|
|
hevquip
from a crabs carriage on 2001-05-30 21:12 [#00007541]
|
|
who thinks which is better? i think with software anyone can use it and produce songs in five minutes, but you can do more with it. i prefer hardware because i like the work that goes into the creative process and it's much fun to manipulate machinery.
|
|
M
from Fraggle Rock on 2001-05-30 21:16 [#00007543]
|
|
I don't have any technological know-how, so I'm forced to use software that someone else created in hardware that someone else created. If I get a unique idea, my only way of realizing it is to use someone else's software program for purposes other then what it was intended to do.
|
|
nano
from Malmö/Sweden on 2001-05-30 22:12 [#00007552]
|
|
I prefer software because in just so fucking poor. =( If i had money i'd have my whole bedroom full with all kinds of machinery and hardware and stuff. Hardware is more fun to play with but i think with software you can make it more perfect, like manipulate a sound how much you want and make it sound just the way you want.
|
|
phiz
from Amsterdam on 2001-05-31 08:47 [#00007624]
|
|
Hardware for me, i like to create 'Hands on', there's nothing better than grabbing, banging, twanging, twisting things to create a sound, a mouse just seems boring, one little thing in your hand and thats it. and also i'm not too fussed on sitting back and letting the tune play itself, sometimes live errors can create something new.
|
|
Glitch
from New Zealand on 2001-05-31 10:53 [#00007636]
|
|
yeah Phiz, I agree totally, some people dont understand that principal, I use chaos to help mold my tracks, but when it comes to a melody Id rather sit and play on one of my synths than enter notes on the computer.
|
|
Messageboard index
|