Smoking bans | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 381 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614130
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Smoking bans
 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-10-09 07:00 [#01744964]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



looks like the UK is going to get a complete ban on smoking
after all. read here

i think this is a shit idea, if you don't like smoke, don't
put yourself in a smokey environment

does anyone live in a country where a smoking ban has
already come into place? whats it like?



 

online big from lsg on 2005-10-09 07:03 [#01744966]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



like living under a fascist regime


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 07:08 [#01744970]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



the landlord of my local pub will never ban smoking in there
cos he would lose practically all his customers


 

offline Xeron from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 07:13 [#01744975]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular



i think you should rephrase your post to, people who don't
like the smell of smoke shouldn't place themselves in a
smokey environment.

I don't smoke but I don't mind the smell.


 

offline Xeron from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 07:14 [#01744976]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular | Followup to Xeron: #01744975



for i_x_ten


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-10-09 07:14 [#01744977]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular



I smoke passively; it's free and I love it.


 

offline ToXikFB on 2005-10-09 07:15 [#01744979]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker



big deal, theres a ban over here


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-10-09 07:17 [#01744982]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Xeron: #01744975



why does that need rephrasing?


 

offline Xeron from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 07:22 [#01744991]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular | Followup to i_x_ten: #01744982



it doesn't i just wanted attention. :P


 

offline Phobiazero from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2005-10-09 07:32 [#01745001]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



sweden is like that already.....

pros: no disgusting smoke
cons: all other smells appears... like farts


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 07:33 [#01745005]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



I swap between 'it's a good idea', no 'it's a bad idea'. In
theorry it's a good idea, no wait, in theorry it's a bad
idea, perrsonally, since I don't smoke it's a good idea, no
but wait, I like the smell of smoke kinda, so it's a bad
idea. I think rreally... I don't carre.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 07:35 [#01745008]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



If I cast a vote it would be: Don't ban it.


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-10-09 07:35 [#01745009]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to Xeron: #01744991



you just wanted to reach 3000 points quicker didn't you?


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 07:39 [#01745014]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01745009



Prrobably.


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-10-09 07:48 [#01745017]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01745014



it makes me sick.

he'll probably get to 5,000 and then get bored and leave to
start over again at WATMM.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 07:50 [#01745018]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01745017



what on earrth


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 07:52 [#01745019]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



some places need that smell of smoke... particularly jazz
clubs.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 07:53 [#01745020]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



if you don't like smoke, don't put yourself in a smokey
environment


Do you not see what is wrrong with that statement? I don't
rreally want to get into that arrgument though.


 

offline Taffmonster from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-10-09 07:55 [#01745021]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker



looks like i quit just in time then eh


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 07:58 [#01745023]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



can't wait for it to come into effect, then I can eat in a
pub and go to bars/clubs without passively smoking. The
stink of smoke on my clothes after going to a club is
disgusting, god knows what its doing to my lungs.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-09 08:10 [#01745033]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to i_x_ten: #01744964 | Show recordbag



i think this is a shit idea, if you don't like smoke,
don't
put yourself in a smokey environment


so.. if someone who doesn't like smoke wants to go to some
concert with some amazing artist, and there are smoking
people there, he just shouldn't go? and what about
asthmatics?

smokers can be in the same room as someone who doesn't like
smoke or is an asthmatic, but the asthmatic at least can't
be in the same room as the smoker. smokers have a choice.

basically, if you're not trolling, you're either an
inconsiderate asshole or just stupid.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-10-09 08:21 [#01745040]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01745033



IT'S A BAR/CLUB/PUB.

IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SMOKE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN A
FUCKING PUB.

How's that for inconsiderate? It would be naive to view it
in that way, as sensationalist as it may seem, because:

People smoke in pubs. if you don't smoke, you don't know the
pleasure of smoking while having a drink.

People who don't smoke can go and set up their own
smoke-free pubs if they want. You could say "well, then
they'll have a difficult time bringing their friends out,
nobody's friend circles don't include smokers, and the
smoke-free clubs/pubs will go out of business"... Is this
really better than all nightspots going out of business,
because people don't want to travel all the way to be
stripped of their right to smoke and pay extra money for
price-inflated drink, so they just drink at home?

I had a long discussion with an english guy and an irish
girl last night outside the Duke (pub).. they were for and I
was against.. the only pro of the smoking ban we could all
agree on was that it has a nice effect in creating an extra
atmosphere and venue for social interaction, away from the
music and noise of the actual venue.

Still, my sentiment remains firm and strong: if you don't
smoke, and have a problem with smoke, what the fuck are you
doing in a smokey venue. It's your own problem.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-10-09 08:22 [#01745043]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #01745040



The first point of that post, "People smoke in pubs", is
absolutely weak. I was pointing at the tradition of it.

I can expand on the tradition, its importance, and the ill
effects of its abolition if necessary. I probably will
anyway, just to attempt to redeem myself after that awful
post.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 08:27 [#01745046]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



i smoke + i dont give a fuck if pubs ban smoking, its up to
them what they do.... i just wont go there anymore ill go to
a pub where u can smoke

cos theyll always exist because ppl like me will want to go
to em.

its simple really


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-10-09 08:32 [#01745050]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



smoking is half the enjoyment of going to pubs. bans will
just make it dull


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-10-09 08:36 [#01745053]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to steve mcqueen: #01745046



it's not the pubs banning smoking you dumb shit, it's the
government outlawing it in workplaces. So in no pub will you
be able to smoke.


 

offline Taffmonster from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-10-09 08:41 [#01745057]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker



i dont smoke anymore (i quit like 3/4 weeks ago) but they
banned smoking in my uni nightclub before i did and just
went round smoking and if i got caught id stub it out.

passive smoker people can be annoying, the amount that tell
me passive smoking is worse than smoking is hillarious

im starting to notice the smell of smoke and i dont liek it
but if people wanna smoke its up to them i think a band is
stupid i think they should just ahve seperation
ie half smoking half non smoking

however
non smokers shouldnt ahve to avoid pubs because they dont
like smoke, saying they should is frankly fucking retarded,
but smokers shouldnt ahve to avoid pubs

WHERES THE FUKING COMPRAMISE!!!!



 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 08:42 [#01745058]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01745040



People who don't smoke can go and set up their own
smoke-free pubs if they want.


What the fucking hell arre you on sometimes. No they can't,
I don't smoke and I as surre as hell can't just go and set
up my own smoke frree pub, norr would I want to. AS IF
people just won't go to the pub because they can't smoke. Do
you think forr a million yearrs everry smokerr is going to
stay at home because they can't have a cig with theirr pint,
don't be stupid. The time will come, and forr the betterr,
when kids will weight things up when it comes to having
theirr firrst cigarrette and decide it's just not worrth it.
I'm not against smoking, perrsonally I don't carre, but I
underrstand and supporrt a perrsons rright to enjoy a night
out without getting lung cancerr. Passive smoking exists and
it's a killerr.


 

offline ToXikFB on 2005-10-09 08:44 [#01745059]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker



smoking or non smoking sir.?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-09 08:44 [#01745060]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01745040 | Show recordbag



yeah, your right over everyone elses, right?

fuck off.

I guess you'd understand if you knew someone with asthma..
it's effective exclusion from society. asthma doesn't have
to be as large a (social) handicap, but with smoke every
fucking where you go it's the same as being excluded.

how'd you feel if all your friends went out and you couldn't
go because you had asthma and people insisted on killing you
"passively?"

..and no, I don't have asthma myself, but I know someone who
does, and they've been excluded from going out until
recently when they banned smoking in pubs and bars here.

if you can't have fun in a pub without a smoke, you may want
to re-consider fun.

I'm saying the same to you as you say to all the people who
don't like smoke: fuck off!


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 08:56 [#01745066]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taffmonster: #01745057



the amount that tell me passive smoking is worse than
smoking is hillarious


The mix of both mainstrream and sidestrream smoke that you
brreathe passively is morre harrmful than mainstrream smoke
alone, so passive smoking is morre harrmful, howeverr the
smokerrs themselves arre exposed to both and arre clearrly
at grreaterr rrisk.


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2005-10-09 08:56 [#01745067]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



try nicotine beer


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-10-09 09:00 [#01745071]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I don't mind smokers, really.. I do think it stinks like
hell, though, but I won't say anything.

let's face it though - smokers are being had by the
government but especially by the tobacco corporations..

..SUCKERRRRRS!


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-10-09 09:21 [#01745083]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01745058



I'm not saying that being a non-smoker empowers you to have
the finances, know-how and general ability to establish a
pub. Fine, so you don't. Others do.

And i'm not saying that EVERY smoker will stay at home, but
we've seen here the vast majority doing just that. The pubs
have been robbed of their atmosphere, they're running out of
money and many are shutting down. Nightlife in Dublin's not
what it used to be, and it's because of this ban.

Drunken Mastah, I have asthma, and although I do smoke, I
only ever have problems with venues using a lot of dry ice.


And to you, and people like you, I will repeat your "Fuck
off". As I said, nightlife here has been affected very badly
because of this bullshit and I'm not happy about it.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 09:27 [#01745092]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



this bullshit. what bullshit... the goverrment eventually
trrying to prrotect people frrom a verry serrious dangerr to
theirr health? just because smoking in pubs is trradition
doesn't mean that change isn't needed. smokerrs will have to
accept that they can't smoke inside of pubs on a night out,
which can't be harrd in comparrison what non-smokerrs have
currrrently to accept on a night out.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 09:31 [#01745097]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



yourr addiction to cigarrettes and the need it brrings to be
able to feed it at all possible times is clouding yourr
judgement. smoke doesn't add atmospherre and if it did why
not just invest in some smoke machines.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 09:32 [#01745098]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01745092



to what non-smokerrs*


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-09 09:34 [#01745102]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01745083 | Show recordbag



if you have asthma and still smoke, you're stupid.

oh, and.. btw.. does this argument seem sound to you?

"I will hurt you because I think it is fun"

also.. "it's tradition."

so's beating (or other severe things) your wife if she does
something wrong in certain countries.. if traditions and
customs never changed, women would still be in the kitchen,
we wouldn't be allowed to choose who to marry, england would
be invaded by norwegians who raped and pillaged your towns,
killing people over minor things would be allowed... well,
that's a bit hard and possibly not even true, but you see my
point?

sometimes things have to hit closer to home for people to
"get it." Here's a challenge: for the next month, you can't
go out with your friends.. at least not to any pubs or other
places that allow smoking - see how you like it.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-10-09 09:40 [#01745106]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01745097



Smoke machines smell and taste awful - I'm not talking about
the visual aesthetic of a smokey atmosphere, but the smell
and general stuffyness of it. I've always enjoyed the smokey
atmosphere in a pub, since I was a child. I only started
smoking cigarettes, properly, two years ago.



 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-09 10:00 [#01745114]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



this topic isn't close enough to my hearrt to use any morre
enerrgy discussing it so i'm going make like a virginpusher
and get out of herre. i'll just end by saying: Yourr
comments arre completely devoid of any worth, nothing
morre than the rramblings of a selfish child who can't have
it all his way


 

offline lumpenprol from San Francisco on 2005-10-09 11:14 [#01745143]
Points: 76 Status: Lurker



God I hate no-smoking zealots. I'm a non-smoker, smoked for
a year while I lived abroad, but I think a ban on smoking in
pubs/clubs/bars is completely moronic. Just another
"sign-of-the-times", ie. our over-litigious/body
obsessed/paranoid and hypochondriacal times. We have a
smoking ban in bars here, enacted several years ago. We also
have a helmet law for motorcycles, they've taken the "monkey
bars" out of children's playgrounds because of a fear of
lawsuits, etc. etc.

People like redrum who argue that people should just make
non-smoking bars if they want them are absolutely correct.
This is precisely the sort of situation in which a laissez
faire (sp?) approach is warranted. If there was a market
demand for such places, they would exist. Obviously, not
enough non-smokers frequent bars - drinking is another
health-damaging activity after all - to make such places
profitable. Until such a time as there is a demand for this
sort of place, non-smokers should just stfu and stop trying
to meddle with other's enjoyment.

I do agree with a ban on smoking in workplaces, it makes
perfect sense - you have to be at your job, but going to a
bar is a matter of choice. As for the people working at
bars/pubs who are non-smokers and are worried about the
effects of constant second-hand smoke, they should just find
a different occupation. The smoke in bars should be seen as
an occupational hazard, just as ear-damaging decibels are
for those who work at concert venues, and STDs are for
hookers.



 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-09 11:32 [#01745154]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



>t's not the pubs banning smoking you dumb shit,
>it's the government outlawing it in workplaces. So in no
pub
>will you be able to smoke.

no need to be rude really
and i bet u a quid i'll still be able to smoke in my local


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2005-10-09 12:29 [#01745178]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



there is one of those wetherspoons "Llyod" bars in my city.
It's non smoking. If you want a fag, you have to go out onto
the bit at the front,outside and light up.
inside there is no smoking, which is good.
you can actually smell the open log fire, your clothes
don't stink the next day, so if you only wore them for a
couple of hours to go out on a friday night, you can wear
them again on the saturday daytime.

the whole idea is so that people who work in bars are not
subjected to carcinogens. doesn't sound like a 'shit idea'
really.


 

offline avart from nomo' on 2005-10-09 12:37 [#01745184]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker | Followup to i_x_ten: #01744964



"does anyone live in a country where a smoking ban has
already come into place? whats it like?"

...like pure heaven - now we just have to ban it everywhere
else too or put helmets on the smokers so we get rid of the
stupidity once and for all.


 

offline Loopz from Brum Land on 2005-10-09 12:48 [#01745187]
Points: 526 Status: Regular



I only smoke when i go to a gig or to certain pubs! I
personally would love to have a smoke free pub but i'm not
too sure about gigs/club venues. My views have changed since
becoming a father though. Maybe they should ban children in
pubs as well. haha.

So i say ban smoking in Pubs
Leave clubs/gig venues alone.

I dont mind going outside for a smoke if i want one.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-09 13:34 [#01745213]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to lumpenprol: #01745143 | Show recordbag



don't reproduce.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-10-09 14:01 [#01745245]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



"Smoking beans"? what?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-10-09 14:15 [#01745251]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to r40f: #01745245



cool!


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-10-09 14:24 [#01745257]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



"if you don't like smoke, don't
put yourself in a smokey environment"

if i don't smoke - i'm not allowed to have a beer ?
bullshit.

smoking is still allowed in polish pubs, i have no problem
with it myself. or maybe i should, since passive smoking is
said to be worse for your health than the active ?



 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-10-09 15:01 [#01745272]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



despite everything (and what anyone says), smoking is
damn cool (as an image thing)

and i say that to bring some light to the somewhat gritty
personal-onslaught-esque mood in this thread. i guess health
is quite a serious issue though. bye!


 


Messageboard index