 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 347 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614128 Today 0 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
explain, and show work in the side columns for full credit |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
reason 3.0 or cubase sx that is |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
both! run reason + via rewire + cubase = track |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
cubase sx because it doesn't have limitations to only few synths and effects, like reason. you can record wavs with cubase, something that isn't possible in reason. cubase sx sequencer is better, more advanced. though i don't know how much propellerheads improved theirs for reason 3. and what's most important: reason doesn't support vsts which is a major - |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its either one or the other. i can only afford to buy one program at this time. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
get FL studio instead. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i have an older version of fruity loops...3 maybe. i haven't found many vst's though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Cubase SX |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Use Rhino. He supports ReWire |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
do you have any hardware that you want to use? do you want to record audio live (rather than sampling)? if so, cubase. otherwise, i'd go with reason. but then again, it sort of depends on what you want to use the software for as well. what do you want to use the software for? what kind of music are you wanting to make? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
for hardware i have: a m-audio 61 key station eventually an alesis drum machine. (which i intend to use to tap beats into a sequencer...and experiment with when not using my computer. i'd like to make drum and bass venetian snares style. or ambient stuff |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
for recording i have Adobe Audition |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Reason for everything. and its cheaper. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes if you're only going to legitimatley purchase things then buy Reason as you'll get more bang for your buck. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well its 500 bucks or 450. i was just wondering since cubase was a hundred more if i should just go...for broke. and use that. but i checked out the reason demo and it seems cool |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'd say cubase sx but i am biased. perhaps cubase se because its cheaper and then you have money to buy something else, piece of hardware, softsynths, a shiny new bike, etc |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Go for cubase. If you want to run your synths through your computer, you can do that with Cubase. WIth reason, you will have to buy a separate program to run your synths and record them. Reason doesn't have a midi controller. Also, the synths are pretty limited, and it doesn't sound professional at all. Cubase allows you to control and record and add effects to any synthesizers samplers or drum machines that you have. Personally, I don't see how their can be any debate. Although Reason is more user friendly, and won't really take you any time at all to learn. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
How in the hell do you get more bang for your buck with reason? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I would take ableton over reason. The included insts and effects are great. Plus clip editing is fucking fun fun fun. Im ditching my apps, getting a little powerbook 12 and ableton. And thats gonna be it for me (except for free vsts. i love those) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yeah. Now that I think about it, I would probly suggest ableton over cubase and reason too. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
FL |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i've never used it. i have it downloaded and installed but i've never bothered. whats the learning curve on it like? how adaptable is it etc? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
because i said so |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i use both... you use cubase as you master system and use rewire to slave reason... reason alone can be limiting but you can't live with out it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
shmoobass |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Actually, if you are using audition, you can probly use the rewire capacities of it to run reason, so you get your recording and such down. I don't know about using it to run a drum machine though. I guess thats what global is for. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i use cubase sx because i am used to it & know what to do to do what i want to do! a lot of people are digging ableton live though reason - does it have such a good mixdown quality? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
No. Its pretty shit with rendering. Thats why you need something like Cubase or Vstack to render it with. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
