Counting | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 176 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613447
Today 0
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index | Topic is closed
Counting
 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:35 [#00111728]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



1


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:36 [#00111731]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



2


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:36 [#00111732]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



3


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:37 [#00111733]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



7?


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:37 [#00111734]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



c

sorry


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-04 23:38 [#00111736]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular



...4. sh*t!! fell for that one!! How long until Phob
scraps this one? }}:>


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2002-03-04 23:39 [#00111739]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



counting your points go up?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:39 [#00111741]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to RobE: #00111736



hes not online!
quick! nows our chance to make useless topics!


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-03-04 23:42 [#00111748]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i don't want to get involved!

...........................................................
...................doh!!!


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:43 [#00111752]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMinal: #00111741



i've been doing that all along!!! ;)


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:48 [#00111758]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



Does any one want an indepth conversation on the merits of
the colour Yellow?


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2002-03-04 23:50 [#00111761]
Points: 3377 Status: Regular



36454636945643645643987986793469638576493876549385446982376
877398447645174697794776447647793477.2654256464


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:50 [#00111762]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00111758



i find it's lack of blue compelling.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:51 [#00111768]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



But it is so easy to see


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:54 [#00111772]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00111768



yes, but are you acquainted with red? now that's what i call
seeable.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:58 [#00111782]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



I have heard rumours of red and I think I saw it on the side
of the road, captured in a octigon with STOP written over it


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:02 [#00111792]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



yes, although i think it's a hexagon. they wanted to use
yellow, but they succumbed to the wishes of likers of red.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:03 [#00111796]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



Yellow spoiled by red is called orange. wierd


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:05 [#00111802]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



you'd think they'd call it redyel


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:07 [#00111805]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



I prefer yelred


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:11 [#00111813]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



however you cannot underestimate the power of being blue
when you want to be red


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:12 [#00111817]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



Blue is called green when greeted by yellow.
"Bluyel" or "yelblu"
You decide!


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:14 [#00111823]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



blullow


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111826]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



redlow?


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111827]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



I like it!!!



 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111828]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



Both of them!!


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-05 00:54 [#00111876]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



My friend's theory on the color grey:

"I beleive that the colour gray is actually a hue not
visible to the human eye. The human eye therefore
interprets gray as a colorless shade. If we are able to see
only a small part of the spectrum, then surely there are
colors the human eye can see which lack both chroma and hue,
such as gray. The properties of this colour would seem to
suggest that it is indeed a new unclassified colour."



 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:57 [#00111879]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to xlr: #00111876



i wouldn't put any money on ur friends theory ; )


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:58 [#00111880]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



actually, wouldn't grey be a mixture of colours?
because thats what white is, and grey is just less white


 

offline Vader from € Lisbon, PT on 2002-03-05 00:59 [#00111881]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker



Let me test:

[i]Vader[i]


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-03-05 01:03 [#00111886]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'm proud not to have posted on this horrible, spam filled
piece of crap.

But it's too late to be proud NOW. :-(


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-05 01:06 [#00111888]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



hehe. i dont trust his theory either. he also tried to
prove the existence of -0.


 

offline Vader from € Lisbon, PT on 2002-03-05 01:19 [#00111894]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker



2nd try hope it works:
[i]vader[/i]

or else..............I´m going to sleep!


 

offline Vader from € Lisbon, PT on 2002-03-05 01:25 [#00111899]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker



Bhah! It didn´t work (italic letters) well I guess its
sleep time (smart thing not to watch all that rotten
madness)
Nite everyone and keep counting! (whatever you were
counting)


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 06:14 [#00112075]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



counting is a very interesting concept. For things to be
counted, they need to be similar... or do they? This gets
into music concepts for me... and maybe music is just a
manifestation of something on a higher level, it has to do
with symmetry. You have to define what you are counting, and
I suppose there must be some symmetry among all the things
you group together to count. You can have five ostriches,
that's simple enough, until you think that each ostriche is
a seperate individual. I can't quite put my finger on what
I'm trying to say. What if you have 5 completely different
things? The only similarity they have is that they are
different. You can say you have 5 "objects", a vague word. I
think the mind categorizes stuff by symmetry. I don't know
what I'm talking about.


 


Messageboard index