who's fault is it? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 650 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
who's fault is it?
 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 10:53 [#01773945]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



...imo.

what 80's pop bands were good, goran?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 11:02 [#01773954]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to r40f: #01773945



let's first find out whether you find post punk, new wave to
be pop music? if yes i can name a lot. if not then the cure
and roxy music for example :)


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 12:03 [#01774038]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01773954



american new wave (ie blondie, the knack, etc) definitely
was utterly commercial pop. post punk - i don't think so.

again, things were different in america than in europe, so
it's hard to compare.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 14:52 [#01774152]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



yeah, there was definitely a difference. new order for
example are meant to be post punk, personally i find it not
that different to blondie - i like a few of their songs
actually :)


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 15:05 [#01774161]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01774152



yeah, i agree about that. joy division sounds more like
post punk to me than new order. but what the heck do i
know?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 15:07 [#01774164]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to r40f: #01774161



oh man, if you don't no one does :)


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-09 15:10 [#01774172]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ok, guys, break it up!


 

offline zazen on 2005-11-09 15:45 [#01774191]
Points: 184 Status: Regular



>well, for example punk and new wave were pretty
>massive in 80's and it was hardly boring stupid shit
>as the stuff that's on top of charts nowdays..even pop
>was much better in those days..it seems like people
>just don't care about what they listen to nowdays..

didnt bother reading rest of thread but ...

we have a distorted view of musical history.
only the best stuff from the 80's etc (even from the pop
genres) is remembered these days.
there was just as much throwaway cash-in crap around then,
but it does not get remembered.
Hence you are left with the illusion that even the crap from
the 80s is better than the crap now. I dont think this is
the case.

The only real change is that there is more of everything
now. More crap, more good stuff, more mainstream releases
and more underground releases.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 15:49 [#01774195]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to zazen: #01774191



well im not so much concerned about the music output then
and now, as much as people. im not 100% sure what's with
that in uk, but overhere it's a complete difference. for
example, when our first real punk band in 1978 made a gig
about 5000 attended, nowdays you don't see more than 100
people at any alternative gig..


 

offline oyvinto on 2005-11-09 15:56 [#01774201]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01774195 | Show recordbag



there are so many different scenes nowadays. in the old days
all the kids that wanted to be underground went to the same
places and listened to the same music. i think it's more
diverse now.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 16:01 [#01774206]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to oyvinto: #01774201



im not sure i agree on that completly. i mean obviously it
was different, but when i go out see gigs nowdays - i go see
a lot of all possible genres and i always (!!) meet same 50
people, so there.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-09 16:10 [#01774212]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to zazen: #01774191



i agree. before 80's music got popular again, all i heard
about was how much the 80's sucked. the music. the fasion.
the presidents. then all of a sudden 80's is fucking cool
again and I'm like, did you fucking forget about Poison and
Ratt and fucking Roxette and Debbie Gibson and Tiffany and
those stupid fucking hats with the flaps on the back and
muscle pants and the fucking brat pack?



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 16:12 [#01774213]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to evolume: #01774212



poison and roxette are more 90's stuff though. i liked
roxette quite a bit btw.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-09 16:21 [#01774217]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01774213



Oh man, i'm old. it's all a blur to me now.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-11-09 16:41 [#01774225]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01773477



It's Billy Joel’s fault.

In 1982 Billy Joel’s "52nd Street" was released, a new
format that gave the public better quality audio allegedly.
After that there was a boom in people buying their whole
record collections again. Record companies needed more
staff as all their back catalogue sprang to life and it was
the begining of re-issues at inflated costs to the gullible
public. Now, most record companies are totally inefficient
and know shit all about developing bands/artists. If your
first attempt in the public arena fails you are dropped.
That's why there's soo much crap about, not mp3s or the kids
being nonchalant or apathetic. The music industry is
rotten.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 16:44 [#01774226]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



god, billy joel sucks so much...


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 16:46 [#01774228]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to JivverDicker: #01774225



right. the thing is music industry could be doing the same
thing with good bands but since they're not concerned with
music itself at all that will never happen. not now when
they completly ruined everything. people who know nothing
about music should never be allowed to work in music
industry.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-11-09 16:56 [#01774234]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01774228



They don't know a good band when they see one. The Whole A&R
thing has been systematically been broken down over the
years. It's not too dissimilar to this.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 16:59 [#01774238]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to JivverDicker: #01774234



right, but people don't really resist..they just accept what
they get..


 

offline zazen on 2005-11-09 17:10 [#01774249]
Points: 184 Status: Regular



the attraction of being a succesful signed musical artist is
huge and seductive
* make music instead of doing a boring job *
* make lots of money *
* shag supermodels *
* snort miles and miles of coke *
* go down in history *
etc.

Hence the music scene is clogged up with millions of
hopefuls trying to make it.

Meanwhile its getting easier and easier to make 'good
enough' music, although 'really really good' music always
was and always will be hard to make.

End result: who has success and who doesnt is largely
random. Genuine talent and originality are easily lost
amoung the noise of millions of hopefuls.

The Lesson: Trying to make a living from music is like
buying a lottery ticket. Its fun to think about winning, and
you might win, but dont get too down if you dont.

Corrolary: Music Industry churns out whatever sells. Even
working that out is pretty hard. Did you know that 80% of
all released albums never make a profit?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-11-09 17:10 [#01774250]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01774238



Now you can have your own private rebellion in your bedroom
though. You don't need to listen to the radio or tv to get
what you want. You can find like minded people in a passive
way through the internet and go about normal life and feel
satisfied. It's less visible but it's the same as it allways
was.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-09 17:19 [#01774253]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to JivverDicker: #01774250



"You can find like minded people in a passive way through
the internet and go about normal life"

that is true, but doesn't it bother you to live among people
who don't think for themselves but just accept what rotten
people sell them? i know im bothered. i'd love to see some
decent gigs around here but no one wants to organize one
because it is certain they will never cover costs..those who
know music a bit better should start education music
audience though it's really hard to belive things could
change..


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-11-09 17:30 [#01774256]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01774253



The game has changed, but a goal is a goal. Khonnor is a
present hero in my eyes for doing his thing and getting
quotes like 'Magnificent' (new york times), 'Remarkable..
the sound of undiluted heartache' (the observer), ' Mitt liv
hade varit fattigare om jag inte hade fatt hora den' (6/6
Svenska Dagbladet)

His music is punk as fuck!

Punk is an ethos rather than a music style, DIY and that's
it.

That helps me think that it's not all bad.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-09 17:39 [#01774259]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



"that is true, but doesn't it bother you to live among
people
who don't think for themselves but just accept what rotten
people sell them? "

it bothers me, but it would bother me more if all these
ignorant sheep were into the same things as me.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-11-09 18:44 [#01774304]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



If one's just commenting on "pop music", a lot of the
"better" pop music is also quite retro, which isn't very
healthy, I don't suppose. I can't explain my point as I'm
too tired and a bit whipsy.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2005-11-09 19:07 [#01774323]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



It's your fault, tolstoyed.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-11-09 19:10 [#01774325]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



This has been a good read.

Jivver, yoy share my same sentiment about punk being a state
of mind.

Excellent! Carry on.

Oh, it's always nice to see someone shares my view about
pulp.

<3


 

offline nigel from marspan (United States Minor Outlying Islands) on 2005-11-09 19:54 [#01774344]
Points: 166 Status: Addict



your thoughts and ideas are just a blip. just enjoy the
things you do, and be greatful you can appricate things more
than most people ever will! :)


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-11-09 20:03 [#01774346]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to nigel: #01774344



stale.


 

offline nigel from marspan (United States Minor Outlying Islands) on 2005-11-09 20:26 [#01774350]
Points: 166 Status: Addict | Followup to JivverDicker: #01774346



got a better idea mate?


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-09 21:52 [#01774362]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01773477



whose


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-11-10 03:07 [#01774413]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to JivverDicker: #01774256



yes ofcourse, there's more modern music that i enjoy, it's
not artists fault by any means. there's plenty of great
stuff around, and lots of critics appreciate it as well,
it's just the majority of people not giving a fcuk about
it..even the ones they call themselves music connoisseurs.
and yes, punk isn't limited to one genre ofcourse.

hobbes, i was affraid of that..im working on it though.

evolume, "it bothers me, but it would bother me more if all
these
ignorant sheep were into the same things as me."

we are different then, i sure would love to see more people
appreciate good stuff :)


 


Messageboard index