.NU Casualties | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
DADONCK
steve mcqueen
Hyperflake
...and 120 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613446
Today 38
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
.NU Casualties
 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-27 14:12 [#00104659]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular



...So MB V5 has been running some time now,what i want to
know is,who(so far),has been booted off,banned,told not to
come back etc?? Is Ducksucker the first one? I know what
your thinking:"He seems to be taking delight in this".You're
right. Bye for now. }:>


 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2002-02-27 14:16 [#00104666]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



jupitr and mike are the only ones i've seen get booted...

 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-02-27 19:17 [#00104864]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



i believe ducksucker was banned.....but i'm not totally
sure. you might do a search on the word ..ban..to find out
for sure. i believe there was some discussion about that.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-02-27 19:29 [#00104875]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



I still don't understand what you have to do to get banned
from a message board!


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-02-27 19:42 [#00104887]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00104875



i think it may have something to do with pushing the bounds
of 'good taste' or 'good/useful discussion.' perhaps the FAQ
says something about that ( oops i guess that shows i've not
read it completely..ehehhe)

anyway i don't totally agree with censoring people as a
rule, 1st amendment in all in our constitution. BUT when
someone is being offensive to the majority of people, being
disrespectful of the people that run this site, or are
spewing swill that has no relevence, well i can see why they
should be asked to cease and desist from what they are
doing. AFTER that, if they continue to do what they've been
told to NOT do, well then they have to deal with the
consequences....ie. banning for a time, etc.. sorry i'm so
wordy on this topic....chatty cathy here =0)

btw....i think the ban is not permanent, but again i'm not
totally sure


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-02-27 19:47 [#00104891]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00104875



experiment man, and try to find out exactly what it takes...
:)


 

Messageboard index