|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:02 [#01485877]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Certainly, Jivver, but I'm talking on analord 10 ... not 1.
analord 10 reacts at a slow pitch, much in the way DrukQs does ... beautifully!
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:08 [#01485880]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
"I heard 1&2 and felt like it was worse than 10. I only listened to it once. I had no more need or want to listen to
it more. "
There are more than twelve things wrong with the previous given sentences. can you find 2? Go on!!!
--seriously, i think you guys are losing touch on the "idea" of music ... and concentrating too much on the revolution of music.
what do you expect, and are you aware of the current year we are living in?
|
|
revpersona
from Plainfield (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:16 [#01485885]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker
|
|
Analord (the first volume released) being standalone is OK. It's nothing special, but it's nothing bad either.
It's just....I can't let it be standalone. There's so much better sounding stuff from the late 80s and early 90s that put those two tracks to shame. I hope the tracks improve as the releases go on, because as of now.....I am dissapointed. RDJ's older analogue material was even much better than this.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:19 [#01485888]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
maybe you don't understand, this *is* RDJs older material.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2005-02-02 23:27 [#01485890]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to brokephones: #01485815 | Show recordbag
|
|
hahahaha..... "nyes"
|
|
revpersona
from Plainfield (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:29 [#01485891]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01485888
|
|
Never heard of such a thing reguarding these releases. Is there any proof to this or is this all speculation?
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2005-02-02 23:31 [#01485892]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to revpersona: #01485891 | Show recordbag
|
|
I think maybe he was being figurative... actually to be honest I'm not sure.
|
|
furoi
from Udine (Eriko Sato's undies) (Italy) on 2005-02-03 00:45 [#01485905]
Points: 1706 Status: Lurker
|
|
i don't like druqks so much, i listened to analord and they are just classica rephlex afx analogue fuckin style, they are sufficient.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2005-02-03 00:53 [#01485908]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
im on elusive's side
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-02-03 00:59 [#01485910]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Drukqswasoneofhisworst!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Wolfslice
from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2005-02-03 01:40 [#01485921]
Points: 4911 Status: Lurker
|
|
Analord 10 was almost on par with DrukQs, after many listens. But Analord 1 and 2 brought down my anticipation for the rest of the series with preset sounds and strutcure that were below the level of the Aphex we know and love.
I would trade all of the rest of the Analords in the series to hold the new Autechre in my hands right now instead of April :(
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-03 06:20 [#01486031]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
WOLFSLICE, FOR THE LAST TIME.
ANALORD 10 WAS RELEASED BY APHEX TWIN
ANALORD 1 AND 2 WERE RELEASED BY "AFX"
THERE IS A LARGE DIFFERENCE, SIR!
lol can no one grasp this ?!
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2005-02-03 06:38 [#01486043]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
i like analord. 1, 2 and 10. im beggining to love them... pure emotion.
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2005-02-03 06:42 [#01486046]
Points: 12428 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01485888
|
|
So what?
Even if this was true, it wouldn't make the music any better.
And get off your high horse, cretinface.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-03 07:00 [#01486061]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
high horse? i'm just trying to get people to realize they are completely different styles from different time periods.
a lot of people are taking the 1 & 2 release as if it was some post-drukqs groundbreaking stuff.
nah, just the basic elements that we've come to know
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2005-02-03 07:04 [#01486070]
Points: 12428 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01486061
|
|
Yeah, we're all grateful, thanks for opening our eyes.
Anyway, what are your sources?
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-02-03 21:20 [#01487012]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to stefano_azevedo: #01485147
|
|
"analord is maybe better than i care because you do and draw
with come to daddy and rdj album. "
so youre saying i care... is worse than come to daddy and rdj?
i think your argument is officially moot
|
|
OK
on 2005-02-04 00:52 [#01487096]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
I agree with the drukqs thing.
|
|
Wolfslice
from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2005-02-04 00:55 [#01487097]
Points: 4911 Status: Lurker
|
|
dude i could give a shit less what alais he released it under. It's Richard D. James and we know what he's capable of. Plus there is pleanty of AFX stuff I actually like, such as AB 5 and Smojphace.
SO ELUSIVE FOR THE LAST TIME
I don't give a fuck about a name
|
|
Messageboard index
|