|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2006-01-20 09:42 [#01822997]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
even though kevin smith has become a cash hungry whore, here's a link to the new clerks movie trailer, which looks like it might be pretty funny.
link
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2006-01-20 09:45 [#01823002]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
wow, they're old now...
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2006-01-20 09:52 [#01823005]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
i don't know, why does there have to be a sequel or trilogy for every single movie? it really cheapens the originals. does he need another house or something?
|
|
rustic
from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 09:57 [#01823009]
Points: 151 Status: Lurker
|
|
Kevin Smith's core audience is hardly the most sophisticated in the world. Anyone who has watch the "an audience with" DVD will know that. Why the hell shouldn't he make a bawdy remake if he wants? His fanbase will be wooping all the way to the cinema.
|
|
staz
on 2006-01-20 09:57 [#01823010]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular
|
|
i've never understood how some people keep claiming sequels cheapen originals... they're separate movies, why would it matter at all?
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2006-01-20 09:58 [#01823011]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to staz: #01823010
|
|
i guess you're right - who cares
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2006-01-20 10:03 [#01823014]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
understandably they're not the most sophisticated films, but i watched and enjoyed them through high school, so i'll check it out. i was originally disappointed upon hearing about the sequel, but i'm actually looking forward to seeing it now.
sorta like jay and silent bob strike back - it was dumb, but if you had seen the previous four films, you got all the inside jokes. damn you kevin smith!
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 10:08 [#01823017]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
I watched it last week with trepidation but when Among The Living started up I was smiling already. Could be great, could be weak, probably tarnish the original somewhat either way, I'll still buy the dvd though, just cause Smith needs the cash. Fat fuck.
Casting your ugly wife in a major role - X *Family Fortunes EH-URRR*
|
|
rustic
from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 10:17 [#01823030]
Points: 151 Status: Lurker
|
|
i love kevin smith films dont get me wrong - you need a bit of silliness
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-20 10:19 [#01823036]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
Clerks and Mall Rats are two of my all time favorite movies.
better than Episode III even. Better than Indiana Jones even. Better than The Goonies even.
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2006-01-20 10:32 [#01823046]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
direct to clerks 2 site
|
|
Oddioblender
from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2006-01-20 10:47 [#01823063]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker
|
|
i like kevin smith - i'm not sure if i'll shell out money to go see a sequel though. i think the first film stands well on its own.
|
|
staz
on 2006-01-20 10:57 [#01823074]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular
|
|
i watched clerks for the first time a few months ago, felt it was mostly a bunch of inane chatter
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-20 11:01 [#01823077]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to staz: #01823074
|
|
i like the the fact that the actors are so obviously reading their lines of inane chatter in most of the scenes. i think it's quite charming.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2006-01-20 11:11 [#01823086]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
looks good.
"felt it was mostly a bunch of inane chatter"
welcome to a kevin smith film. :)
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 11:19 [#01823088]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #01823017 | Show recordbag
|
|
She did pose for Playboy and show her rat to the world though. Nice body.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2006-01-20 11:40 [#01823094]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to staz: #01823010
|
|
I dont know.
I think this looks neat.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 11:52 [#01823099]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm in two minds as to whether get excited or not.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-20 12:15 [#01823112]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to giginger: #01823088
|
|
omg someone post a picture of rosario's rat! omg omg.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-20 12:16 [#01823113]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
oh wait, we talking joey lauren adams?
no dishwater blond rats please.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 12:20 [#01823119]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01823112 | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm talking his wife. Let me find it.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 12:25 [#01823124]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I found this one.
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
staz
on 2006-01-20 13:06 [#01823151]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01823077
|
|
yeah, i thought it made it even worse... or better... i'm not sure. i was kind of annoyed at it all. but i still watched it all the way through. like a car wreck with dialogue, maybe.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-20 15:30 [#01823299]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Did Evolume see the rat?
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-21 00:59 [#01823543]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular
|
|
'jay and silent bob' was one of the all time worst movies ever made. will ferral was the only good actor but was pulled down quite a bit from everyone else. the worst part was the character silent bob overdoing the stupid silent gimmick and making these... bizarre and unfitting facial expressions the whole time as if to make up for his silence. you can see him doing one in the cover picture of the movie.
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2006-01-21 01:06 [#01823545]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01823543 | Show recordbag
|
|
I totally agree...that movie was so bad.
As for Clerks 2....I just feel that he must be kinda desperate to have made this....
I may go see it, but I am not sure.... IMO he seems to have hit the bottom of the barrel with writing this. The first Clerks was such a classic and could never be even competed with. He should have just let classic be classic instead of releasing a second one....
|
|
Messageboard index
|