An idea | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 408 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
An idea
 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-09-22 07:47 [#01730172]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



forr the message boarrd.

what would be cool would be if you could select eitherr page
1 2 etc... without going into the thrread. Forr example

[Spam] My shit new trrack [1] [2] [3]


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-09-22 07:48 [#01730174]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



EY EY EY


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-09-22 07:48 [#01730175]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



It's just crazy enough to work!


 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-22 07:49 [#01730176]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker



WATMM style, nahhhhh.......


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-09-22 07:50 [#01730177]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker



seconded


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-09-22 07:51 [#01730178]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to tridenti: #01730176



Forrget WATMM, it's a fantastic idea. I'm sick of all this
going into the thrread just to get to the second page
bullshit! And don't say 'make it newest post firrst' 'cause
I won't. That's just wrrong.


 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-22 07:55 [#01730181]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01730178



I was joking obviously, I'd like it too. Phobz is working on
xlt v2, perhaps he has already planned it...


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-09-22 07:58 [#01730185]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01730177



anus seconded


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-22 09:00 [#01730270]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I suggested this before, but for some reason it never
happened.. phobs just said that everyone should have 200
posts per page, and it would be "ok."

basically, though, I second Carl.


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2005-09-22 09:04 [#01730280]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict



what, you got 'oldest messages first' selected?

hahahahaha


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-22 09:30 [#01730322]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



`


Attached picture

 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-09-22 09:32 [#01730327]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Morton: #01730280



having newest message first is like trying to watch memento
in reverse.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-09-22 09:33 [#01730330]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01730172



No, Anus


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-22 09:34 [#01730332]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



Boobar


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2005-09-22 09:38 [#01730339]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker



fubar.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-22 09:40 [#01730343]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



marsbar


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-09-22 12:40 [#01730698]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



NO BARRS!!!


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-09-22 12:41 [#01730699]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



No, honestly, I can't see any negatives to this at all.


 

offline nacmat on 2005-09-22 12:44 [#01730702]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



its the worst idea in the world of ideas

you got oldest messages first??


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-09-22 12:45 [#01730703]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Morton: #01730280



i do too. makes more sense to read a thread in sequencial
order.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-22 12:48 [#01730711]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



LOOK


Attached picture

 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-09-22 12:54 [#01730725]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



YOU STUPID FUCKING IDIOTS, you don't rread book backwarrds
do you? NO. If you leave off at chapterr 4 in a book you
want be able to open on that chapterr don't you? YES, not
flick thrrough each page again until you find the spot.
Motherrfuckerrs.


 

offline FlyAgaric from the discovery (Africa) on 2005-09-22 12:55 [#01730728]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular



good idea. a page takes ages to load on 56k.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-09-22 12:56 [#01730733]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01730711



HAHAHA CHI KNEE MAKE ME SLEEPIE


 


Messageboard index