disturbing... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 362 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
disturbing...
 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 19:44 [#00110058]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



i'm not sure if i'm being understood. i think i agree with
much of what is being said. there is a difference between
realizing that life is a unique situation that shouldn't be
taken for granted and thinking that you are special more so
than a nonreligious person. you know, it's possible to
recognize the miracle of existence without being stuck on
the bible or the all-mighty.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 19:48 [#00110061]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



is it ridiculous for a person to feel that there is more to
life than particles? religious folk are just trying to
understand these feelings, but often rely to heavily on the
popular dogma rather than find the answers themself.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-03 19:57 [#00110069]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Canerfold: #00110061



ya.. but more and more of life's 'wonders' are being
revealed to us every day..

true love or pheromones?
depression or some sort of chemical inbalance in ur brain?

u see what im getting at...

more and more of what we consider to be the most amazing
things about life are being shown to be very physical
processes


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:06 [#00110075]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



i think you are eating it up a little much. we know that
depression and our emotions have a correlating physical
process, but can you tell me how you get from chemical to
emotion? see, your emotions, your consciousness is not a
product of your brain. that would make freewill an illusion
and if you want believe that go aheas, but i know that when
i will to move my finger it moves and that's that. the
chemical reactions in your brain are the physical
manifestation of your consciousness. it is the tangiblility
of our emotions and thoughts.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-03-03 20:09 [#00110076]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00109037



I do believe there are catalysts that caussed the major
cataclysms such as the big bang...but whether it was a god
with capital G O D is doubtful..a single monlithic entity
goes against wisdom of thousands of generations and
civilizations..there are forces yes..hence the elaborate and
detailed pantheons from the most primitive societies right
down to the roman empire..but a single god..or a trinity
even..naah..


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:10 [#00110077]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



science just breaks up the questions of "what the hell is
this reality stuff?" into smaller questions like "what is an
electron and where do the forces come from?" science
doesn't answer anything completely. it is just a tool used
to predict so that we can consciously manipulate physical
reality to our benefit (or our demise). the idea that we
are coming to know everything through science is an
illusion.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:10 [#00110078]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



i am a spiritual person, but i don't believe in god nor do i
believe in religion -- i believe in a conscious universe
that we are a part of, a valid contributing part - i always
had this idea that we are alive so that our memories and
experiences would go into some cosmic pool.

and science isn't cold or lifeless as it is portrayed by
religious leaders and their ilk - a lot of scientists are
passionate and open-minded individuals who are pushing back
the boundaries of thought and imagination more than any
preacher or philosopher.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:11 [#00110080]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to Canerfold: #00110077



like a famous scientist once said "the whole universe is in
a cup of hot tea" (richard feynman) *paraphrased*


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:12 [#00110082]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



who cares if there is a single god? if there is such thing
as a god, surely it is merely the sum of all things, making
us a part of god, but that is really irrelevent. i know
that i make the universe move, not some seperate all-mighty
being. definitely not the christian god. i might be made
in god's image, but then so is a rock and a star system, and
a bacteria... but i really think there are more powerfukl
unkowns to be concerned with.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:16 [#00110084]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



it's good to hear that you consider yourself spiritual
without being religious. many don't understand the
difference.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:16 [#00110086]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to Canerfold: #00110082



if they are unknown, how can you be convinced they are
there? that is faith, which is the main component of
religious brainwashing (excuse the bias).

we are all gods, a god is nothing special. we are the big
bang after all - we are the universe, not separate from it -
so any "GOD" as you mean it would have to exist outwith the
universe, and therefore outwith our existence surely?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:17 [#00110087]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to Canerfold: #00110084



yeah, especially religious people - once they find out you
ain't religious they think you must be some kinda infidel
and soulless creep :)


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:20 [#00110088]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



yes, but we all faith in something. can't really be without
it. i mean, i have faith that I have free will. you have
faith in something. most scientists have faith that
physical matter is without conscoiusness.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-03 20:21 [#00110090]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



"... your emotions, your consciousness is not a product of
your brain. that would make freewill an illusion and if you
want believe that go aheas, but i know that when i will to
move my finger it moves and that's that. the chemical
reactions in your brain are the physical manifestation of
your consciousness. "

exactly! free will IS an illusion...
it seems u acknowledged that.. then just dismissed it cus
its sort of a depressing idea
its like u pointed out that there could be two
possibilities, then just chose the most comfortable one
without any rational reason.

consider this:

ur brains electrical activity and ur minds thoughts happen
simotaniously, so u cant say which one comes first, or which
is the product of the other...
...u cant say for sure that

BUT

physical things (ie: drugs) DO affect ur mind very clearly
and obvious way

meanwhile, examples of our mind affecting physical things
are always very wish-washy...
(ie, electrical brain activity being the product of, or
cause of thoughts)

for example:
if u cut out a chunk of ur physical brain, ur mind will be
affected very obviously
but i cant just think of something and then see an obvious
physical manefestation of my thought:
ie,i cant just imagine a car then have it appear before me

physical process affect your 'mind', not the other way
around
then with chaos theory, it becomes clear that free will is
in fact an illusion, since all events have causes, and those
causes have causes, etc...

BUT (if ur still reading) i know it can be argued just as
affectively the other way
(physical universe existing only in ur mind)... so im not
saying im right and ur wrong or anything...



 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:21 [#00110092]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



and i don't mean to talk down science so much. i am very
much a science minded person. i just happen to interpet the
data a bit differently than popular science does.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:23 [#00110093]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



but even drugs are a part of your consciousness aminal.
everything is a manifestation of your consciousness. we are
just focal point of consciousness, nodes if you will.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-03-03 20:23 [#00110094]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to Canerfold: #00110082



yup agree with marlowe collective subconsious strain of
thought..I believe the god is in the dna..it's the genetic
memory that we pass from generations to generation..also
fits in with the theory of evoulution..as genrations pass
the poll of memories and experience widen and deepens..the
genes thus mutate and evolve to accomodate and house the
experiences of the previous generations....there was a time
when the human being was coded..given the capacity to
compute abstract thought..the mind was an open unhibited and
inviting organ..magic existed b/w that time and the time the
language was invented...then suddenly the freedom became
subjective..the need to catalogue and codify everything gave
birth to the modern man and the death to the elemantal
forces and gods..or at least removal from this physical
plane to that of imagination..and mind


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:24 [#00110096]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



how does chaos go against free will? with every conscoius
decision i make, i affect the entire universe.... conscious
mind manifesting the universe


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:27 [#00110098]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



and i said that IF your consciousness is a manifestation of
your brain, then free will is an illusion. you brain is
merely the centroid of your consciousness.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-03 20:27 [#00110099]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Canerfold: #00110096



"how does chaos go against free will? with every conscoius
decision i make, i affect the entire universe.... conscious

mind manifesting the universe"

yes.. but then YOUR concious decisions are also affected by
other things.. being your control
if u follow the theory through completely, then ur concious
decisions are nothing but hte products of OTHER events

just like the hurricane is, in part, the product of the
butterfly



 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:27 [#00110100]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to Canerfold: #00110096



thing is, how do you know that it is a conscious
decision? how do we know that we have free will - i really
don't have that kind of faith, not just saying that, i don't
believe i have free will


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-03 20:29 [#00110102]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00110099



*i meant BEYOND your control...
..not BEING your control


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:31 [#00110105]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



About DNA... the strands of DNA in your body reflect you
emotions. When you expereince fear or tension or anger and
such the coils tighten and bunch up. they relax and stretch
durring more positive emotions. The U.S. military has
conducted extensive research that no body seems to be able
to interpret. When a cell is removed from your body, the
DNA still reacts to your emotions. DNA was brought miles
away from the test subject and still was able to measure the
same reactions in the DNA.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:36 [#00110108]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



yeah, like the "psychic" connexion remains? the ripples of
spacetime


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:37 [#00110109]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



lol, well, I'll never KNOW that I have free will, but then I
will never KNOW anything. Might as well give and kill off
all life on Earth. Maybe it was ok that Hitler killed
millions of Jewish peopl because, after all, it was only a
fucking product of the forces of physics. You don't know
that free will is an illision anymore than I know it is not.
But there is such a thing as experience. My experience is,
I want the glass of water, I'll go get it. And so I do. I
don't understand how we came to think there was a
sepereation between physical reality and consciousness. You
have to deny everything you feel to believe it.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:41 [#00110112]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



If physical reality and consciousness are one and the same,
rather than conscoiusness being the product of physical
processes, then think of what evolution might be. Evolution
is the incresing complexity of consciousness, and therefore
control over physical reality. The more complex the
organism, the more it affects the world around it. Here we
are, a highly complex conscious being, and our affect on the
world around us is massive.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-03 20:41 [#00110113]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



i KNOW i dont know!
i never said i did!
and i certainly never meant to sound that way

thats why i included this handy little disclaimer:
"BUT (if ur still reading) i know it can be argued just as
effectively the other way
(physical universe existing only in ur mind)... so im not
saying im right and ur wrong or anything... "


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:42 [#00110114]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



k sorry aminal


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-03 20:44 [#00110118]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



got to go do laundy, later


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-03 20:45 [#00110119]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



i'm off to bed now - i hope this thread continues so i can
put my tuppenceworth in in 8 hours :)


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-03-03 20:48 [#00110122]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



holy shit thats messed up


 

offline kalaim badkaama from Apt 512 in Gilmour Orbiter (Re on 2002-03-03 21:11 [#00110153]
Points: 1331 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00109944



I was just kidding.
But I think that 1st forms of religion (mostly shamanic,
like in south america before the spanish conquests) are the
fruits of drug absorption.
In fact, there is more natural Psychotrops in s.america than
in the whole world.



 

offline MO2 from Minneapolis, MN (United States) on 2002-03-03 21:46 [#00110195]
Points: 321 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ubik: #00109025



Ubik, you read my mind.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-03-03 21:58 [#00110212]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to Canerfold: #00110105



yup..they code and log all of your expereinces..


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-04 14:45 [#00110874]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



do you think scientists will ever be able to interpret
electic pulses into langage? i.e. read our thoughts?


 

offline Omneignotumus on 2002-03-04 14:49 [#00110878]
Points: 506 Status: Lurker



Evolution does not equal increasing complexity. Evolution
and complexity are not directly related. This is the main
flaw of the pop-culture definition if evolution.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-04 20:49 [#00111511]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



complexity on the conscoius level... intelligence...
complexity in the way in which we manipulate the
suroundings, which are not necessarily seperate from us.

we'll probably be able to read eachother's thoughts through
the subtleties in body movement, facial expression and even
the subtle vibrations in the air before we need to decode
the brain, but of course it's possible. it's just too
inneficient to use logic for communications. intuition will
slowly take down the boundaries between us... which is scary
for some, because we are obsessed with privacy, but once
we're ready we can just express and drop the worries.
communication in any form is a miracle if you ask me. we
take for granted how fucking ridiculously complex and
amazing speach is.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-04 20:53 [#00111520]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



we don't map out the vibrations in the air to understand
voice. we developed a sensitivity to it. all our thoughts
affect the subtle vibrations in our body and the air around
us. the entire universe vibrates with our mind. only a
matter of time before we reach the next level of
sensitivity. telepathy is not such a strange thing. it
will be every bit as scientifucally explainable as voice
communication.


 

offline astar from Canada on 2002-03-04 21:00 [#00111530]
Points: 247 Status: Regular



where did you read that bit about army research on DNA? i'm
really interested there.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-04 21:25 [#00111555]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to astar: #00111530



ya me too sounds interesting


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-03-04 21:31 [#00111563]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Canerfold: #00111520 | Show recordbag



I think that's a fair point, we don't have to "think" about
sight, it just happens. However, I'm more inclined to
believe telepathy is dying out, we don't need it now due to
phones so it will "atrophy". Similairly I expect eyesight to
get worse now that we have glasses.


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-04 23:07 [#00111684]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



how could it die out? it's barely surfaced. we are
obviously a species obsessed with communication. imo, we
will come to need telepathy in time so that communication
will be instantaneous. i could only imagine this leading to
us entering a more unified state like a single being is
unified by cells.... realize i'm only specualting because i
get a kick out of the possibilities of the future. things
as they are, as we know life, have only been this way for an
infinitely small amount of time in comparison to eternity,
so i assume things will unimaginalbly different. i also
speculate that the acceleration of change is positive. if
you follow the landmarks of say, the creation of the
universe, to the creation of stars, of earth, of life, of
language and art, of computers, it all seems to be speeding
up. then again who am i to choose what the landmarks are?
just seems like things are getting quite fast, and that's
where all these apacalyptic feelings are coming from in the
religions, but maybe it won't be the end, but the beginning
of something...


 

offline Canerfold from Minneappleseed (United States) on 2002-03-04 23:12 [#00111693]
Points: 385 Status: Lurker



i never read anything about that dna experiment. i can't
remember his name, but this geologist, sort of a "new age"
person, he gave a talk on all sorts of shit, just things
that nobody talks about because it makes no sense within the
simplistic view of reality. another bit he gave us was
something some physicists at nasa did. a couple guys were
observing the way light behaves in a vacuum. nothing
particualrly interesting was coming out of the research
until one of them, for some unknown reason (just imagine joe
physicist coming up with this), decided to put a piece of
human dna in the vacuum. the very idea that he thought to
this is amazing! what in the world would prompt him to such
a thing? anyway, i don't remember exactly, but the light
would bend in unexplainable ways, curling around the double
helix or something. blows me away.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-05 00:15 [#00111825]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



binary code: 0 and 1
DNA code: Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine, and Guanine

i wonder if one day, genetic engineering would create
biological matter to substitute for mechanized precision
devices. i don't even know where to begin as far as backing
my theory, but for one thing, it could benefit the
environment.


 

offline Omneignotumus on 2002-03-05 00:27 [#00111847]
Points: 506 Status: Lurker



Organic computer research is actually at its most exciting
moment ever at present. Several molecular switch schemes
have been successful, one of which involves nucleic acid.
Using DNA logic gates can theoretically allow for the
potency of today's super computer in a single drop of water.



 

offline Omneignotumus on 2002-03-05 00:30 [#00111856]
Points: 506 Status: Lurker



Its happening already now, Pachi, in several different
disciplines. I am a 3rd year PhD student Molecular Genetics
and I own a company that brokers financing for new
nanoscience companies. I've worked closely with a few
different groups that are working with nanomachinery. If you
are interested, check out the latest news in Microfluidics,
MEMS (microelectromechanical systems), and organic
computers. There is some excellent research going on.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 00:43 [#00111872]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Omneignotumus: #00111856



that sounds REALLY interesting Omneignotumus, do u have any
links?

i was discussing that w/ a friend of mine a few months
ago... biological computers, that sort of thing

i saw in some magazine (i think it was Popular Science,
actually) that IBM has created organic memory...
it looked like these blue cubes, that were supposed to be
able to hold a LOT of info..

Omneignotumus, what do u know about this?
links/info?


 

offline Omneignotumus on 2002-03-05 01:26 [#00111902]
Points: 506 Status: Lurker



The internet is a notoriously below average place to read
about modern science; there is a lot of junk and corrupted
information on there. So I rarely look for information of
this kind on there. Myself and a few of my friends
occasionally write for online science commentaries though;
here's a pretty informative (all be it anitquated) statement
for someone with mild interest.
http://www.chemsoc.org/chembytes/ezine/1998/comp.htm


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 01:34 [#00111910]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Omneignotumus: #00111902



thanks!
ya i know what u mean about the net...

i think the ease of posting info on it means anyone can
publish information on anything.. and a lot of the time its
people who simply dont know what the hell their talking
about, and they end up mis-informing others


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-05 01:37 [#00111912]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



btw, what have you heard about photon computing?

i dont really know much about it.. but as i understand it,
it works sort of like our electricity based computers of
today, but with photons taking the place of electrons
presumably this would allow us to fit more and more complex
circuits closer together, where electrons would jump accross
to the next channel, photons would not...

or something like that?


 


Messageboard index