analord sucks | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 447 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614196
Today 0
Topics 127547
  
 
Messageboard index
analord sucks
 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:02 [#01485877]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Certainly, Jivver, but I'm talking on analord 10 ... not 1.

analord 10 reacts at a slow pitch, much in the way DrukQs
does ... beautifully!


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:08 [#01485880]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"I heard 1&2 and felt like it was worse than 10. I only
listened to it once. I had no more need or want to listen
to
it more. "


There are more than twelve things wrong with the previous
given sentences. can you find 2? Go on!!!

--seriously, i think you guys are losing touch on the "idea"
of music ... and concentrating too much on the revolution of
music.

what do you expect, and are you aware of the current year we
are living in?


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:16 [#01485885]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker



Analord (the first volume released) being standalone is OK.
It's nothing special, but it's nothing bad either.

It's just....I can't let it be standalone. There's so much
better sounding stuff from the late 80s and early 90s that
put those two tracks to shame. I hope the tracks improve as
the releases go on, because as of now.....I am dissapointed.
RDJ's older analogue material was even much better than
this.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:19 [#01485888]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



maybe you don't understand, this *is* RDJs older material.



 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-02-02 23:27 [#01485890]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to brokephones: #01485815 | Show recordbag



hahahaha..... "nyes"


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2005-02-02 23:29 [#01485891]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01485888



Never heard of such a thing reguarding these releases. Is
there any proof to this or is this all speculation?


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-02-02 23:31 [#01485892]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to revpersona: #01485891 | Show recordbag



I think maybe he was being figurative... actually to be
honest I'm not sure.


 

offline furoi from Udine (Eriko Sato's undies) (Italy) on 2005-02-03 00:45 [#01485905]
Points: 1706 Status: Lurker



i don't like druqks so much, i listened to analord and they
are just classica rephlex afx analogue fuckin style, they
are sufficient.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2005-02-03 00:53 [#01485908]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



im on elusive's side


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-02-03 00:59 [#01485910]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Drukqswasoneofhisworst!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2005-02-03 01:40 [#01485921]
Points: 4911 Status: Lurker



Analord 10 was almost on par with DrukQs, after many
listens. But Analord 1 and 2 brought down my anticipation
for the rest of the series with preset sounds and strutcure
that were below the level of the Aphex we know and love.

I would trade all of the rest of the Analords in the series
to hold the new Autechre in my hands right now instead of
April :(


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-03 06:20 [#01486031]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



WOLFSLICE, FOR THE LAST TIME.

ANALORD 10 WAS RELEASED BY APHEX TWIN

ANALORD 1 AND 2 WERE RELEASED BY "AFX"

THERE IS A LARGE DIFFERENCE, SIR!

lol can no one grasp this ?!


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2005-02-03 06:38 [#01486043]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



i like analord. 1, 2 and 10. im beggining to love them...
pure emotion.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-02-03 06:42 [#01486046]
Points: 12428 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01485888



So what?

Even if this was true, it wouldn't make the music any
better.

And get off your high horse, cretinface.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-02-03 07:00 [#01486061]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



high horse? i'm just trying to get people to realize they
are completely different styles from different time
periods.

a lot of people are taking the 1 & 2 release as if it was
some post-drukqs groundbreaking stuff.

nah, just the basic elements that we've come to know


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-02-03 07:04 [#01486070]
Points: 12428 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01486061



Yeah, we're all grateful, thanks for opening our eyes.

Anyway, what are your sources?


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-02-03 21:20 [#01487012]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to stefano_azevedo: #01485147



"analord is maybe better than i care because you do and
draw
with come to daddy and rdj album. "

so youre saying i care... is worse than come to daddy and
rdj?

i think your argument is officially moot


 

offline OK on 2005-02-04 00:52 [#01487096]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



I agree with the drukqs thing.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2005-02-04 00:55 [#01487097]
Points: 4911 Status: Lurker



dude i could give a shit less what alais he released it
under. It's Richard D. James and we know what he's capable
of. Plus there is pleanty of AFX stuff I actually like, such
as AB 5 and Smojphace.

SO ELUSIVE FOR THE LAST TIME

I don't give a fuck about a name


 


Messageboard index