Good and evil ? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 637 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Good and evil ?
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:26 [#01597097]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Do you believe in Good and Evil ? Can you REALLY
distinguish between Good and Evil, or does it ALWAYS depend
on the person ?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:27 [#01597098]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



i dont believe in Good and Evil, i believe in good and evil.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:28 [#01597099]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



an


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:28 [#01597100]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



There are no absolutes........relativism rules......
therefore no good, no evil.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:29 [#01597101]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597100



So, you wouldn't call Hitler an Evil person ? Maybe
misguided, or delusional, but NOT evil?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:30 [#01597102]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



there are evil people, there are good people, but you should
probably find that out yourself and not take my word for it.



 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:31 [#01597103]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597101



do you know hitler? enough to say that yes, he was evil -
you should researve these words for people you know.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:32 [#01597104]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



Thats right.... not Evil...... not misguided either,
probably delusional, definitely damaging, destructive,
deadly (all the d's!)........ Evil is a human construct


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:34 [#01597105]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597104



what do you mean human construct? we are humans we live in
our constructs - what else is there?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:34 [#01597106]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597103



He was a democraticlly elected leader.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:35 [#01597109]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597106



? why is this important?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:35 [#01597111]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597104



Metaphysic, god, Religion, etc


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:37 [#01597113]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597109



Im not trying to defend Hitler, Im trying to find a
defenition for GOOD and EVIL


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:39 [#01597114]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597113



ok....i will give you my definition of evil - a person is
evil or shows evilness when they willfully choose to do the
morally incorrect thing - morality has to be put into the
definition of evil because, it defines a standard or ethics.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:40 [#01597115]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



The ideas of "Evil" and "Good" don't exist outside of the
human experience....... whereas and idea or "thing" like
"destruction" does, if you follow me...........


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:42 [#01597116]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



how can you define a standard of morality? what you may
think is immoral, i may think as being ok.........


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:42 [#01597117]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597113



good would be....to willfully choose to make moral
decisions. if you go through life, and in the back of your
mind you are always looking to the moral side as the correct
side, and you feel it as the correct side, you are good.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:44 [#01597118]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597115



no i dont follow you - nothing exists outside of human
experience - obviously there is matter and all of that, time
and space and that - but everything is only given meaning by
us therefore without us, or humans, nothing has meaning.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:44 [#01597119]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597114



Every society has its on morality standards, that you could
always criticize....


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:46 [#01597120]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597116



but there is a standard or morality whether or not opinions
differ - there is a goodness and a badness sense about
actions - whether or not you view killing a person as the
morally correct view - you are good in your eyes but evil in
my eyes, the definitions still exist, but are different for
you and me - i am not saying they are absolute.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:46 [#01597121]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597118



Really? You think things only have meaning because of
humans? What would happen if we were all wiped out? Would
the universe end? what happenned before we had evolved?
Nothing existed? What is this "meaning" you talk about?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:46 [#01597122]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597119



they are not absolute though - like i said Good vs good,
Evil vs evil


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:48 [#01597123]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597120



I guess I just disagree with you... I don't think there are
goodness or badness feel to things that is
universal.........


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:49 [#01597125]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597120



So therefore is it OKAY, to kill EVIL people ?


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:50 [#01597126]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597123



Hang on, the reads like shit.........

I guess I disagree with you....... I don't believe that
things have a universal good or bad sense to them.....


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:50 [#01597127]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597121



yes the universe, as far as we are concerned would end, how
do you know it wouldnt end? you could never know this - the
meaning of an ending is again, our definition of an ending,
how do we know, in absolute terms, what would happen without
us around? if the human experience would end - the
definitions we place on our surroundings would end with us -
these things might go on without us, but what meaning have
they? nothing defines them - they are outside the boundaries
of our experience.


 

offline imdex from Argentina on 2005-05-12 23:52 [#01597129]
Points: 1689 Status: Regular



50% and 50%


 

offline imdex from Argentina on 2005-05-12 23:53 [#01597130]
Points: 1689 Status: Regular



= vida


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:54 [#01597131]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597125



if you view that as a good or morally correct thing, and you
want to always choose the morally correct thing - it is a
morally correct decision for you to make - but as you decide
to carry out your "good" decision -will every person see it
as you do? no - hence good and evil are not absolute, but
dependent upon the standard.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:55 [#01597132]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597127



...these things might go on without us, but what meaning
have they


To evolve without us ? The fact that the dinosaurs died out
is one great evidence that evolutionary theory is correct...


 

offline imdex from Argentina on 2005-05-12 23:56 [#01597134]
Points: 1689 Status: Regular



upon the standard - vida = Tridenti


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-12 23:56 [#01597135]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597127



You assume that experience ends when you die.......... you
can never know that this is the case ;)

The universe would not end if humans were wiped out
dude....sorry, just wouldn't happen.......


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-12 23:57 [#01597136]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597131



If they are dependent on someones standard, therefore GOOD
and EVIL do not exist. Just as Black and white are not
colors


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-12 23:58 [#01597137]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597132



but the dinosaurs only came into our existence when we found
their fossils - yes they were on this planet millions of
years ago - but did it have any meaning to us before we
found there fossils -no - for all we knew they did not exist
- and infact they did not exist.

evolution is another thread dude :)


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-13 00:01 [#01597138]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597137



they did exist....we just didn't know about them! we are not
the center of the ubiverse.... we are not the reason the
universe is here....


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:02 [#01597139]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597135



you are thinking of ending in a big bangish destruction
thing - i am thinking of it in a nothingness sense - when we
die, nothing will have meaning - therefore it will cease to
exist - now take the sun for example: its due to last
millions or years, and will outlast us - but what will
happens when that day comes - the human race will end - and
so will the sun. now it wont burn out the day we die, but
what meaning has the sun when the organism that give it
meaning cease to exist - nothing, it will be nothing - it
will cease to exist.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-13 00:03 [#01597140]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



ubiverse...... you heard here first


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:06 [#01597141]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597138



you can imagine the dinosaurs millions of years ago - before
us, or you can imagine the sun still being around when we
die out - but it is impossible for it to exist when all of
us die out - just like the dinosaurs did not have meaning
when they existed, and only came into existence when we
found them.

its not that we are the center of the universe, only the
universe and our surroundings are defined through us - they
do not exist outside of our definitions.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-13 00:06 [#01597143]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597139



no, it wont exist....... neither will humans at that
point.... but the universe will exist... thngs that we are
aware of now will exist........like black holes etc.......

i know what you are saying -"with our minds the world we
create"

i just think you are taking the argument into places it
dosn't hold true


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:09 [#01597144]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597143



well i am trying to show that meaning only comes through our
language - the actualness of the universe even- take a rock
- it has the name rock from us, it has its properties from
us - everything about the rock is defines by humans. take
the human out of the rock, and what are you left with? i am
saying you are not left with anything.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-13 00:10 [#01597145]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597141



The universe (or ubiverse) exists independant to human
experience.......... thats the whole of my case.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:11 [#01597146]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597145



how so then? give me your case, what properties of the
universe will exist without human definitions?


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-13 00:11 [#01597147]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



I'm about to finish up at work, so lets agree to disagree!
have a good weekend!


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-05-13 00:12 [#01597148]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



I'll get back to you when i log on at home


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:13 [#01597149]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #01597148



good discussion, take care


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-13 00:15 [#01597150]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597144



The RAW Substance, you are left with. Every object has an
internal and external reality


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:27 [#01597155]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597150



mr monoid - both of those are defined by human intellect -
like i am saying - the actual-ness or raw substance of a
rock - or even math or physics does not matter after the
beings who define it leave existence

the raw substance is still defined by us - now will that
rock exist? you could even lay the out the chemical
compounds that make it us - what is it after we die or cease
to exist?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:27 [#01597156]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597155



us = up


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2005-05-13 00:28 [#01597157]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01597155



Solipsism?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-05-13 00:33 [#01597159]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01597157



not truly - maybe more like the human mind (a theoreitcal
whole) is the only thing that exists - it is the only thing
that gives meaning.


 


Messageboard index