|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:35 [#00111728]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
1
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:36 [#00111731]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
2
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:36 [#00111732]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
3
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:37 [#00111733]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
7?
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:37 [#00111734]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker
|
|
c
sorry
|
|
RobE
from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-04 23:38 [#00111736]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular
|
|
...4. sh*t!! fell for that one!! How long until Phob scraps this one? }}:>
|
|
Xanatos
from New York City (United States) on 2002-03-04 23:39 [#00111739]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
counting your points go up?
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:39 [#00111741]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to RobE: #00111736
|
|
hes not online! quick! nows our chance to make useless topics!
|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-03-04 23:42 [#00111748]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i don't want to get involved!
........................................................... ...................doh!!!
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:43 [#00111752]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMinal: #00111741
|
|
i've been doing that all along!!! ;)
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:48 [#00111758]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
Does any one want an indepth conversation on the merits of the colour Yellow?
|
|
hevquip
from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2002-03-04 23:50 [#00111761]
Points: 3377 Status: Regular
|
|
36454636945643645643987986793469638576493876549385446982376 877398447645174697794776447647793477.2654256464
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:50 [#00111762]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00111758
|
|
i find it's lack of blue compelling.
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:51 [#00111768]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
But it is so easy to see
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-04 23:54 [#00111772]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00111768
|
|
yes, but are you acquainted with red? now that's what i call seeable.
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-04 23:58 [#00111782]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
I have heard rumours of red and I think I saw it on the side of the road, captured in a octigon with STOP written over it
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:02 [#00111792]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker
|
|
yes, although i think it's a hexagon. they wanted to use yellow, but they succumbed to the wishes of likers of red.
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:03 [#00111796]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
Yellow spoiled by red is called orange. wierd
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:05 [#00111802]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker
|
|
you'd think they'd call it redyel
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:07 [#00111805]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
I prefer yelred
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:11 [#00111813]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker
|
|
however you cannot underestimate the power of being blue when you want to be red
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:12 [#00111817]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
Blue is called green when greeted by yellow. "Bluyel" or "yelblu" You decide!
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-03-05 00:14 [#00111823]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker
|
|
blullow
|
|
mylittlesister
from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111826]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular
|
|
redlow?
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111827]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
I like it!!!
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111828]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
Both of them!!
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-05 00:54 [#00111876]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
My friend's theory on the color grey:
"I beleive that the colour gray is actually a hue not visible to the human eye. The human eye therefore interprets gray as a colorless shade. If we are able to see only a small part of the spectrum, then surely there are colors the human eye can see which lack both chroma and hue, such as gray. The properties of this colour would seem to suggest that it is indeed a new unclassified colour."
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:57 [#00111879]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to xlr: #00111876
|
|
i wouldn't put any money on ur friends theory ; )
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:58 [#00111880]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
actually, wouldn't grey be a mixture of colours? because thats what white is, and grey is just less white
|
|
Vader
from € Lisbon, PT on 2002-03-05 00:59 [#00111881]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker
|
|
Let me test:
[i]Vader[i]
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-03-05 01:03 [#00111886]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm proud not to have posted on this horrible, spam filled piece of crap.
But it's too late to be proud NOW. :-(
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-05 01:06 [#00111888]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
hehe. i dont trust his theory either. he also tried to prove the existence of -0.
|
|
Vader
from € Lisbon, PT on 2002-03-05 01:19 [#00111894]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker
|
|
2nd try hope it works: [i]vader[/i]
or else..............I´m going to sleep!
|
|
Vader
from € Lisbon, PT on 2002-03-05 01:25 [#00111899]
Points: 1000 Status: Lurker
|
|
Bhah! It didn´t work (italic letters) well I guess its sleep time (smart thing not to watch all that rotten madness)
Nite everyone and keep counting! (whatever you were counting)
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 06:14 [#00112075]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular
|
|
counting is a very interesting concept. For things to be counted, they need to be similar... or do they? This gets into music concepts for me... and maybe music is just a manifestation of something on a higher level, it has to do with symmetry. You have to define what you are counting, and I suppose there must be some symmetry among all the things you group together to count. You can have five ostriches, that's simple enough, until you think that each ostriche is a seperate individual. I can't quite put my finger on what I'm trying to say. What if you have 5 completely different things? The only similarity they have is that they are different. You can say you have 5 "objects", a vague word. I think the mind categorizes stuff by symmetry. I don't know what I'm talking about.
|
|
Messageboard index
|