"silent" sound | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 496 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
"silent" sound
 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-19 11:06 [#01803178]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



i'm thinking of making an album using "silent sound" and by
that i mean raw vibrations that must be felt to be hurt, if
you know what i mean. i wondering whether i could use a
mixer or some sort of equalizer program to "Strip" the sound
down to just ambient vibration. any ideas?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-12-19 11:07 [#01803179]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



i'm thinking of making an album using "silent sound" and
by
that i mean raw vibrations that must be felt to be hurt, if
you know what i mean.


no.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-12-19 11:10 [#01803180]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



yes...send that recording to mego and youll be a
superstar...

trusting you can actually pull it off !!!

good luck



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-19 11:10 [#01803182]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



that's an interesting idea... i don't know if it's possible
though. if you imagine a thing that vibrates, it makes a
sound, yes, but you can't really feel the sound of it. you
feel the vibration...


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-19 11:15 [#01803184]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01803182



well, it's sort of a concept along the lines of music that's
only listenable when you're deaf. because i remember reading
somewhere that this Dj was doing a house set at a benefit
for deaf kids, and they were all dancing in time with the
music because they could feel the vibrations. i want to pull
of something like that, something you have to feel rather
than hear...


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-19 11:20 [#01803187]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



The range of human hearing is 20 to 20,000 Hz....I don't
think much audio gear can produce levels low enough. So you
would still have bass tones at least. You could experiment
with finding tones that resonate a lot i guess, but then it
would all depend on what your audience is listening with and
the acoustics of the space they are in + You wouldn't be
able to listen with headphones.


 

offline plantre from United States on 2005-12-19 11:21 [#01803189]
Points: 469 Status: Regular



i think that's a really sweet concept, you shouldd
definitely do it!


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-19 11:21 [#01803190]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to Oddioblender: #01803184



you just have to make it really loud to make things in the
room vibrate though.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-19 11:41 [#01803209]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01803190



low sounds around 20 Khz, loud. check.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-12-19 11:44 [#01803216]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



awesome


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-12-19 11:46 [#01803219]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



without the sound, there'll be no vibrations. so there'll be
sound. so it won't be silent.

as for the rest - this just sounds like you're trying to
reinvent ambient music? or at least the stuff rroji ikeda
does. waves increasing and decreasing in frequency, so that
they clash or align with eachother, so there's this weird
sort of rhythmic "feel" to it.



 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-19 13:27 [#01803365]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to Oddioblender: #01803178



Why don't you just make some party jams?


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-12-19 13:31 [#01803371]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



you do that and I'll make annoying high-pitched music for
dogs


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-12-19 13:52 [#01803395]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I'd be cautious about mastering something like that.
Extremely low frequencies, when amplified, specifically ones
that are under 50hz can kill most home speakers, mid to low
end monitors and headphones (I have heard that studio
monitors that cost less that $20000 are most likely not
going to be up to the task).


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-19 14:00 [#01803398]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



Bass tones with a quick attack envelope (eg. Slap bass) are
the most harmful to your ears aswell...deaf kids might be
able to take prolonged low frequencies at high amplitude but
you can't, so be cautious with the volume if you are going
to try anything + taxidermist is right also...don't blow all
your stuff up.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-12-19 14:27 [#01803412]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



elusives lungs will collapse.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-19 16:22 [#01803531]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Oddioblender: #01803184 | Show recordbag



deaf people can feel the vibrations anyway if it's loud
enough, so that's not really the seventh wonder of the
world.

it's an interesting idea, but you have to consider the
practical parts too:

1: very few people will have gear that allows them to
feel it.
2: you can only publish the music in an uncompressed
format.
3: it'll only be interesting for one or two songs.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-19 16:25 [#01803534]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01803531



good god, man, why don't you just rain on his fucking
parade?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-19 16:28 [#01803539]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01803534 | Show recordbag



because I can't :(

I was just saying that it doesn't seem very doable, making
an entire album with nothing but low rumblings that only 1
out of 10 people will notice...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-12-19 16:32 [#01803542]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Being honest it sounds stupidly ill conceived being based on
a misunderstanding of deaf people interpretation of sound
through vibration.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-19 16:33 [#01803544]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



stick to nerd bit hip 8 hop


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-12-19 16:35 [#01803545]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



Is deaf music going to be really loud, or really quiet? The
best way is to slap them on the back of the head
rhythmically. Audiophile sub sonic nonsense my arse.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-12-19 16:35 [#01803546]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01803542



ouch, that smarts! but rules are rules and i'm required to
award you the points for the most accurate response.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-12-19 16:37 [#01803547]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01803545 | Show recordbag



If there's is a charity gig for the RNID coming up fancy
going?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-12-19 16:40 [#01803550]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01803547



Pardon?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-12-19 16:40 [#01803552]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I want to see you playing bongo on some hearless persons
noggin.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-12-19 16:43 [#01803554]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



I'd love to whack a french loaf around a deaf ladies melon
for a bit after a few beers, when's a good time for you?


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-12-19 17:14 [#01803587]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



I recall Bullbaiting being from that trilogy. You are
quite keen about mentioning it is good to blow speakers to.
What exactly DID happen when you performed it live?

Oh, but that track has been used many times to get
people to realise what sound can do. People stop talking, no
matter how inattentive they are, for a start, and they stop
going to bar. it's a real alcohol suppressant! When people
see their shirts flapping, even though they can't really
hear anything, they know something's up. The walls shake,
all sorts of things start rattling, and hopefully, their
subconscious is deprogrammed at bit =)

Adi Newton (who we will get to later) called one of
his TAGC (The Anti Group Conspiracy) tracks "Teste Tones -
40 Hz". He never made the 40 Hz but you did, what is the
difference?

Because he tried to do it digitally, and because of a
phenomenon called the Nyquist Frequency, one cannot. So what
you hear on his record is just the overtones, not the
fundamental. I used a WW2 sine wave generator. Huge thing.
Took two people to lift it. When it was mastered at Abbey
Road, they called a guy down from upsatirs that hadn't been
in the cutting room for 25 years, who said it was, quote,
"impossible", and then they cut it =)


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-19 17:55 [#01803610]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



yes, i didn't think it to be easy.

i suppose i am expected to work on nerdcore all of my life.


 

offline S M Pennyworth from East Timor on 2005-12-19 18:36 [#01803630]
Points: 2196 Status: Lurker



i made some fast track that had portions in it made by
playing with extremely low frequencies. they cancelled out
all the other sounds.. really cool experience in
headphones.. it was like the sound was being sucked out of
the ears instead of going into them.. however, that track
completely slayed my good headphones. precaution.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-19 18:37 [#01803631]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



This is my new album, made up not of songs, but the ideas of
songs. You are meant to think about each title for three
minutes, apart from the last track which is 7 minutes.

I haven't actually written the titles yet, but when I do
I'll release the album in both downloadable txt format and
streaming html media.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-19 20:03 [#01803653]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



wtf cant make a 40hz tone on digital equipment ??
i though nyquist only affected sounds over a certain freq
is that saying that they were using digital stuff with a
sampl rate of < 80Hz ???


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-12-20 03:33 [#01803726]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Best buy a second hand Jungle/DnB/Grime soundsystem if you
want to be able to hear the freqs properly. Good luck! :)


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-20 07:13 [#01803787]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



i'd like to use samples <20Hz in a track - these are
inaudible but would cause stuff to shake around if played
loud. around that frequency also lies the "brown note" which
apparently makes you shit.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-20 07:14 [#01803789]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



oh yeah, "**censored**"

The brown note makes you need to have a poo.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-12-20 10:01 [#01803858]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



Yeah, you could do that, but you'd have to trry damn harrd
to make it interresting


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 10:32 [#01803867]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



" I recall Bullbaiting being from that trilogy. You are
quite keen about mentioning it is good to blow speakers to.
What exactly DID happen when you performed it live?

Oh, but that track has been used many times to get
people to realise what sound can do. People stop talking,
no
matter how inattentive they are, for a start, and they stop
going to bar. it's a real alcohol suppressant! When people
see their shirts flapping, even though they can't really
hear anything, they know something's up. The walls shake,
all sorts of things start rattling, and hopefully, their
subconscious is deprogrammed at bit =)

Adi Newton (who we will get to later) called one of
his TAGC (The Anti Group Conspiracy) tracks "Teste Tones -
40 Hz". He never made the 40 Hz but you did, what is the
difference?

Because he tried to do it digitally, and because of a
phenomenon called the Nyquist Frequency, one cannot. So
what
you hear on his record is just the overtones, not the
fundamental. I used a WW2 sine wave generator. Huge thing.
Took two people to lift it. When it was mastered at Abbey
Road, they called a guy down from upsatirs that hadn't been
in the cutting room for 25 years, who said it was, quote,
"impossible", and then they cut it =) "


heh, hafler trio strikes again


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 10:38 [#01803868]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Well, if you are going to do this, there is really only one
way to do it proper.

1) research the ABC box (driver/speaker enclosure); it is an
amazing design

2) you'll be looking at sub 30hz frequencies. anything
above that, meh, whatever. you want < 30 to get things
started

3) if you are in your late teens or early 20s, stop playing
with audio equipment if you are likely to get a spontaneous
pneumothroax (lung collapsing is not fun, but it does get
fun when the nurses are all interns/nurse-in-training from
the local college ... wee) i stopped playing with bass for a
while to make sure i wouldn't have any more lung
collapsing.

4) if you really want to do this, the PROPER way to do it
would be to build yourself an audio system ... make your
music and master it on THAT system.

To make an album like that would be impossible for everyone
to get the full effect. Maybe do a couple live shows to
showcase it (with your equipment of course) don't forget to
read up on ABC enclosures ;) ;) ;)

5) bass? low freq? resonation / standing waves are your
friend. Fs, etc. Enclosure is going to be most important.

The driver/speaker is going to be important too. Keep in
mind you will need quite a bit of x-max (excursion), but
when dealing with ported boxes and the sort (standing
backwaves) the driver will hardly move when properly tuned
;)

this allows you to throw a lot more power at that res. freq.
until you are out of x-max

you might want to study Fourier Transforms, maybe not.

since we are talking about sub 30Hz , those waves get VERY
long
20hz is around 54ft per full cycle.
youll need all these calculations to build your proper
"room" and heavily re-inforce it ... make sure that the
width of the walls is the proper length for a set desired
freq. lengths.

you might want to pick a couple freq and do resonate freq of
say, 20hz (1/2 or 1/4 wave, pref. half wave) and then maybe
a full 40hz wave etc.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 10:40 [#01803869]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



lot of calculation there, but when you start tlakin about
low frequencies , it gets increasing difficult to control
them.

the speaker enclosures will be VERY large

i'd say at least 10cubes per driver. maybe throw some
passive drivers in there and put it this way
you're goign to be able to fit your whole body in the port
;)

--------

now the reason i say build your own system and make/master
your album on that is well, no one is going to get the ful
effect.

so you should do this yourself and use this eq. to put on a
live show ;)

trust me, im a 20-30hz whore; i love it
but you're going to need a LOT of power (especially with
heavy cones on the drivers) and a lot of MDF wood

i dunno

annoy the neighbors good


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 10:45 [#01803870]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



human range is 20-20Khz yes, but no one can really hear
20hz

i think i can hear 24, 23 and 22 my mind might be playing
tricks on me so im not sure if i really "hear" it or
not...it's been a while.

i wouldn't recommend going much over 30hz

you would need different speaker/driver setups per freq too
and do some weird channalized shit for diff freqs.

maybe an underlying layer of oscillating 15Hz and some 27hz
thwacks for a beat and what not

but each of those would have to go to different speaker
setups
have to have some very precise low pass filters too so i
dunno, would probably be easier to do like 1 channel per
speaker then manually mix the channels in for the final
output.

ill try and dig up a video i did of my speaker going from
1Hz - 20 and jumping all a round

quite fun

lots of flex

but keep in mind when you port a box to a specific
freqeuncy, it will generally peak around (totally t/s
depending obviously) but generally 10-12hz higher than the
f3 -3dB cutoff point of the box

this is why you have to be careful
if you have one speaker setup build to F3 point around 25Hz,
the speaker will resonate in the box and barely move @ 25hz
(thus you can throw more power at it until you run out of
xmax like i said above) but

but

if you suddenly drop a 20hz drone or something lower, the
back wave and front wave become out of phase and you are
going to have a VERY VERY SLOPPY UNCONTROLLED SPEAKER MASS
moving violently back and forth, thus you will blow your
speaker in short moments.



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-20 10:51 [#01803872]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01803870 | Show recordbag



no one can really hear 20hz

well, that part is wrong. other than that I can't be
bothered reading all three posts.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 10:57 [#01803874]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



no.

the range is given as 20-20k, but the older you get the less
you can hear

if you seriously think you can hear 20Hz,

lol, whatever


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-20 11:16 [#01803880]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01803874 | Show recordbag



well, I can't hear lows that well, no, but I know it can be
done. the 20-20k thingie is just like a guideline. there are
people who hear well above and well under.

I hear up to 22khz or whatever on my left ear (the right one
is damaged (tinnitus)), though. army tested, maffakka!


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 11:26 [#01803884]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



how can it be done?

with highs you know on a test, yes
whether someone can hear it or not

because they either hear it or they dont

so you know if they are really hearing it

but with lows

to actually produce an audible signal, hmm
it would be a lot of pressure and the tester nor the testee
would truely know if they are hearing it

see what im saying?

with high freq, there is no vibration (well, noticable
vibration)
so the testee raises his hand when he hears it
check check

with the lows you can do this cause there is going to be mad
vibration and interference

so you really cant TRUELY test them ya see what im saying?

but realistically, i dont really anyone can hear 20hz
would be a strange test environment that's for sure
cool stuff


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-12-20 11:34 [#01803889]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01803884 | Show recordbag



well, it's probably got something to do with the ears of the
people who hear it. maybe they have bigger pieces in their
ears or whatever would be required, but there are people who
actually hear it, as opposed to just feeling it.. it
probably sounds very annoying.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2005-12-20 12:03 [#01803901]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



ok. first thing:

The sound of silence was recorded for the film "Lawrence of
Arabia". The track is called "Silence is Golden", perhaps a
joke at the amount of money generated from silence.
It is one of the most requested pieces of ambient sound for
films.
When listeing to it, it is clearly different to no sound,
yet has all the qualities of silence.

Second thing:

Psycho-acoustics. The human brain has circuits to convert
vibrations into perceived sounds. The human brain is very
clever but can be tricked. For example if you play the
harmonics of a tone, but not the fundamental your brain
knows that in nature the fundamental always exists, so it
recreates it.

This means that by doing clever DSP equations sounds can be
harmonically altered digitally and played through rubbish
laptop speakers, etc but seem to have far more perceived
bass than actual bass produced by the small speakers.

three:
your initial idea is pretentious and should be abandoned.
if you want to be all clever make a song based around
shepherd tones or something like that, or paradoxic sounds
or granular synthesis using tape and splicing it, etc


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-12-20 12:14 [#01803905]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Dance music (intelligent or otherwise) is fucked and all the
kids wanna hear is bands that sound like bands that formed
before they were born. And you're thinking of doing
self-indulgent crap like this? Make some dancefloor killing
party jams, for fuck's sake.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-20 12:19 [#01803911]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



GET REALLY COOL STROBE LIGHTS TOO



 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-20 23:19 [#01804267]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01803884



dam, elusive! thanks for the help. this is the info i
needed.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-21 18:50 [#01804737]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



bump one more time so i'll remember to copy this info
tomorrow. peace.


 


Messageboard index