|
|
scup_bucket
from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-07-18 14:19 [#01667071]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular
|
|
no, this is not a thread about poop! haha! you!
I just watched the new Tim Burton rendition of charlie and the chocolate factory, and overall it was...I think "silly" is the best word to describe it. I was definately disappointed by some stuff, for example modern culture leeking into what could be timeless. It was also trying way too hard to be funny in spots.
However there were parts with humor so subtle I was the only one laughing in the theatre, and heartily might I add, those were the good parts. I also noticed my heart being warmed in spots, which was weird.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:21 [#01667076]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I am looking forward to seeing it.
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:22 [#01667077]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular
|
|
why was it necessary to remake what was a classic film? No remakes or sequels are ever going to be as good or better! just look at the films over the Summer :-
Kong (remake) Charlie and the Choc Factory (Remake) War of the World (Remake) Batman Begins (Prequel)
and all are gonna be/have been crap.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:22 [#01667078]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I've never seen the original, so I'll probably watch this with fresh eyes and then see the original later on and get it reversed and.. I wonder what I'll think of the original vs this...
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-07-18 14:23 [#01667079]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
oh noes!..
"silly" is mostly what i was afraid of. :(
|
|
vcxz
from currently N.I. on 2005-07-18 14:23 [#01667080]
Points: 413 Status: Lurker
|
|
I haven't seen that one. I've been meanign to watch it for a long, long time.
I watched Beetlejuice last weekend and liked it. I have liked every Burton's film I've seen so far.
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2005-07-18 14:23 [#01667081]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict
|
|
so is the "we are the music makers and we are the dreamers of the dreams" or whatever in the new flick also?
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:24 [#01667084]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667077 | Show recordbag
|
|
not all remakes and sequels are crap.
I prefer the rammstein version of das model over the original...
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:24 [#01667086]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667077 | Show recordbag
|
|
Actually Charlie and the Chocolate Factory isn't technically a remake at all.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:25 [#01667087]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667077 | Show recordbag
|
|
And Batman Begins is fucking great.
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2005-07-18 14:25 [#01667088]
Points: 12425 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667077
|
|
It's not a remake, shut up.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:29 [#01667091]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
oh, is this a new movie based on the book?
then I'll probably never see the other movie just because it isn't so easily available that I could just rent it...
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:29 [#01667092]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #01667088
|
|
yes it is a remake you ignorant swine
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2005-07-18 14:31 [#01667093]
Points: 12425 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667092
|
|
Alright then.
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:31 [#01667094]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular
|
|
'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' A big studio film that really works. A remake that improves on the original. Hollywood is truly in fantasy land with "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory," Tim Burton's wildly imaginative take on Roald Dahl's beloved children's book. This is the sort of visual feast Burton was born to make. It's a film packed with chaste delights for young children and plenty of sophisticated, cryptic edge to entertain and puzzle their parents.
kitsapsun.com
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:32 [#01667095]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667094 | Show recordbag
|
|
It's not a remake, shut up. xltronic.com
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:33 [#01667096]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01667084
|
|
the video might be better but Rammstein's version of the song is terrible. They ruined Kreaftwerk's cleverly crafted melody with those damn intruding guitars that they always use. On top of that I don't think Till Linderman's voice is anything particularly special.
|
|
ambsace
from canaDUH. on 2005-07-18 14:34 [#01667099]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker
|
|
tim burton wanted to do it 'right' because he hated the gene wilder version. *shrugs*
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:34 [#01667100]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667096 | Show recordbag
|
|
rammsteins version isn't a gay anthem.
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2005-07-18 14:34 [#01667101]
Points: 12425 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667094
|
|
Alright, some review from "kitsapsun.com", thanks for proving me wrong.
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:35 [#01667103]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01667095
|
|
yes it is a god damn remake of the 1971 original starring Gene Wilder.
The Original.
|
|
ToXikFB
on 2005-07-18 14:35 [#01667105]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker
|
|
people say this is childish and ITS A KIDS FILM
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-07-18 14:36 [#01667106]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
The trailers made Wonka look like he spouts out a bunch of one-liner crappies.
Is this true?
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:36 [#01667107]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I don't even know if Tim has re-seen the original picture, he may have seen it when he was a kid, I never went back and looked at it again. Because what we were doing was not a remake of that picture, it was a stand alone of the Roald Dahl book, using what he had written, his title, and no music, in terms of one actor singing to others.
Interview with Richard Zanuck (Producer of the film)
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:37 [#01667108]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667103 | Show recordbag
|
|
you know that two movies can be based on the same book without being remakes of each other right?
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-07-18 14:37 [#01667109]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
This film is not a fucking remake.
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:37 [#01667110]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01667107
|
|
meh, they would say that. We'll have to agree to disagree.
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2005-07-18 14:39 [#01667112]
Points: 12425 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667103
|
|
Oh, look: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367594/movieconnections Version of Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971)
as opposed to, for instance: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335245/movieconnections Remake of The Ladykillers (1955)
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:40 [#01667113]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667110 | Show recordbag
|
|
this is like when gob beldof was trying to get people to buy livesets instead of downloading them because it was "pircay."
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:40 [#01667115]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667110 | Show recordbag
|
|
No we will just all agree you are wrong and you can continue pretending you haven't been proven wrong :P
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:41 [#01667116]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular
|
|
well its pretty damn similar to the original film
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-07-18 14:42 [#01667119]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667116 | Show recordbag
|
|
because they're based on the same book no doubt.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-07-18 14:42 [#01667120]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667116 | Show recordbag
|
|
um, because it's based on the same book.
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-18 14:43 [#01667121]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01667113
|
|
haha ok fair enough my views are obviously the minority, I'll get my coat :)
*flees thread*
|
|
bob
from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2005-07-18 15:00 [#01667171]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667121
|
|
don't come back either!
*shakes fist*
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2005-07-18 15:19 [#01667188]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01667094
|
|
you'rre stupid. since when is everrything that kitsapsun.com says 100% corrrrect?
|
|
scup_bucket
from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-07-18 17:45 [#01667334]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular
|
|
morton: no. epohs: yes.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-07-18 18:16 [#01667359]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to scup_bucket: #01667334
|
|
dang. shit.
|
|
Skink
from A cesspool in eden on 2005-07-18 19:55 [#01667403]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
|
|
What...?
Humpf...
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-07-18 20:07 [#01667405]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
Kay, the film was fun. Don't be such shitheads.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2005-07-19 01:21 [#01667544]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
i liked it. parts i didn't like, but overall i liked it.
|
|
PhystPhukt
from The Holiest of Holes (United States) on 2005-07-19 02:20 [#01667587]
Points: 1414 Status: Addict
|
|
I liked it, alot.
The Oompa Loompa's rocked my hole.
I cant say that for other people, but I myself definetly dug Ol' Tim B's take on the chocolate factory.
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-19 03:23 [#01667639]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to PhystPhukt: #01667587
|
|
*creeps in*
do the oompa lumpas have green peni because the rest of their skin is green. Yum I like small gerkins.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-07-20 08:44 [#01669382]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ok, so the overall reaction is positive then?
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-20 09:14 [#01669429]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular
|
|
I am sure to detest it. I think Orlando Bloom is crap.
Gene Wilder was a legend.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-07-20 09:28 [#01669455]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
orlando bloom is in it?
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-07-20 09:52 [#01669477]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular
|
|
*Johnny Depp
sorry had a brain freeze there
|
|
weatheredstoner
from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-07-20 11:59 [#01669561]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker
|
|
Its mneh.
I saw it and give it a "C-" on a scale from F to A+
BTW: The oompa loompas are mexican
|
|
Messageboard index
|