|
|
oyvinto
on 2005-02-03 12:12 [#01486402]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i just discovered the huge advantage of using the 'newest message first' option in threads. i should have thought of that when i refreshed the 'ae @ xlt radio' thread for seven hours.
how about you? newest or oldest first?
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2005-02-03 12:14 [#01486406]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
oldest first
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2005-02-03 12:15 [#01486407]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular
|
|
age before beauty
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-02-03 12:19 [#01486414]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
oldest.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-02-03 12:20 [#01486415]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
oldest
|
|
nacmat
on 2005-02-03 12:21 [#01486416]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
newest
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-02-03 12:21 [#01486417]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
I never really noticed that. I am going to try it out, but make no guarantees as to how long I am going to keep it this way.
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2005-02-03 12:22 [#01486420]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict
|
|
Oldest.
|
|
vlari
from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-02-03 12:24 [#01486421]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular
|
|
Newest first.
Pro's: no need to go to the last post in a thread that's longer than Metusale's lifespan (like post your picture & now playing).
Cons: It tends to make me read threads "backwards"
|
|
FlyAgaric
from the discovery (Africa) on 2005-02-03 12:34 [#01486430]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular
|
|
oldest. newest first is like attending a funeral without having known the person.
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-02-03 18:42 [#01486890]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular
|
|
oldest, i like to read things in chronological order, not memento stylee
|
|
TehLaw
from around. (Canada) on 2005-02-03 18:44 [#01486894]
Points: 242 Status: Regular
|
|
newest case on this board in the time it takes ot get from oldest to newest and then mae a rleevant post your relevant post becomes irrelevant as 150983509436 other posts are made
|
|
i_x_ten
from arsemuncher on 2005-02-03 18:46 [#01486898]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular
|
|
oldest first. most logical innit
|
|
TehLaw
from around. (Canada) on 2005-02-03 18:48 [#01486902]
Points: 242 Status: Regular
|
|
depends on your logic.
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-02-03 18:54 [#01486914]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to TehLaw: #01486902
|
|
yours however, is broken
|
|
OK
on 2005-02-04 01:01 [#01487100]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
oldest
|
|
Matvey
from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2005-02-04 01:16 [#01487105]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular
|
|
newest.
forever.
|
|
Bob Mcbob
on 2005-02-04 02:36 [#01487145]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular
|
|
oldest
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-02-04 02:42 [#01487150]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Newest first.
There was a massive thread about this before I think where people argued for both sides. It was funny.
|
|
Messageboard index
|