[Film] The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 360 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[Film] The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.
 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-04-29 21:34 [#01580911]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I went to see this at the cinema tonight. Considering my
severe doubts about it, i really did enjoy it. Of course
some things about it could be better but overall i don't
think it was going to really please
everyone. I felt that some of the really important dialogue
was cut short but they kind of really crammedas much as they
could into it.

So if any of you have seen it, what do you reckon??


 

offline optimus prime on 2005-04-29 22:15 [#01580941]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker



it was better than i thought it would be. i wouldn't
outright recommend it, but if some friends ask you to see it
then there's no real reason to refuse.

i haven't read the books.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-04-29 22:29 [#01580951]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



the preview looked lame. but i haven't even read the book..
so i have no idea.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-29 22:35 [#01580954]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01580951



the preview looked lame. and I have read the books.


 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2005-04-29 23:21 [#01580971]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the book was great, i cannot wait to see how they transfered
it to film...i have my doubts, but i wanna give it a try.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-04-29 23:34 [#01580975]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01580954



did you like the bookS?


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-04-30 00:46 [#01580987]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



yeas book great, i dunno about the film, plan on seeing it
though


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-04-30 02:08 [#01580993]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I really liked the books, and I thought they did a good job
at transfering them to film. Not a must see, but a good film
nontheless.



 

offline blrr from the block on 2005-04-30 02:52 [#01580995]
Points: 585 Status: Lurker



i think it is a truly abominable piece of filmmaking.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-04-30 02:55 [#01580996]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to blrr: #01580995



I used to judge shit like that and then I realized that you
can appreciate things and have fun at the same time.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-04-30 02:57 [#01580997]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to blrr: #01580995



PS; To the hater in the house, if your going to go around
fronting, it might be best to watch your back.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-30 06:30 [#01581055]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Taxidermist: #01580996



oh god.. you grew up.... eeewwww...!


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2005-04-30 06:45 [#01581066]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular



the preview looked alright. and i have listened to the
original radio show, read the books, and seen the series.


 

offline FlyAgaric from the discovery (Africa) on 2005-04-30 06:59 [#01581075]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular



it looks interesting. i started reading the book on my computer but
i hate reading for long periods on the screen. should
probably get it in paper form sometime for some laid back
reading.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-04-30 07:12 [#01581078]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01581055



I thought the previews looked lame as well. I was pleasantly
surprised. I saw a trailer for the war of the worlds, that
looks really fucking lame.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2005-04-30 09:17 [#01581116]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



excellent film, but needs seeing twice. It's pretty surreal
and a lot of the insanity would go over most people's heads
though. Marvin the android was excellent, Zaphod was a
dereanged combo of George Bush and Laurence Llewellyn Bowen
and the Vogon's are fucking hideous alien politician type
things. It's pretty hard edged for a hollywood film as
well.. you don't often see naff looking clay animation in a
big budget film. Lots of British sensibilites in it as
well.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-04-30 09:39 [#01581134]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



It was entertaining enough, some silly mistakes and some
shoddy directing made it probably pretty confusing for
people who don't know the books. Loads of things go
completely unexplained for no reason so the whole story is
kind of fumbling in the dark a bit too much. For example
loads of towel gags but with no background. Too much of the
crappy romance too. I couldn't help thinking of some classic
lines that they seemed to line themselves up for and then
never use, especially with the tea being "almost, but not
quite, entirely unlike tea". I liked it but a lot of scenes
just didn't have the best jokes in.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-04-30 09:54 [#01581153]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01581134



I agree.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2005-04-30 21:02 [#01581703]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01581134



I think you cut through the shit and hit the nail straight
on the head


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-04-30 21:16 [#01581728]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Dannn_: #01581134



i read the books in highschool over 10 years ago. not
recently enough to really remember much about it. the
preview looked like they were marketing it like a sci fi
action adventure movie when i remember the books being more
of a smart assed cynical rip on mankind. so it translated
to screen ok then? hmmm..!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-04-30 21:18 [#01581733]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



It was complete crap, even crappier than the books. They
took every powerfu,l high spot in the movie and made it a
subtle, bland low and vice versa. I can list 10 essential
things off the top of my head that they completely ommited.
By the way I havn't read the books or seen the movie :/


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-04-30 21:21 [#01581739]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01581728



Most people don't seem to realise that the screenplay was
done by Douglas Adams himself and someone whose name escapes
me at this time.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-04-30 21:24 [#01581746]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Skink: #01581739



hmm wow. maybe i'll go see it then!


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-04-30 21:27 [#01581752]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



hmm yes the other screenwriter was Karey Kirkpatrick who
doesn't necessarily have that great of a resume actually...
(charlotte's web, chicken run..? james and the giant
peach..? honey we shrunk ourselves..?)!


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-04-30 21:28 [#01581754]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



LAZY_karey kirkpatrick


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-04-30 22:26 [#01581806]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01581754



Oh...

I still think you should reserve judgement.


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2005-05-01 00:55 [#01581842]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker



should've made it into more. i expect sequels



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2005-05-01 00:58 [#01581843]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



fuckin sucked IMO


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-05-01 02:34 [#01581870]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



How do you put all the ideas from the book into that
movie??? it felt long enough as it was, and a lot of stuff
was left out. They pretty much ran alongside the book for
the most part, and it was supposed to be a goofy satire on
the human condition.

It was supposed to be tastless and over the top and dry.

Enough discussion. If you don't like it, you can go suck a
fuck.


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-01 03:51 [#01581894]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01581733



i'm surprised that nobody has mentioned the radio series, as
that is what HGTG was originally, not a book.
it should be quite easy to download.


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2005-05-03 21:42 [#01585641]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular



i started listening to the radio series when i was 10 or so.
i'm looking forward to seeing it. my brother just came back
from seeing it tonight and he thought it was really good. he
too has been listening & reading for as long as i have.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-05-03 22:34 [#01585651]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to forck_02lynix: #01585641



i heard about this radio series. makes me think of ralphie
and randy listening to little orphan annie in 'christmas
story'

"remember - to - eat - your - ovaltine. Ovaltine? Son of a
bitch!"


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2005-05-04 00:42 [#01585687]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



that marvin looked so weird. so ........ apple-like. but i
expect this will be ok.

so i'll see it next year when it comes to cinemas here :(


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-05-04 10:29 [#01586076]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to neetta: #01585687



22nd of july for the Finsters.

Dutchies have to wait til the 4th of august.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2005-05-04 10:42 [#01586094]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01586076



so when i come to netherlands i can hark at you because i
already saw it.

(i just love that word. hark)


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-05-04 12:43 [#01586246]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to neetta: #01586094



hark..?

are you threatening to listen to me?


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2005-05-04 15:14 [#01586440]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



there is an another meaning for the word too. returning to a
previously discussed thing. i haven't written english in a
while so the whole sentence was grammatically wrong. how
silly of me :(


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2005-05-04 21:04 [#01587134]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular



"hark! hark!" harkened he!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-05-04 21:07 [#01587136]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to neetta: #01586440



I have no idea which meaning you could be referring to.

dictionary.com only gives this:

hark ( P )
intr.v. harked, hark·ing, harks

To listen attentively.

Idiom:
hark back
To return to a previous point, as in a narrative.




 

offline xf from Australia on 2005-05-04 21:26 [#01587154]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker



i saw it with Refund and some other dude last weekend; quite
liked it, actually. i had low expectations (due to adams
not actually sticking around for the whole thing), and it
definitely exceeded those. certainly lots of elements that
could have been done better, but it was still very well
done.

here's to them making the "trilogy"!


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2005-05-04 23:07 [#01587194]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



Caught the movie a few days ago......it was an absolute
mess!
I've never read the books so i cant claim any real insight,
but the film on its own was terrible.



 


Messageboard index