|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2005-08-11 14:37 [#01692160]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict
|
|
its the one called track
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-08-11 14:41 [#01692163]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker
|
|
downloading time: 50 sec
listening time: 3 minuts
comment: i'm sorry i don't like it
why?
because there are too much noises
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-08-11 14:44 [#01692166]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Being perfectly honest. It's rubbish. The sound quality is terrible. Malstrom used as a filter makes everything sound similar. The levels are fucked, um and I didn't like it. (Listened twice in case I missed something first time round but I think I have covered everything)
|
|
yann_g
from now on 2005-08-11 15:11 [#01692192]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker
|
|
i like it
|
|
thecurbcreeper
from United States on 2005-08-11 15:13 [#01692194]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker
|
|
while i agree the sound quality isn't very good, i still enjoyed it
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2005-08-11 16:47 [#01692303]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict
|
|
i uploaded a version i was mucking about with a auto-filter on so that is why you have crap muffled sound. i have just put the clean version up.
ecnadniarb: thanks for listening, i used logic for this with a AU granular plugin.
tridenti: thanks for listening yann_g: thanks for listening thecurbcreeper: thanks for listening
|
|
sirmailbox
from chicago area (United States) on 2005-08-12 02:14 [#01692523]
Points: 213 Status: Lurker
|
|
Whatever happened to hosting an mp3 like normal? Why do I have to download a fucking m3u PLAYLIST that consists of one file that times out on connection? I'm angry at the website, not you. I know it's not your fault.
Anyway I can't listen to it or anything else from this zebox site. Maybe it's cause I have winamp 2.9?
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2005-08-12 06:49 [#01692766]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to sirmailbox: #01692523
|
|
i dunno im using itunes and it work well for me
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-08-12 10:09 [#01693076]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
It sounds better but it still sounds completely unstructured and random. As though you have a really basic track and just have a bunch of random effects modules going. The fact you call it a texture track doesn't really excuse it.
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2005-08-13 01:22 [#01693580]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01693076
|
|
just trying something different, rather than just melody and beats. it get a bit boring after a while.
|
|
KADO
from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-08-13 01:43 [#01693584]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular
|
|
I liked some of the sounds you used.....The beats are nice and crunchy....Its cool how it seems to be on the edge of breaking into something more structured, like the beginnings of a melody at 1:06, only to be smashed to pieces again by chaotic sound.
I've never tried making a track like that, I bet its quite interesting and fun.
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2005-08-13 13:05 [#01694036]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to KADO: #01693584
|
|
thanks
its not fun to make becuase of the work involved but the final product is worth it
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2005-08-13 14:41 [#01694092]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
hm... i like it. a bit too much of the same bouncing sound and i'm not fond of the loud clicks in the middle. but otherwise, i think it sounds like a very good start.
|
|
Messageboard index
|