|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:13 [#01556314]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
and got developed this afternoon: kitty please see the larger version by clicking on the image too. i think its amazing. i scanned the nagative with this film scanner i got. i used to scan prints. prints are terrible compared with negative scans.
seriously i am so surprised at the difference. it blows me away.
photos that look terrible s priints are beautiful. its because they muck about with the levels
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2005-04-07 21:17 [#01556316]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
nice pussy. it looks very high-quality to me.
yikes! i just clicked full-size. yes, high-quality photo.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:19 [#01556318]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
thats even only 50% of the original scan.
|
|
mimi
on 2005-04-07 21:23 [#01556320]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
What kind of negative scanner do you have? I am thinking about getting one.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:36 [#01556328]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
its a canon fs4000us i recomend it very much. here are some reviews (also here) i just got it last week or so. it is slower then most of the newer ones (20mins for a strip of 4 exposures at full bit depth and resolution and dust removal). the dust/scratch removal is excellent, and as you can see from the samples in the reviews. it doesnt lower the quality at all, i think because it actually detects the dust using some infra red method. all my negatives are in great shape, and i just have been using a can of compressed air to get rid of the odd piece of dust before scanning.
its only usb1.0 or scsi. no firewire/usb2.0 . im just using usb.
the 42-bit color depth (14 per channel) really does make a difference if you are going to adjust the levels at all. i dont like the idea of adjusting much, but i figure im going through all my years of negatives i should collect as much data as possible. the files are 140mb photoshop files or around 110mb png files. both those formats retain all the data.
i love it. i am pissed off at prints. one thing is that poorly taken/tricky photos are often heavily adjusted for the prints. so the unmodified neg scan might look worse then the prettied up print. but a good picture is amazingly more better from the negative scan.
href="http://alibosworth.com/transfer/_print_neg_comparison this is a good example: comparison
theyve adjusted the print to more of a sky blue, but you can see theyve changed it a lot. heres another
you can see how much they crop out for the prints too!!
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:43 [#01556331]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
i got on this whole trip when i had a big 20 inch print made up for someone for a show in tokyo or something.
the print is amazing. and although the original print was very nice, it was 100 times better in the big print. this was partly because of the clarity but also the cropping.
so i decided that all my prints that i had scanned in the past sucked. and then i looked into the negative scanners.
um i hope that the information is somewhat useful i think this is the best scanner out there (if your okay with a little slowness) unless you want to spend much more money.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:44 [#01556332]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
sorry for that broken link in my post up there i should have previewed.
|
|
mimi
on 2005-04-07 21:48 [#01556336]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
it looks nice but i realized that i want one for the sake of having one. i just bought a dslr camera and i don't have that much film that i'd scan anyways so i think i'll hold off for the time being at least. thanks for the info.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:50 [#01556339]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah. which dslr did you get?
|
|
mimi
on 2005-04-07 21:51 [#01556341]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
damn, now i have to tell everyone that i got the cheap-o cannon rebel
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 21:52 [#01556343]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
hey apparently the hardware is the same as the higher end models. its only limited in the firmware for most of the features.
theres a hack to make it mostly the same as the other EOSs or whatever they are.
|
|
mimi
on 2005-04-07 21:54 [#01556344]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
i am so non-techie that i hardly know what you're talking about. but i love my camera, it is really a nice one. plus the weather is starting to get warm enough for me to be outside for more than 5 minutes at a time so this summer should be a fun one for photos.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-04-07 22:56 [#01556419]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
phob has incoming
phob, you have 6days
pray for customs good luck
pray
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-07 23:04 [#01556431]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
phob has incoming
phob, you have 6days
pray for customs good luck
pray
??
|
|
optimus prime
on 2005-04-07 23:27 [#01556457]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
|
|
looks like a typical portrait taken with a good camera.
|
|
optimus prime
on 2005-04-07 23:28 [#01556458]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
|
|
i'm double posting for the extra points and to say that i'll have some photos of my cat by next friday.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-08 00:01 [#01556465]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
theres lots of other photos of kitty on my site if you havnt seen.
looks like a typical portrait nah niggus, its not typical, its kittenfull.
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2005-04-08 06:19 [#01556612]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to denniscpearce: #01556465
|
|
nice pics ! thanks for the info, i've added a scanner to my wishlist. i've got lots of old negatives waiting to be recovered and scanned
|
|
Opto
on 2005-04-08 06:21 [#01556615]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict
|
|
full size seems to be blurred to me.
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2005-04-08 06:43 [#01556643]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to Opto: #01556615
|
|
are You a photographer ?
|
|
Opto
on 2005-04-08 06:47 [#01556646]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict | Followup to obara: #01556643
|
|
cant tell you
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2005-04-08 07:06 [#01556675]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to Opto: #01556646
|
|
why not ?
|
|
big
from lsg on 2005-04-08 07:08 [#01556676]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
he looks smart
|
|
Opto
on 2005-04-08 07:09 [#01556677]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict | Followup to obara: #01556675
|
|
coz its a secret
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-04-08 07:10 [#01556679]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
:kittah:
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-08 10:47 [#01556889]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
full size seems to be blurred to me. what are you talking about. its called depth of field. look at his eyes, well, his left one.
|
|
pOgO
from behind your belly button fluff on 2005-04-08 10:51 [#01556891]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker
|
|
what a cute oussy you have!
Here's mine
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-04-08 10:54 [#01556895]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
best cat evar:
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
godataloss
from Cleveland (United States) on 2005-04-08 12:11 [#01557015]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker
|
|
I dont get it. What's supposed to be great here? The cat? The photo? The fact that it's a scanned negative? The fact that you are secure enough as a person to post such a huge file of a cat laying on a couch?
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-08 12:13 [#01557018]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular | Followup to godataloss: #01557015
|
|
i wish this thread was never born.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2005-04-08 12:14 [#01557019]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to godataloss: #01557015
|
|
well.. here's a graph of the coolness factor of this thread.
you can clearly see the point at which fuzzface made his appearance.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-04-08 12:15 [#01557020]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
not my kittah but my friends
bah, not enuff light for large DoF but it's a kittah = <3 kittahs = :kittah: = cute
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2005-04-08 12:17 [#01557022]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01557020
|
|
yeah, fuck, thats a nice kitty. oh god cats are awsome.
|
|
Messageboard index
|