Where's all the Yanks at? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 315 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index | Topic is closed
Where's all the Yanks at?
 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-09 10:49 [#01773938]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



I'm just curious why discussions like this exsist? Can any
of you actually do something about any of this? If so... do
you?

Who cares who is right or wrong because none of this is
going to change. America is stupid for putting everything
else above their own country. We should seal our boarders
and take care of our people the ones starving in the
streets. We should focus on our crime. And try to better
ourselves.

Instead we focus on every other country in the world for
whatever reason.

Then you have every other country that seems to use america
as a scape goat of sorts anytime something goes wrong. Those
countries should work on bettering themselves aswell. Maybe
this way people would get somewhere in life instead of
playing this bullshit game of politics.

Left right whocares. If one continuously devides and
catagorizes themselves then there can never be equality nor
can there ever be common ground.

Greed and Pride are whats killing this world. Not one
country... but most of the earth inhabitants. Stuck up,
paumpus, materialistic, self centered, selfish twats.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-09 10:52 [#01773944]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



you are of course correct virgilpushington.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 10:59 [#01773951]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01773938



i disagree and i think the point of discussing politics is
so that there is a dialogue about the things that directly
effect you in government. this might come as a surprise,
but you are supposed to pay attention to what's happening in
your country. being ignorant about it is being part of the
problem. and once something bad happens to you that the
government was or wasn't supposed to take care of, you'll
start worrying about politics.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 11:01 [#01773953]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to vacant: #01773919



your comments in this thread are ridiculous. you have no
clue what you're talking about for someone who thinks they
know the truth. "the big lie" you're fucking absurd.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-09 11:02 [#01773955]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



vacant = theo himself ?


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:04 [#01773958]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



i mostly agree with all that, though i think a healthy
selfishness is underrated. a righteously selfish person is
inherently concerned with the good of his brothers, because
it translates into his own good in the long run.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-09 11:06 [#01773965]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01773951



Oh trust me i do follow things. I am talking about these
discussions of pissing all over each other based on what one
is or isnt doing.

Example: Look at campagns nowadays. It is about bettering
something or directly saying how one could better something
it is about making the other party look bad. Its pathetic.

But anyways my point was mainly that its easy to be a living
room quarterback its quite something else to get actively
involved. Discussion is merely but one step in bettering
something. Action is the next logical step.

I wonder how much people here actually do. I am being honest
and sincere. I sign petitions, i write senators/state reps
etc etc.

Actions speak louder than words. See the opening sentences
of my previous post.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-09 11:06 [#01773966]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to virginpusher: #01773938



Discussions like this are important. Public opinion is
hugely important; indeed, public opinion is seen by
governments like your own as "the great beast" that "needs
to be tamed".

The only reason apparent to many that America has so many
interests overseas, especially in the middle east, is that
securing the region's natural resources will secure the
American way of life for perhaps another few decades, at
most. "The End of Suburbia" is a great documentary on this
topic (the fact that natural resources are about to run
out).

You might call it "this bullshit game of politics", but
unfortunately this bullshit game is what runs the world.

Also, something to think about is that perhaps it is the
American "way of life" (capitalism in its most extreme form)
that is proliferating this greed, materialism,
self-centeredness, selfishness and over-zealous pride.
Please don't disregard this as an anti-american rant by me;
if you think about it, the whole American concept is that
everyone can make it and therefore you have to put yourself
before everyone else, trample on anyone you have to, in
order to make your way to the top and make money with which
you can buy unneccesary luxuries and act even more
materialistically and self-centered.

This attitude, which basically amounts to pure and utter
disrespect and disregard for others, is then exported in the
mass media to other parts of the world.

This is why I have such distaste for America. It is America,
in every sense of the word, that is killing the world:
- promoting this selfish way-of-life
- invading countries mercilessly to secure natural
resources
- using far more natural resources than is necessary, for
cars with 4+ litre engines, etc, and not imposing laws to
curb the use of oil
- polluting the world more than any other nation and
refusing to impose laws regarding pollution on big business
and automobile owners


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2005-11-09 11:07 [#01773967]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to vacant: #01773919



OK - I've read the link. It contains nothing remotely
convincing.

I'd also point you here, where it's clearly stated
that Commentary Magazine (the source of the article you
linked) is "considered a leading voice of the American
Jewish community and the neoconservative movement".

Hmm. Considering that the neoconservative movement
orchestrated the war on Iraq, and that the American Jewish
community is one of its most clamorous supporters, I'd say
your article is far from unbiased.

There you go. I think that I've "logically refuted" your
argument.

Now, I've read your link, you can now do me the courtesy of
downloading and watching the documentary "The Power Of
Nightmares".

Logically refute that.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-09 11:08 [#01773970]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to vacant: #01773958



i mostly agree with all that, though i think a healthy
selfishness is underrated.


THE AMERICAN WAY, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN!

great. just great. point proven.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:09 [#01773974]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



and of course ignore the second part of the statement, ie.
the point.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-09 11:11 [#01773977]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to vacant: #01773958



oh yeah and that link you posted, i stopped reading once he
wrote:

"Iraq is continuing, and in some areas expanding its
chemical, biological, nuclear, and missile programs contrary
to UN resolutions."

The intelligence agencies of Britain, Germany, Russia,
China, Israel, and—yes—France all agreed with this
judgment.


I know for a FACT that the Germans opposed this idea,
tooth-and-nail, in the UN. Were they to do this while their
intelligence agencies knew otherwise is unthinkable.

Absolutely nothing in that article is cited. No
sources given at all. It's pure bullshit. And emotive
bullshit at that - the fact that you called the link
"LAZY_LOGIC" is both ironic and indicative of your
dillusion.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2005-11-09 11:12 [#01773978]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01773965



Actually, Virginpusher, I think it's really vitally
important to debate like this. It is possible to influence
other peoples' opinions for the better by doing so. It's far
better and more constructive that people discuss politics
than football.

And I do *do* stuff, but I'm not vulgar enough to list the
things I do on an internet messageboard just so that I can
feel self-satisfied and better than everyone else.



 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:12 [#01773979]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



your 'refutation' is just an attack on the person. why don't
you try the content


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:13 [#01773981]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



you know for a fact, show me. i want to learn and grow like
a flower


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-09 11:14 [#01773983]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to vacant: #01773979



Excuse me? I not once mentioned the author of the article. I
commented exclusively on its content. Start making sense.

and start using the follow-up button as well, christ.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-09 11:15 [#01773984]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01773966



Also, something to think about is that perhaps it is the

American "way of life" (capitalism in its most extreme form)

that is proliferating this greed, materialism,
self-centeredness, selfishness and over-zealous pride.
Please don't disregard this as an anti-american rant by me;

if you think about it, the whole American concept is that
everyone can make it and therefore you have to put yourself

before everyone else, trample on anyone you have to, in
order to make your way to the top and make money with which
you can buy unneccesary luxuries and act even more
materialistically and self-centered.


I can agree with wholeheartedly. This place is widely
materialistic to unbelievable proportions. When you think of
how people all over are starving and struggle to make basic
needs (housing, food) and then you look at 1 car with
$30,000
of pure accessories.... its mind blowing. Trust me i do see
america as evil moreover and it shows in the overall life
style and attitudes of most.

I think the whole "blaming america for all of the worlds
problems" is quite rediculous though. Do we cause our share
of trouble. Yes. It is just popular to hate our country. If
we all did extensive research we could find crap about every
country and government. We need to stop passing the blame
around and start taking responsibility for our actions.
Everyone not just america but every country.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-09 11:15 [#01773985]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to vacant: #01773981



Right so, coming up in one second.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:16 [#01773986]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



i can't keep up with your speed, plus this board isn't
designed well enough for me to care to discover its
features. when whoever talked about them being jewish
neocons, that was the personal attack. now there is content
discussed, and you say you know for a fact that the germans
didn't do something the article said they did, so i would
like to learn this from you, so prove it to me


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-09 11:17 [#01773987]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



oh wait, yeah this is what i was agreeing to:

Left right whocares. If one continuously devides and
catagorizes themselves then there can never be equality nor
can there ever be common ground.

Greed and Pride are whats killing this world. Not one
country... but most of the earth inhabitants. Stuck up,
paumpus, materialistic, self centered, selfish twats.


I'm a big fan of open debate.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 11:17 [#01773989]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01773984



stop passing the blame? the US is by far the most
responsible for the most destruction. we're number one.
why shouldn't we be blamed?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-09 11:18 [#01773990]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to virginpusher: #01773984



The rest of us have long embraced the idea of laws regarding
pollution, have signed up for treaties like Kyoto, etc etc.

The reason it's popular to hate America right now is because
there's widespread knowledge and information about the shit
that's been going down. The best you get in other, developed
countries is corruption, which is nothing when compared to
utter disregard to other nations of the world.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:20 [#01773993]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



why should americans feel guilty about their success? you're
right, people should take their own personal responsibility
and worry about their own problems. unfortunately the middle
east is the world's problem and america's the only thing in
the world who's giving it even halfway a serious thought.
what is europe good for in this instance? when iran nukes
something, who will be expected to deal with them?


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-09 11:23 [#01773997]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01773987



thats my main point that i wanted to get across with that. I
run on tagents too often.

ahah! I dont justify actions but i am honest enough with
myself to realize that the only way to change things are
through action! Debates are good and fine but are merely a
stepping stone to action.

I think manicminer [#01773978] was the only one to touch on
that.

Our followup system is pure shit at this board and make
these discussions nearly impossible with the quick rate of
posting and sheer volume of posts in a given time


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-09 11:26 [#01774002]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01773997



the followup is badass, but some sort of integrated 'quote'
feature in addition would be SUPERB! cause it's tough if
someone has a multi-part post or you want to reply to more
than one dude/dudette.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-09 11:28 [#01774007]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01773990



haha, kyoto.

i agree with the concept completely. it is rediculous how
poorly we treat the only place we have to live. but, it
doesn't really count if your country signs the accord but
then totally doesn't follow the guidelines of the treaty.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 11:28 [#01774008]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



Left right whocares. If one continuously devides and
catagorizes themselves then there can never be equality nor
can there ever be common ground.


because moderates (ie most democrats) do absolutely fuck all
about anything. the extreme right is in power, not the
everybody-is-equal club. people in the middle aren't more
fair - they're just people who don't take enough action.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2005-11-09 11:32 [#01774011]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to vacant: #01773986



If you read my post properly, you'll see that I never
referred to "Jewish neocons".


 

offline rasec from mty (Mexico) on 2005-11-09 11:32 [#01774012]
Points: 654 Status: Regular



z - u - L - u

that's the way you say zuLu


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2005-11-09 11:35 [#01774015]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to vacant: #01773993



And I hardly think pointing out that the magazine from which
the article was taken is biased amounts to a "personal
attack" on its author.

You really are spouting some half-baked tripe.


 

offline rasec from mty (Mexico) on 2005-11-09 11:36 [#01774018]
Points: 654 Status: Regular



virginpusher said:

Greed and Pride are whats [sic] killing this world.
Not one country.


so true...

and poLLution must be there too... though it sometimes goes
hand by hand with greed...


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:42 [#01774020]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



I'm a 'yank.'
I still believe that Bush and his good ole' boys club are a
bunch of ignorant, selfish, arrogant assholes who care for
nothing but the continuing profit of their businesses.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:42 [#01774021]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



not that this is in any way a real debate or series of
logical arguments, but manicminer you should read at least
this LAZY_TITLE


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 11:47 [#01774023]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to vacant: #01774021



did you read it? because the point manicminer was correctly
making was that the article you linked to was biased in
content and was written to serve an agenda and trick sheep
like you into being limbaugh-regurgitators.


 

offline rasec from mty (Mexico) on 2005-11-09 11:50 [#01774024]
Points: 654 Status: Regular



united nations is the united states' bitch


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:52 [#01774026]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



how is the content biased? no one of you has proven any of
it wrong yet.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:55 [#01774029]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



unfortunately the middle
east is the world's problem and america's the only thing in
the world who's giving it even halfway a serious thought.
what is europe good for in this instance? when iran nukes
something, who will be expected to deal with them?


it is a worse problem than it should be BECAUSE of our
"giving it even a halfway serious thought."

We half-assed it, thinking only of how we could profit from
our involvement and have made it a greater problem than it
should have been for the rest of the world.



 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-11-09 11:55 [#01774030]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to vacant: #01774026



Quite a few people have you thick bigot.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 11:57 [#01774031]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



what are you referring to? the closest was someone saying
germany didn't do something the article said they did, and
then no followup/proof


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 11:59 [#01774032]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to vacant: #01774031



that means that there was exactly as much proof as you
presented - none.

you're in deep denial! this shit just happened a few years
ago! where have you been?


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2005-11-09 12:02 [#01774036]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to vacant: #01774031



LOOK AT WHO PUBLISHED THE ARTICLE. I gave you a link showing
what kind of magazine that is. Surely you are intelligent
enough to see that this publication has an agenda?

Show us an article from a reliable, impartial source and
maybe we'll take it seriously.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 12:03 [#01774037]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



you guys are pathetic, i'm making myself such an easy target
and you don't do anything with it. no, the article was
presented as an interesting read, not proof of anything...
and it was issued with a challenge, to refute anything it
says. artificially putting the burden of proof on you all.
so far no one has undertaken the challenge in any kind of
meaningful way. if your side is so airtight, why not put me
in my place and tear apart this "obviously biased" neocon
claptrap?


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 12:04 [#01774039]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



you still don't get that just pointing at the identity of
the writer does not disprove anything in the content, do
you? did you read the thing about ad hominem arguments? it's
philo 101 stuff duke. step yo game up


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 12:05 [#01774040]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to vacant: #01774037



because the burden of proof is ON YOU, that's how that
expression works! you're the one with the historical
revisionist claims from some propaganda editorial! you
prove it!


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 12:07 [#01774041]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



tbe burden of proof isn't on me because the whole point of
the exercise (outlined in the post with the link to the
article) was to challenge any or all of you to disprove it.
it doesn't matter if i even agree with the article (which is
irrelevant to the exercise)


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 12:08 [#01774042]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



you keep calling it revisionist, you obviously believe it
very strongly... so present the evidence for your belief.
why should that be hard for you?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-09 12:09 [#01774045]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



because i'm not here to play games with some twat telling me
to do his excercises. you're really a joke.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-09 12:10 [#01774046]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i can't get to the goddamn article because it seems to be
hosted on someone's fuckin pocket watch.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-09 12:10 [#01774047]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to vacant: #01774039



it's funny though because in your ad hominem link, they
point at a priest who's argument against abortion is based
in religion. his argument is wrong because it presupposes
the existence of God and a standard morality. As a priest,
he is required to follow the word of his God. So pointing
to the priest is really just indirectly pointing to his
flawed logic, from the standpoint of a non christian or
catholic or whatever.

I guess in a way, it is unfair to assume the priest's
argument is based in religion, but the fact that he is a
priest kinda dictates the source of his argument.

am i making sense here. it is a poor example of an ad
hominem argument, is what I'm saying, i guess. sorta.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-11-09 12:12 [#01774049]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



i guess my overall point is that you guys spout lots of
bullshit, brash bullshit... calling things revisionist,
working on assumptions that you have forgotten your reasons
for, if you ever had them. step the fuck back and refine
thyself. i need to do the same for myself of course, and i
know nothing on message boards is serious so why am i
bothering, but what can i say


 


Messageboard index