[Tridenti temporary banned. Who and Why?] | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 433 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index | Topic is closed
[Tridenti temporary banned. Who and Why?]
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-05-30 08:16 [#01616538]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01616537



Why else do you want to know who banned him? You going to
send them flowers?


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-05-30 08:18 [#01616539]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular



*laughs and recalls a long-wilted and forgotten bunch of
Forget-me-nots* :D


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 08:19 [#01616540]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



just for curiosity... i think everybody should take his
responsibilities. mods doing their job, so they don't need
to hide, isn't it?



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-05-30 08:20 [#01616543]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i don't know what good will that do really, but i suppose it
shouldn't be a problem for who ever did it :)


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-05-30 08:21 [#01616544]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01616533 | Show recordbag



Yeah, we all live in the Mod Cave, working shifts.


Attached picture

 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 08:22 [#01616545]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



yeah... so maybe between some minute we will know who was
the "ban-machine"


 

offline nacmat on 2005-05-30 08:23 [#01616548]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I am sure mods do their best... but sometimes is strange
things that happen

I dont know what tridenti do... but he was in the line of
ban lately

but what did ecnadniarb do really???

I ve checked all his posts and all I found was a comment in
which his dislike to jedi was clear... but not really with
disrespect... I dont think people can be banned for having
an opinion that we dont like


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-05-30 08:23 [#01616549]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01616544



*grins and nods* I knew it! I knew it! now if I could only
find this secret lair...


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 08:26 [#01616553]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01616548



yeah, dear nac... i think same of you :-/

i hope this "mod-ban-thing" will not become like a funny
game.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-05-30 08:27 [#01616554]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



i'm not actually here, but i am amazed that this is still
going on.. really, everyone needs to move on; everyone is
caught in a vicious circle of
funny/annoying/hate/spam/ban/bitch about
ban/nomods/mods/toomanybannings/. the politics of this place
is crazy. but like Vpusher pointed out, this is a private
board, so people shouldn't assume that free speach is a
given right.

bye again.

ps DeleriousWeasel you are lamer than a duck with no beak
and one leg, which is covered in ticks. you're a stupid
unfunny fuckwit. bye.


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-05-30 08:30 [#01616560]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular



"ps DeleriousWeasel you are lamer than a duck with no beak
and one leg, which is covered in ticks. you're a stupid
unfunny fuckwit. bye." i_x_ten

was that supposed to be some sort of harsh biting comment?
or a really hilarious attempt to provoke a sense of anger
which you'd like to fester inside of my small furry body?

-it did neither. You Fail, No Sale.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-05-30 08:34 [#01616563]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01616560



don't try and trump me because you didnt think i would post
again. i was just an observation of what i, and i'm sure
many others think of you. it was, quite obviously just my
opinion, asshole.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 08:35 [#01616564]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01616523



its just not fun when things are being deleted banned and
closed without good reasons andwith no explanations besides
the occasional burst of condescending offensive comment


 

offline nacmat on 2005-05-30 08:35 [#01616565]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



its true that nomods cannot be complaing all the time about
every decision taken buy mods... that is true

but sometimes it gets over the coherent line and people have
the place to post about it

I myself receive a lot of criticsm for my decisions at
watmm... and I must respect that... one thing is to be
insulted, but if people is just expressing their opinion a
mod shall be partial enough to not be influenced by his
personal feelings

nomod people shall also know where the lines is, and if so
they cross it, dont come later asking why they were banned

in this occasion I doont think that is lee´s attitude... he
has reasons to be stranged about the bann


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-05-30 08:36 [#01616567]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular



well there's no need to start a flame war out of nothing is
there i_x_ten. Frankly I thought it was simply an unprovoked
attack on my person so I responded calmly, I wasn't trying
to "trump" anyone.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-30 08:37 [#01616568]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01616564



This board is built on condescending offensive comments!

:p

DanBlech: Thanks! :)


 

offline xceque on 2005-05-30 08:39 [#01616570]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



...things are getting out of hand


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-05-30 08:40 [#01616572]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to xceque: #01616570



stop banning people then!


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 08:40 [#01616573]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01616565



also 'cos everybody is ready to criticize my poll everyweek
too and i always accept critics 'cos they help me to improve
my job as poll-makers

i think the ban power is a serious thing inside a serious mb
and so mods should be conscious of this power


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-05-30 08:40 [#01616574]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to xceque: #01616570



I second that -_-


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 08:42 [#01616576]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to xceque: #01616570



agree


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-30 08:44 [#01616577]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to xceque: #01616570



Thing can be restored through your crush photo collection!
Honest!

;)


 

offline xceque on 2005-05-30 08:44 [#01616578]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'm listening to The Garden of Dreams by Pete Namlook
(Silence). I suggest we all do the same. It'll help, honest.


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2005-05-30 08:51 [#01616583]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict



just so you know this wasnt meant as troll
behaviour but more as a statement or whatever, like why
should you ban tridenti and not me,
oh and maybe a bit to show that trying to keep the board
clean by banning and deleting all shit could have the
reversed effect :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-05-30 08:57 [#01616584]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Morton: #01616583



you could have easily put that statement in this
thread..just like you did now :)


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 08:58 [#01616585]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01616568



but its not. xlt was always friendly. now new mods have got
all wierd and cross and poweriffic. it always worked before
when unneeded threads were just closed with a little
explanation. now posts are deleted, threads deleted, people
banned by secret invisible ninja mods with bad tempers, mods
have posted little but mockery and needless threats


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-05-30 09:00 [#01616586]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to Dannn_: #01616564



Dannn is right


 

offline xceque on 2005-05-30 09:02 [#01616587]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Followup to Dannn_: #01616585 | Show recordbag



Well now, that's some post. I remember a time when all you'd
post was insults! Looks like you're settling down at last.
Welcome to the fold young fellow. :) You'll never leave.
You're my wife now...


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2005-05-30 09:03 [#01616588]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01616585



i'm affraid i have to agree with you bear


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-30 09:06 [#01616589]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01616585



I see what you are saying. Although i do think that recently
we have had some newer additions to this board (user wise)
and some things looked a bit clustered. There is a season
for everything and since the new mods came on i personally
feel that there was a need for some brief and swift
moderation.

Its kind of like when you need to throughly clean your room
and you end up moving the bed and dresser around. It looks a
bit chaotic but over all things will end up tidy and better
than before.

I believe the lack of explaination of thread closure and
banning comes from a point where perhaps the mods viewed it
wasnt needed. In this case Tridenti was walking on "thin
ice" and had a number of posters including moderators warn
him and even offer advice when it comes to posting style.

This occured over a peroid of time and throughout various
threads. In the end of that particular situation it would be
obvious to anyone who dwindles their hours away here that it
was coming.

In certain cases i think that various topics should be
closed in certain instances but in the more questionable
threads there should be some final imput by whoever closes
it.

Then again i suppose its not always entirely necessary if
persay that:

Thread title = shit

and then the post is "fuck"

and there is no more content.


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:06 [#01616590]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



I think Phobiazero should write a reply here too


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-05-30 09:09 [#01616591]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



for the record, I dont mind the thread closing and banning
so much as I miss the old dog_belch


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-05-30 09:10 [#01616593]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



(that was not to imply that dog_belch was doing the
closing and banning)


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-30 09:12 [#01616595]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01616589



On the opposite side of this post i do have another
viewpoint and understanding....

Shit threads (weather you agree or not) are mildly
important. They provide an instance where all users can be
vastly off topic and even insult the thread author providing
comedy for all.

Alot of the best threads on this board have absolutely
nothing to do with braindance/idm at all. Its a story about
someones life. Its a garbled post by a drunk man. Its a
blantent insult at another member. In these posts and
threads you will find the very clever and creative xlt
members saying things that often time cause real life
LOL's.

I've sat here a many of time laughing to myself over silly
photos and or comments and running jokes provided by a
thread.

Sure sometimes things seem stale but i rather think of it as
a creative team having writers block. This board is chalk
full of the best people. Thats what keeps me coming back!

:)


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:13 [#01616596]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



the scary thing is that after 2 hours we don't know who
banned tridenti yet...


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-05-30 09:15 [#01616597]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to WooferAttack: #01616596



thats not what this thread is about


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-30 09:15 [#01616598]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01616590



No offense but what are we getting to here? Could you have
just not emailed this to all mods/admin? That could have
saved time and been more private.

I dont think the moderator should or feel as though they
need to fess up. This decision was decided by a (or more
than one) moderator and was supported by a number of members
throughout various threads.

Its only a temp anyways. Tridenti means well and seems like
an honestly nice person. He just needs to settle down a
little bit. Perhaps you could adivse him since you are the
arbitraitor in this situation seemingly.


 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 09:20 [#01616600]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker



what a load of fucking bollocks, all of it. These new mods
seem to have gone crazy with their newly granted powers. I
don't come here often but thats just how it appears to me.


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:22 [#01616601]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01616598



ok, do everything you want anyway i always remain perplexed.
anyway now i know who banned tridenti.



 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 09:24 [#01616602]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01616601



oh? Who was it?


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:24 [#01616603]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



more than one


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:25 [#01616604]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



it's a conspiracy against poor undefended Tridenti...



 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 09:25 [#01616605]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01616603



Dog Belch??


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-05-30 09:25 [#01616606]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



haha who told you that lie? :)


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:27 [#01616608]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



the strongs who subjugate the weaks...


 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 09:28 [#01616609]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01616606



If you are asking me, I was just generalising based on the
evidence provided here?

Woofer: It seems from what I have read on this matter, that
its a classic case of "If you spam you get a ban!" Clean cut
to me :S


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2005-05-30 09:29 [#01616610]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker



[lucidity]this is some shit huh?.. who except woofer who
obviously is related to this fellow italian spamming mate
cares about tridenti? he's been here a few months spamming
every day, making as many posts as i have created in the
past, what, like.. 3 years. thats insane, good call to give
tridenti a breather.

really, no one gets banned for no reason, theres always
something and everybody knows that. [end of lucidity]


Attached picture

 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 09:29 [#01616611]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01616606



Unless of course it was you?!??!


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-05-30 09:30 [#01616612]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



jedy chris, dear friend, are you able to ban poor tridenti
alone?!? i can't believe it...

jedy is a fair mod, i think this is a conspiracy...



 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-05-30 09:30 [#01616613]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker | Followup to cuntychuck: #01616610



"no one gets banned for no reason, theres always
something and everybody knows that"

Well said


 


Messageboard index