|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 08:03 [#01523212]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
AFX - Analord 05 [ANALORD005] 12 inch $9.00 (RELEASE DATE: 03-15-05) ============================== AFX - Analord 06 [ANALORD006] 12 inch $9.00 (RELEASE DATE: 04-05-05) ============================== AFX - Analord 07 [ANALORD007] 12 inch $9.00 (RELEASE DATE: 05-17-05) ============================== AFX - Analord 08 [ANALORD008] 12 inch $9.00 (RELEASE DATE: 05-17-05) ============================== AFX - Analord 09 [ANALORD009] 12 inch $9.00 (RELEASE DATE: 05-17-05) ============================== (Aphex Twin - Analord 10) Not listed... no info... ============================== AFX - Analord 11 [ANALORD011] 12 inch $9.00 (RELEASE DATE: 05-17-05) A1. 'W32.Mydoom.AU@mm' B1. 'VBS.Redlof.B' B2. 'Backdoor.Ranky.S'. ==============================
Sweet. i can't wait to hear 5,6...and the rest obviously. now you may go forth and complain about another analord thread...
|
|
pf
from Finland on 2005-03-06 08:06 [#01523213]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker | Followup to thecrimsonguard: #01523212
|
|
fuck, another analord thread.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2005-03-06 08:06 [#01523214]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
i wish there were more xmd5a's in the series.
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 08:10 [#01523221]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
still no listing for analord 7, maybe this is the disc with the collaborations and whatnot...who knows maybe grant was just fucking with us. hopefully its something cool...maybe more xmd5a's for you tolstoyed.
ps love the extra virus track names.
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2005-03-06 08:13 [#01523224]
Points: 7541 Status: Lurker
|
|
analord 7,8,9,11 the same day !!
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2005-03-06 08:38 [#01523231]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
according to rephlex page, 7 and 8 are supposed to be released on april, and 6 on march...
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 08:49 [#01523237]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
yea maybe a typo on ear rationals part...
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 09:37 [#01523303]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
but i wouldn't be oppossed to a huge release of music...bring on analord 12-50 :)
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 10:13 [#01523368]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
wtf... ?
LAZY_TITLE
rdj has /actually/ called songs after viruses?
that is so immensly fucking retarded. is he taking the piss out of us or what - he can't even come up with randomised track names anymore or something?
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 10:14 [#01523370]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
on second considersation, rdj always /has/ enjoyed taking the piss, so it's in context, i guess. it just seems so fucking lame, though.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 10:20 [#01523382]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
given, it's 3:45 AM in the morning so my tiredness might be making my judgement go right out the window - anybody else find this stupid, though, or am i alone in thinking this?
the more i look at the tracknames for analord, the more i'm convinced this is all a big fucking joke or something. the songs *are* good, though.
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2005-03-06 10:27 [#01523389]
Points: 7541 Status: Lurker | Followup to xf: #01523368
|
|
it's a trick, so we will think twice before downloading his tracks in case they are viruses !!!!
fight against P2P goes on !
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2005-03-06 10:30 [#01523392]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to melack: #01523231
|
|
6 isn't out until april
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-06 10:33 [#01523394]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
Hmm.. id there an echo? the first post looks awful familiar..
track names - dunt matter. the reason i think is an attempt to stop people downloading the tracks. maybe. or maybe he just thought they're good names. or maybe he thinks they suck too, but he couldn't think of anyhthing else better. like 'where's your girlfriend?', that's better. So is 'pissed up in SE1'. I like that for sentimental reasons.
Where's 7? They did say there would be 10, so maybe there's no 7 at all.
i have a feeling 5 will rule. because it has 2 tracks. fucked up nonlogic, maybe. call it a hunch.
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-03-06 10:41 [#01523405]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
Will a program like spybot or adaware delete the mp3's if they have these file names?
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 10:51 [#01523412]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
nah, they don't match on the filenames; moreso the file content.
in reality the "names" of viruses mean fuck all, anyway; they're just descriptions made up by companies that write antivirus software, usually referring to a previous virus it was based off, a string/word used in the virus, etc. the letters/numbers after it tend to refer to the 'generation', and what platform it runs on (win32, et al).
that's why most antivirus programs will pick up the same virus as different names. most viruses don't really have names.
i don't know, if he called the tracks something like /the/ various identifier strings used in viruses (which would be cooler), i'd give him props, but to call tracks like this is just terribly un-hip.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 11:00 [#01523416]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to xf: #01523412
|
|
to summarise that and to answer previous questions: no, i don't think he's done it so people could download viruses instead.
people who make viruses don't call their fucking viruses MM.Melissa.R@Win32.K or whatever the virus companies want to call them. fuck knows what they call them, but all their virus might do is make "HA HA MELISSA LUVS YOU" show all over the screen, and then the various places that find and write antivirus software go and make suitable names for them.
it appears rdj's referenced symantec's naming - man, he couldn't even choose a decent AV program (norton antivirus).
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-06 11:05 [#01523418]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
.
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-06 11:07 [#01523419]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
so yeah, 5. that will be the bestest. and the most
unhip
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 11:09 [#01523421]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's un-hip
notice the italics, dammit! it makes all the difference.
ignoring the track names, indeed, looking forward to this. the releases so far have been nice; i rather like analord 4.
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2005-03-06 11:09 [#01523422]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to xf: #01523416
|
|
but he has chosen the most popular
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-03-06 11:24 [#01523448]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
stop over analyzing the track names. Let the music speak to you instead.
who really cares why he named them, or what or how. Only he will know and it shouldnt really affect our opinions on his music.
rock on richard
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-06 11:28 [#01523454]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
track names don't change the music, no, but they're an important part of the final presentation; aliken them to cover art on cd's, for example. at the end of the day they don't really fucking matter, but they still are a somewhat important aspect of the whole 'package'.
i'll still listen/buy (if they release them on CD, hint hint) them in any case, but jesus i couldn't have thought of worse tracknames to choose, really.
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-06 11:53 [#01523486]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
i bet you could've if you tried
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2005-03-06 12:21 [#01523523]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
alas, only one aphex twin.
*GRRRRRRR*
this better not be his last releases ever!!!!
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 12:52 [#01523558]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
doubtful...if rephlex keeps releasing silly dub 2-step whatever you call it they might need him to make something new so fans will put money back into the label...they need us as much as we need them. and seeing how RDJ is no longer part of warp....or at least messageboard rumor has it...they'll need every fan of theirs to keep them going.
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2005-03-06 12:53 [#01523561]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01523523
|
|
Its definately not one of his first releases evah
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2005-03-06 12:55 [#01523562]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to thecrimsonguard: #01523558 | Show recordbag
|
|
I like that view point
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 13:09 [#01523578]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
well, they don't owe us a damn thing...and vice versa. but when you produce a different type of music that has a relatively small fanbase, why alienate them?
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-06 13:26 [#01523595]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
i respectdat.
eh?
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-03-06 13:50 [#01523613]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict
|
|
i found the virus tracknames quite amusing.
i find xf's posts retarded and rather UN-HIP. notice the CAPS. makes SUCH a difference.
that is all.
|
|
-crazone
from smashing acid over and over on 2005-03-06 13:54 [#01523617]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
wtf..there are going to be more then 10 analords?..stop this please..
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-06 14:07 [#01523629]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ok, i stopped it. now what? hold on! There's no 7! 11.. minus 7.. =.. 10!! No!!! 4!!!!! There are only 4 analords! I made the rest on my ibook with garageband. Fooled you fuckers. Haha. Wanna buy a binder? I need more tank fuel..
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2005-03-06 14:08 [#01523630]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01523405
|
|
hahaha first funny post in this thread
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2005-03-06 14:15 [#01523637]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
hahahaha theres is 7. thereare 11 btw.
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-06 14:36 [#01523660]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
has phobiazero talked to anybody from rephlex lately? maybe he knows somethin bout 7
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2005-03-08 11:07 [#01525693]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular
|
|
where did this info cfome from? because i think they got their info from here. rather sneakily i said analord 6 was due on the 4th april which it ISN'T. it's gonna be 11th at the earliest.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2005-03-08 11:17 [#01525698]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker
|
|
will the analord madness EVER end ?
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2005-03-09 10:29 [#01527021]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
this info came from ear ratoinal. i really hope that these tracks are those 'acid white labels' we've heard before on cylobs live set. but something deep down says no :( and that makes me sad.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2005-03-09 10:59 [#01527100]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker | Followup to thecrimsonguard: #01527021
|
|
ear-rational has worked for me !
|
|
adam
from londonidium (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-09 11:05 [#01527120]
Points: 209 Status: Lurker
|
|
To answer earthleakage, this was originally posted on the IDM list, apparently from some distributor or other. I'll check.. ah, here -
"From: StaticBeats Date: Sat Mar 5, 2005 8:17:44 pm Europe/London To: Intolerable Daily Madness Subject: [idm] Analord release schedule
Just got this from PBE. *Ahem* notice Analord 11 in there. "
then the text in the first post
"Shimone/Justes http://www.staticbeats.com Electronic Music > Digital Culture" So, from PBE then
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2005-03-09 11:37 [#01527191]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker
|
|
its really a good piracy preventer, i think its genious!
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-09 13:58 [#01527349]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01523613
|
|
you're RETARDED too, my friend. love all around.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-03-09 14:00 [#01527351]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
additionally, if it wasn't already glaringly obvious, half my statements aren't intended to be taken as seriously as they're perhaps being taken.
i sure as hell still think the names of the tracks are stupid, but i bet the music is still great so it doesn't matter. other comments aren't really relevant.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-03-09 14:17 [#01527364]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
XFree86Setup
|
|
magness
from astroblaster (Antarctica) on 2005-03-09 14:42 [#01527392]
Points: 589 Status: Lurker
|
|
I wouldn't be at all surprised if the records are released with completely different track names than the ones listed... other artists have done this (TOOL comes to mind) to mess with the P2P community
|
|
Messageboard index
|