|
|
cie jiks mawp
from motion to descend (Australia) on 2005-09-09 18:00 [#01718951]
Points: 1171 Status: Lurker
|
|
I know this topic has occurred vbefore. Forgive me, i grind up against the missing search function at all times. . .
Are they worth the $ or are they just gay?
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2005-09-09 18:13 [#01718957]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
gay!
(i actually don't know)
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2005-09-09 18:15 [#01718958]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
Right now I'm using one that I am sort of renting for school. It's an older g4 model, but it's pretty nice. The only thing I don't like is the keyboard, which seems kind of flimsy, but probably no worse than other laptop keys. I guess I will need to get used to it more. It seems about as stable as desktop-style g4s, but Internet Explorer has fudged up a few times. Either way I think it's less crash prone than any sort of w\Windows system I've used.
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2005-09-09 18:20 [#01718959]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
that "w\" is because of the shitty keyboard, I swear.
|
|
cie jiks mawp
from motion to descend (Australia) on 2005-09-09 18:21 [#01718961]
Points: 1171 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #01718958
|
|
Are you running any decent apps on it Q4Z2X?
|
|
vlari
from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-09-09 18:26 [#01718967]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular
|
|
the keyboard's a bit flimsy, yes. but all in all they are pretty great. I was thinking about buying one this summer, but I found that the need for a laptop wasn't that pressing. I therefore opted for the G5 iMac, which is compact enough to take with me in case somebody would actually hire me to play at a gig (well, the 17" version, which I didn't get btw. the 20" was too tempting).
If you need a lappy, then i think the powerbook should do it, but I recommend that you compare it with the iBook, cause that one's pretty great too
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2005-09-09 18:26 [#01718968]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
Not audiowise, but stuff like Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, generally graphics software.
|
|
cie jiks mawp
from motion to descend (Australia) on 2005-09-09 18:35 [#01718986]
Points: 1171 Status: Lurker
|
|
How does photoshop run? which version?
Are you using a 1.5 or 1.67ghz model?
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2005-09-09 18:39 [#01718992]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
photoshop cs, as well as the rest of the 'cs suite'. It runs well so far but I really haven't done much with extremely gigantic files so I can't form a definitive opinion yet. I think it's only 1 ghz, as it is a year or so old.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-09-10 09:22 [#01719282]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's be faster than 1ghz if only a year old. i got mine mid-2003 and it's 1.25ghz.
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2005-09-10 09:54 [#01719306]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
Well that's what it says in the 'about this mac' thing.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-09-10 10:01 [#01719311]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #01719306
|
|
it'll be older than a year, then. i think the 1ghz ones were standard in 2002 or early 2003?
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-09-10 10:05 [#01719313]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
btw, trick with macs is lots of ram. i just upgraded from 512MB to 1.25GB in mine and jeesus everything is /so/ much faster.
i've seen people with old clamshell g3 ibooks (i.e. 300mhz or something), that's a machine which is over 5 or 6 years old now i think, running the latest and greatest apps and latest macosx, with as much RAM stuffed in it it'll take, doing graphics work at perfectly acceptable speeds.
macs depreciate a lot less than pc's; or at least, used to before they got hugely popular (think the statement still holds true, just not quite so much), so in many senses a better investment.
|
|
Messageboard index
|