track making order | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 155 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
track making order
 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2005-12-29 19:37 [#01808564]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



do you have any special order in which you make songs

i normally like to make a beat
1) snares first
2) kicks
3) other stuff/sounds

then from there its really just whatever comes first, i
dunno. is there a particular order that's good for making
songs?


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2005-12-29 19:40 [#01808565]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



also does anyone ever get restless and tired while making
songs and you just kind of have to lay down, and you sort of
feel insane? like, if i have to hear that shit repeat one
more time i will kill myself, etc.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2005-12-29 19:41 [#01808566]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



and howcome that phenomenon doesn't happen when you listen
to other peoples tracks? you can listen to someone elses
music for hours on-end but when its your own for a long time
it's just kind of like, fuck, this is awful, where are the
potassium pills, etc.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-29 22:28 [#01808577]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I normally start everything by laying down the kicks, they
are the pulse and beat of the song. Then I add the bassline.
Then I add the pads and finally I add leads and random stuff
+ drum fills here and there.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-29 22:29 [#01808578]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Then I mix it down/master it depending on the style of music
it is and how much dynamic range I want in the track.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-29 22:56 [#01808579]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



here's how i have made every song i've ever made:

1. i enjoy a nice red wine, leisurely aerating the aroma
and being sure to savour the bouquet as i watch the sunset
in the distance.

2. i lay out all the tools i will need in advance on a
large, embroidered cheesecloth.

3. flattening out my parchment, i say a little prayer
asking the spirit ancestors for a bit of inspiration.

4. then, i take my quill and create ledgers and rules with
a ruler.

5. incense and candles are lit on the altar.

6. taking my trusty hunting knife, i then cut the throat of
a fatted lamb as a sacrifice to the unholy Overlord.

7. more prayers for inspiration and the death of my
enemies.

8. i then roll two d-10 and use the appropriate chart,
taking into account the appropriate modifiers.

9. i feed the results into my trusty hexidecimal
calculator, type, "LOAD MUSIC" and wait.

10. fifteen minutes later, i have a nice computer printout
in ASCII, which makes an abstract shape in computer
characters.

11. using a sort of "paint-by-numbers" technique, i take my
homemade paints (made using oil and various stains, grass,
blood, etc) and fill in the printout.

12. once the paint has dried, i use ultra-violet light to
see the hidden messages, which translate into a word jumble,
which then phonetically spells out a single letter of the
musical scale.

13. i record that single note into my sheet music, taking
into account the path of the light through the skull crystal
i have mounted at one point of the ashen pentagram on the
floor to find the duration and things like that.

14. repeat steps 8-13 until i have enough notes, or the
candles have burned out, whichever comes first.

15. i take the completed score over to the studio.

16. i hand-select from the finest session players
available, sometimes also grabbing random passers-by off the
street.

17. production time: reels are spun, levels faded,
equalizers tweaked, panoramics twisted, mics checked...

18. three weeks later, i have a b


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-29 22:57 [#01808580]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



bangin' new track done.

i've heard aphex works pretty much the same way.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-29 23:11 [#01808582]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



when you try this process for yourself, make sure and do
step seven really well. it really thins out the
competition, making your own music seem better by
comparison.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-29 23:13 [#01808583]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



and i use and recommend 5" floppy disks when you RUN and
BOOT and tell logo how many steps and things of that sort.

don't worry if it's too confusing right now - this is all
going to be in my book, "How To Write Music Good For
Dummies". coming out first quarter '06 look for it!!


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-12-29 23:14 [#01808584]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



wow, i kinda work in the same way but in my bedroom in my
underpants, so there a few changes, for example, to step 15.


 

offline staz on 2005-12-29 23:36 [#01808585]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



i don't have any specific procedure at all. it's mostly just
getting the idea out in sequence, with the most intense part
first.


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-12-29 23:42 [#01808586]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



normally i just sit down and after getting some melodies or
something tracks make themself.
i also sometimes start a track by getting ideas on the piano
or guitar.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-30 03:16 [#01808602]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



depends what my first idea involves. it usually happens when
i hear /think of a decent component id like to use in a
song, and i then slowly write the rest of the song around
it. sometimes its the beat, sometimes its a melody,
sometimes just a cool/funny voice sample i want to use.


 

offline Matvey from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2005-12-30 03:30 [#01808607]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular



lately two orders for me:

order 1:
1. Open CoolEdit Pro 2
2. Reach for its noise generator or tone generator
3. make a short sound which determines the tempo for further
"work"
4. improvise further with it, copying and applying simple
things like (all or some of them):
.making some rhythmic shit from the original drawing the
envelope graph
.FFT
.noise reduction/hiss reduction - often creates something
new :)
.distortion sharp fuzz preset
.stretch (more often the pitch one)
5. session is being made at the same time, improvising
6. the results are usually 30-50 seconds long, they are
saved for further bright idea enlightment

order 2:
1. Open SymSynth
2. Start a new preset and twiddle these knob imitations
3. Make some riff
4. Open more copies of this program and let them play
something at the same time.
5. Possibly open rebirth and make a rhythmic pattern
6. Possibly open CoolEdit and make some loop play, possibly
noise or a loop from the tone generator
7. If something interesting forms from this, save files into
one folder, export all the shit to WAVs and switch to
CoolEdit
8. Try to make some structure, with creating new sounds in
cooledit or other two mentioned if it appears to be needed

results are saved for further enlightment, which, doesn't
come to me, fucking unfortunately.

sometimes i have a ready structure which I composed much
earlier, and the only thing remaining to do is the
realization of it. Making sounds and putting them into their
places in cooledit session or even acid pro, but in the ends
all tracks are exported to cooledit for mastering attempts.


 

offline S M Pennyworth from East Timor on 2005-12-30 04:10 [#01808613]
Points: 2196 Status: Lurker



my procedure:
1. down a bottle of beer
2. make the track from start to finish, one pattern at a
time


 

offline Matvey from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2005-12-30 04:18 [#01808615]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular | Followup to S M Pennyworth: #01808613



ha ha


 

offline Matvey from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2005-12-30 04:21 [#01808616]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular | Followup to S M Pennyworth: #01808613



maybe i can't make tracks because i don't drink this fucking
stinky piss liquid? i have to think about it... I'm tired of
not making tracks


 

offline isosceles_cat from Toronto (Canada) on 2005-12-30 04:25 [#01808618]
Points: 52 Status: Lurker



I like to just jam for a while, recording my outputs. Then I
go through the recordings, keep the good, cut the bad. After
that I sequence the parts. Then refine & rework until it is
acceptable.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-30 05:33 [#01808660]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



1: Turn on sound
2: Press keys on synth until melody emerges or record
something somewhere else
3: Press/record more for more melody
4: some cutting, pasting and pitching
5: Percussion
6: more percussion or recordings
7: more pitching and cutting
8: bass
9: more cutting and pitching
10: recording more
11: cutting
12: pitching
13: recording
14: percussion
15: cutting
16: effects
17: pitching
18: cutting
19: recording
20: attempt mix
21: cut
22: pitch
23: effects


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-30 05:43 [#01808666]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Before starting a track I listen to a wide range of music,
it really could be anything, anything, from Autechre, to
Boards of Canada to Plaid. I mean ABSOLUTELY
anything, it all goes in, all these wildly different
influences help me decide what I think I should be doing.
Then, to work.

1. Remember the three M's, Melody Melody Melody. Ideally
Lush Melody. Make a really lush melody. Add another one on
top. This is the cherry on your lush cake.

2. Fucked up beats. Lay down seriously fucked up beats.

3. Combine Lush Melodies with Fucked Up Beats.

4. Add 8 metric tonnes of Reverb.

5. Record to cassette.

6. Record back to laptop.

7. Repeat steps 5 and 6 a number of times.

8. Release to an salivating public on EKT.



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-30 05:45 [#01808668]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808666 | Show recordbag



gosh darn it, that's the most awesomely wide spectre of
musical influences in the history of forever and
beyond
and then some!


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-12-30 06:38 [#01808693]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



i have to hear one noise that makes me want to go further
with the idea - if nothing grabs me then i dont bother

normally its a midrange noise or bassline . just something
to play a melody out of

and yes i have that feeling that if i hear my songs once
more im going to freak the shit out...

a lot of artists express those feelings in interviews -
saying they've heard their songs so many times theres
nothing left in them anymore and they get arduous...so you
aint alone!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-30 07:24 [#01808722]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808666



your recipe lacks CRUNCH.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-30 07:30 [#01808723]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to plaidzebra: #01808722 | Show recordbag



Your recipe is the nutritional equivalent of eating
cardboard.

FIESTY COMEBACK!!!!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-30 07:39 [#01808725]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808723



my recipe is a grower, i'm convinced of it!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-30 07:40 [#01808726]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01808722 | Show recordbag



surely you mean krunk!

yeayh!

aow-kaay!

yeayh!

aow-kaay!


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-12-30 08:11 [#01808740]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



who cares what the order when the jams are sweet?


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-30 08:32 [#01808747]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



euphonicfiller may also be a grower.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-30 08:34 [#01808749]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to plaidzebra: #01808747 | Show recordbag



I order you to stop making music!!!!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-30 08:41 [#01808751]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808749



i ask you for evidence that i have ever made music. my
recipe is for masa corn crepes with artichoke flan.


 

offline oyvinto on 2005-12-30 08:41 [#01808752]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808749 | Show recordbag



doggie, where's your blog? you're a good writer.


 

offline staz on 2005-12-30 08:47 [#01808756]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01808666



hahahhahahha


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-30 08:49 [#01808758]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to oyvinto: #01808752 | Show recordbag



You're too kind. No really. XLT's my blog I guess. I did try
to do my own but it's 0.00000006 % as funny as I wanted it
to be. I need a comedy foil like pladizebra to bring out the
very best in me. But I did get "signed" by the Web's premier
music blog to contribute. Which one's that you ask? Only the
very best, Spoilt Victorian Child


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 08:50 [#01808760]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



I think Juan Atkins said thwe most important thing is the
bassline, and he always starts with that. I think he just
meant house music though.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 08:51 [#01808762]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808758



Simon Reynold's "Blissblog" is the only one worth reading.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-30 08:53 [#01808764]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808758



i think what i've brought out of you lately is the textual
equivalent of a dusty fart, and for this only you are to
blame.

you have gotten boring and predictable, and your obsession
with euphonicfiller has become unseemly.

but it's nice of you to refer to me as your comedy foil,
it's the nicest thing you've said to me since you said you'd
like to beat me to death with your sweaty hippy sandals.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-30 08:54 [#01808765]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to swears: #01808762 | Show recordbag



He seems obsessed with saying everything is prog+another
genre. And, like most people writing on the Internet without
an Editor, he writes far too fucking much for far too long.
But yes, sound guy, one from the good old days.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-30 08:59 [#01808768]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to plaidzebra: #01808764 | Show recordbag



I am not obsessed with Euphonicfilter.

However I have become posessessed by the spirit of


Attached picture

 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 08:59 [#01808770]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808765



Well, he is one of the editors of the cheesy American music
mag Spin. So I think that pays the bills, and he tends to
waffle about what he likes on his blog. Reading his stuff, I
tend to agree with what he says, it was cool how he
dismissed all the new NME bands as "ANOTHER fucking garage
rock revival." And he has a PHD in the history of jungle.


 

online big from lsg on 2005-12-30 09:00 [#01808771]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



exiting things are happening in the progressive breakcore
genre


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-12-30 09:10 [#01808778]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



right back at you cog_wrench

;-)


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-30 09:12 [#01808781]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to swears: #01808770



it was cool how he dismissed all the new NME bands as
"ANOTHER fucking garage rock revival."


what's so brilliant about that? everyone knows that. i've
been saying it since the strokes.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 09:12 [#01808782]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



I think it's cool that he's heard of Simon Reynolds!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-30 09:12 [#01808783]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01808768 | Show recordbag



that the awesomest image!


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-30 09:13 [#01808784]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01808771 | Show recordbag



very exciting things indeed!


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 09:13 [#01808785]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01808781



Yeah, me too.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 09:15 [#01808787]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Breakcore is just another fucking jungle revival. Breakbeats
are well past their sell by date now. All the breakcore
people will probably be making "Grimecore" in ten years
time.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-12-30 09:18 [#01808791]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



breakcore got old REAL fast for me, like within one year
fast

i still listen to soul and old country with great enjoyment
daily...and supposedly its not as techinical or dense...

i disagree...i wont be listening to vsnares when im 50...ill
be listening to otis redding !


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-30 09:20 [#01808799]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



All that grimecore shit is like all the stupidest ravers and
the stupidest geeks got together to enjoy the most obvious,
boring music ever.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-12-30 09:24 [#01808803]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



who would you constitute as being a part of that genre?

quite a while ago i equated breakcore to the goth scene and
a lot of people on here seemed to agree.!


 


Messageboard index