
 economy costs and not social economy assessments... and i
 believe a change in the energy infrastructure, just would
 generate new kind of jobs and room for a lot of new
 innovation.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:12 [#01904810] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904807 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | well, it's true that there probably will be fewer jobs in a transition period, but what I reacted to is that they're
 portraying it like someone wants to prohibit breathing and
 that lowering co2 exhaust will kill all the forests...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:26 [#01904824] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904810
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, there was no living organism before we start burn fossil fuel
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:28 [#01904825] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to thodob: #01904824 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Indeed: Man was a silisium based life form before that. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 13:30 [#01904826] Points: 12878 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | disgusting. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 13:43 [#01904829] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | co2 isnt actually poisonous. it doesnt react with haemoglobin so you wont suffocate if you breathe it in
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:43 [#01904830] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904829 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | nobody's talking poison. they're talking damaging to the environment.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:44 [#01904831] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | co is poison, though, right? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 13:44 [#01904832] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904831
 | 
| 
     
 
 | no 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:45 [#01904833] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01904832 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | carbon monoxide? sure it is! 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 13:48 [#01904834] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | CO is. it phux u up. 
 co2 keeps the atmosphere from being stone cold
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 13:52 [#01904837] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904833
 | 
| 
     
 
 | ok sorry i thought the lack of a "2" was a typo 
 soz <3
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 13:52 [#01904838] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904831
 | 
| 
     
 
 | CO is a narcotic(relaxing) affect and it would choke you... (CO2 has many of the same affects...)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 13:57 [#01904841] Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to thodob: #01904838
 | 
| 
     
 
 | no it doesnt! CO2 is much more inert whereas CO is violently reactive. CO reacts with your blood haemoglobin and screws u
 up, CO2 just sits there and does fuck all
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JAroen
             from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:12 [#01904857] Points: 16065 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | no life without CO2. they have a good point, but that doesnt make burning all fossil fuels into the atmosphere a good
 thing.
 
 in one version of an ideal world, agricultural crops are
 harvested for ethanol/butanol fermentation, or
 biomass liquefaction. The plants fix CO2 from the atmosphere using
 solar energy, microorganisms (yeast, bacteria) turn it into
 alcohols and we drive our cars with it, making new CO2 for
 the plants.
 
 i agree with those movies, to a certain point. i think
 people in general just yell NOOOO WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE if
 they hear 'carbon dioxide'.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 14:16 [#01904862] Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to JAroen: #01904857
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes!!! i would vote for you 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JAroen
             from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:16 [#01904863] Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904841
 | 
| 
     
 
 | please dont throw unverified nonsense around. inhaling CO2 definately does more than fuck all.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JAroen
             from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:19 [#01904868] Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904862
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yeah, there are lots of interesting things to do besides burning oil. too bad theres such a huge lobby in the USA (at
 least im suspicious of that) who rather drill for oil in
 poor middle east countries. but when the end comes, we're
 not lost.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 14:20 [#01904869] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | ha, didnt actually know it actively had a negative affect. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:22 [#01904872] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904857
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, i agree! 
 there would always be CO2 and we are not going to die
 because of it, it would just be very very expensive to avoid
 disasters and saving human lifes. But hell yeah, why should
 older generations care? Its us young who have to pay the
 bill i 2050..
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:23 [#01904875] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904868
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, its much cheaper to start a war to secure the energy supply, than increase the efficiency in the system... or?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JAroen
             from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:29 [#01904887] Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to thodob: #01904875
 | 
| 
     
 
 | hahaha, sure lets fight the fucking world for oil! 
 in fact these things im jabbering about are ancient, butanol
 fermentation has been intensively researched during the oil
 crisis and during WO II (i think). There are already some
 biomass liquefaction plants running, theres a commercially
 operating plant turning turkey waste into diesel.
 
 bah the world sucks, and in one persons life you cant make
 much of a difference.. but every little bit helps.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 14:30 [#01904889] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i heard they run cars off ethanol in brazil - never been bothered to follow it up. sounds like a good idea
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JAroen
             from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 14:34 [#01904893] Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904889
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, off the top of my head 50% of the countries fuel economy runs off ethanol fermented from sugar cane. Downside
 is the loss of biodiversity, the country is riddled with
 sugar fields so no more diverse vegetation. They drive these
 funny dual fuel cars that run on gasoline and ethanol, so
 you can buy whichever is cheaper
 
 also from what ive heard, brazilians are rather stupid so
 they lack the trading skills to export this technology
 abroad. what a load of cack.
 
 wow im really rambling on tonight. im doing something about
 renewable energy sources for uni..
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:38 [#01904902] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904887
 | 
| 
     
 
 | there is also those kind of plants (feedstock recycling) plants in germany. But expensive and not the most
 environment friendly solution to the waste problems (but
 better than landfilling..)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thodob
             from Bergen (Norway) on 2006-05-22 14:40 [#01904906] Points: 2143 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904889
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Yes, biodiesels are also coming to europe now.. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 15:25 [#01904954] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01904889 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | oh, wait, right.. you're some sort of fossil person! I just want to know (if you know, that is) if that professor could
 somehow have backed up his claims (that our environment
 today is better than it's ever been) or if your sediment
 thingies show otherwise if those things show anything like
 that at all and if that's really what you do. I may be
 confused.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 15:27 [#01904957] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904893 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | there's some stuff like that going on in sweden too... I can't remember exactly, but they used lots of their garbage
 for creating fuel of some sort for some hybrid-ish cars that
 run off both that fuel and gasoline.. I think they may have
 some thing going with wood...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JAroen
             from the pineal gland on 2006-05-22 15:32 [#01904964] Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904954
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Zeng? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-22 15:36 [#01904967] Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01904964 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | THE BORG!!!!!!! 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-05-22 16:12 [#01904979] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | You know, there's no absolute proof that human activity is causing global warming. It's only one among several
 competing hypotheses.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |