|
|
swift_jams
from big sky on 2006-04-20 13:54 [#01883481]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker
|
|
For a music project a friend is doing. Space Kids!
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2006-04-20 13:59 [#01883486]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
it seems like it could be a tshirt.
I give it a
C+
|
|
big
from lsg on 2006-04-20 14:01 [#01883487]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
it's cute, the letters are cute
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2006-04-20 14:04 [#01883488]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Would be a nice shirt indeed: B.
|
|
swift_jams
from big sky on 2006-04-20 14:04 [#01883489]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01883487
|
|
You're cute.
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2006-04-20 14:07 [#01883491]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker
|
|
Nice one mate!
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
chambre noire
from Iceland on 2006-04-20 14:51 [#01883511]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker
|
|
nice! but i'd had a kid in a astronaut suite
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2006-04-20 14:56 [#01883514]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker
|
|
click here for results
|
|
Vader
from € Lisbon, PT on 2006-04-20 16:30 [#01883601]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker
|
|
4/5 I think the feathering on the suit could have been placed and drawn more carefully so that it doesn't look like a photoshop filter.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2006-04-20 16:33 [#01883608]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01883514
|
|
funny ;-)
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-04-20 18:49 [#01883717]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker
|
|
we dont actually need to review every little fucking piece you create dont we?
|
|
-V-
from Ensenada Drive on 2006-04-20 19:22 [#01883749]
Points: 1452 Status: Lurker | Followup to swift_jams: #01883481
|
|
Your original design was close to perfection, but after careful consideration of the elements of design, I was able to improve upon it. My main concern was the balance of the image as a whole. I felt perhaps the image of the spaceman was a tad too low and the text maybe a little too high; in other words, I felt that the area could have been used more efficiently.
Now look carefully at my changes I have posted in the image below. You may not notice them at first, but don't let that become frustration - look more closely.
I'm sure you'll see, after some time, that I have, in fact, moved the spaceman up higher to get rid of some of that unsightly open space. In order to compensate for the new open space at the bottom, I have also elongated the spaceman's legs - this change, if I do say so myself, was brilliant in its simplicity. Now, the composition is perfect.
You need not credit me for my help.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2006-04-20 19:23 [#01883752]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2006-04-21 00:18 [#01883793]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker | Followup to -V-: #01883749
|
|
wow that is the sign of a true design professional. you looked at the situation, considered the information and acted accordingly. With positive results once more, good job.
PS. I like the original image/idea. Very appealing.
|
|
Messageboard index
|