did it come up to our expectations? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 521 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614206
Today 10
Topics 127548
  
 
Messageboard index
did it come up to our expectations?
 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-12 03:26 [#01454390]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I think back in early ninetees, there were huge
expectations with the future of music, seeing what they were
seeing with the first albums by aphex, autechre, lfo, b12,
orbital, the orb...

I think there was like an euphoria, cos lots of new field
had been openned for the first time... hence all the
artificial intelligence and all those things, there was a
general feeling that music was gonna make a huge change...

the question is... do you think this is at last happening?
did the music revolution come up to your expectations?

seeing the music that was done 15 years ago and now... do
you think that the revolution was worth it? was it even
culminated? was it abandoned at half the way?

dont you think that maybe music now (electronic) is based on
anecdotes more than in true concepts?

yesterday I listened to saw 85-92, brown album, frequencies
and electro soma.

personally I think it all went perfect till 2001... but I
doubt if there has been any advance since then... nothing
looks more advanced to me than confield... squarepusher
never reached what he got with go plastic, not to talk about
aphex since drukqs (and now he seems to look back to the
analog era) plaid doesnt seem to sound as fresh as in the
mid ninetees... boc has never evolved since 98...

there are some new artits and some of them are great... but
they dont seem to bring a revolution... its more like more
rounds to the same square

what do you think?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-01-12 03:28 [#01454391]
Points: 12430 Status: Regular



I haven't seen any revolution.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-01-12 03:29 [#01454394]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaj another "electronic music nowdays
suck" thread.


 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-12 03:31 [#01454395]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01454394



no it doesnt suck
I like it a lot


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-01-12 04:01 [#01454413]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Damn good topic mate.

I don't think the whole face of music has changed as much as
people thought, but it's nice that there is new stuff as
well as the sort of things that would have existed anyway
(rock, pop, hip hop, etc.) and also combinations of the two
(rap/pop with "IDM" stylings for example).

I like the way we've moved away from combinations of
repetative loops into very complex programming (drukqs,
latest m-ziq, []pusher, SM pennyworth, etc.) I think it
shows a maturity of the artform. Of course, we can still use
repetative loops out of choice, but now it's a bit more in
moderation. Don't get me wrong, I love hypnotic minimal
techno and acid, but it's good there's other stuff too.


 

offline S M Pennyworth from East Timor on 2005-01-12 04:04 [#01454414]
Points: 2196 Status: Lurker



music is something highly relative to me,
so i'm having difficulties splitting it all into periods and
stuff,
i just go from one thing to another every other day.
in my opinion theres something new and exciting all the
time, its just a matter of looking in the right places. and
music will never cease to evolve, its been breaking new
grounds since the first piece ever written.

as for squarepusher and everybody else, every release since
the first one has been new and unique in different ways, and
when a thing like "go plastic" surfaces its just a "natural"
leap in many different directions. people just can't go
around waiting for the new "go plastic", "dyks?" or whatever
they might fancy a lot, cause it's always going to be
something new. and drukqs, i remember everybody on here
"hated" it in the beginning, maybe cause people got confused
or something, however, thats not the general opinion
nowadays.

i also think the melodical bits, and the arrangements are
so much more "important" than the technical advancements,
and aligning of the two, naturally takes time.
just look at classical music for instance, it can be really
mindblowing and extremely futuristic at times, if you like.
theres lots of new, great electronic music but i don't have
time to go and look up new stuff myself, and i can't go and
wait for music to evolve cause i'm busy listening to whats
here now.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-01-12 04:31 [#01454423]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to S M Pennyworth: #01454414 | Show recordbag



Mate, you never posted me that CD we talked about last
year!

I'll paypal you for posting, etc. Email me if you want to
discuss this further.

Thanks and happy new year.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-01-12 05:07 [#01454431]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to nacmat: #01454390 | Show recordbag



I think you have some very good points there. I actually had
been thinking about that quite recently too. I believe that
maybe, quite possibly, everything that can be done has been
done and the major artists are waiting for new technology so
they can do something new. But then you ask, is it all about
the technology? Maybe it's the structure?

I can see a good future in mixing different styles of music
as this hasn't been done too much. Like Ochre's timberlake
remix is a good example. I think more pop/idm tracks should
be made as there is potential, plus it's new and different.

Saying this though, we haven't heard Analord yet. You never
know, it could be amazing, better than drukqs even.
Although, I'm not pushing my hopes up too high just in case.


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2005-01-12 05:20 [#01454437]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



ultravisitor was a step beyond, a lot much better than
goplastic.
drukqs has the most incredible tracks ive ever heard, a
reflexation in the frontiers between electronic and acoustic
music.
i cannot talk about 90s expectatiions as i wasnt there and
dont know a fuck about it, but i think the evolution of
braindance have been incredible and unexpected, a music
opened to time and space never predicted. i think electronic
music has reached another dimention totally different of
what the people in 90s thought...


 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-12 05:37 [#01454443]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to melack: #01454437



nice view

gotta think of it

I relally love new autechre, team doyobi, snares...


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-01-12 05:50 [#01454455]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01454431



I think your point is valid in the sense that the electronic
scene influences artist in other areas of music. Idm-ish pop
might make the artists cast away the old tricks and invent
some new. But the revisiting of old styles might be a refuge
from the demand of always evolving soundwise, which is a
common one in the fanbase. On the other hand it might also
serve as a homage to the music the artist loves and want the
"kids" to appreciate it too.

I agree with nacmat regarding Confield, and Draft didn't
seem to have the logical progression that I found in
previous Autechre releases. I think I read in some interwiev
that Draft in fact was a step backwards, atleast in the way
it was created.

Ponderings aside, I really don't care so much about the
progression as I do about tunes and the completeness of a
release. A record can be as innovative as it wants, but if
it aint got "the feeling", I can't be bothered with it.



 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-01-12 06:10 [#01454482]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



Nobody ever really became the next Aphex Twin, electronic
music was relying on Aphex and Liam Howlett to hold the fort
until it could survive on it's own but nobody ever came
along with a genuinely new direction that worked out.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2005-01-12 06:12 [#01454485]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



i reckon we just took it too seriously and it lost its fun


 

offline Skeptopotamus from Home (United Kingdom) on 2005-01-12 06:13 [#01454486]
Points: 625 Status: Regular



People are too busy either trying to emulate what Boards of
Canada, Autechre, Squarepusher and Aphex were doing half a
decade ago, or getting lost in this silly Shitmat/Snares
breakcore movement. 95% of 'internet artists' I've heared
fall into this category.

Obviously musicians are going to have elements of their
favourite artists appear in their work via influence, but
some of the things I've heared over the last few years has
been a disappointing reflection on how electronic music is
progressing.


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2005-01-12 06:34 [#01454498]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker | Followup to Skeptopotamus: #01454486



I don't think there's much diffrence between the trends in
electronic music and other genres. Someone puts out an idea
or sound thats unique, other people imiatate or expand on
it. I love all the early stuff too but it sounds like the
Warp roster was stuck on a single idea. Plus, the melodies
were pretty basic and too reliant on the style coming out of
Detroit at the time. I do think the genre has come a long
way since then regarding things like texture, warmth,
sutlety... Things are more detailed and refined now. I
personally prefer labels like K12, Touch, Mego that combine
electronics, aucustics and noise into a freeform structure
that typical IDM doesn't do. Maybe electronic music has to
move away from it's dance origins to progress?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-01-12 06:49 [#01454512]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



personally i think they could do a lot better with all the
hi-tec equipment these days (one of the few people that
takes advantages of this stuff is richard devine imo)..music
is still about the idea whether it is made in a classic way
or with computers. a lot of it is getting really boring,
most of the artists nowdays think they're doing something
really advanced, but what good is that if the music more or
less sucks :)
i'll shut up now.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-01-12 07:17 [#01454539]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tolstoyed: #01454512 | Show recordbag



Yeah, there's a lot of stuff that's interesting techincally,
but gash as music. A lot of non-popular turntabilism falls
into this. I love listening and working out what they're
doing, or listening to production work in pop songs and
thinking about how I'd replicate a particular sound etc.
(guess that makes me guilty of what skeptopotamous mentioned
;-), but often the actual music isn't that great.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-01-12 07:24 [#01454546]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01454539



hmm, maybe it didn't sound the way i meant it. it's great
there are so many people doing music, makes it easier for
everyone to find something for themselves to enjoy. but in
general there really isn't some sort of musical improvment,
there were perhaps just as many interesting artists 15 years
ago as there are now, and they both made/make exciting
music..and i don't mind replicating, sampling,..one bit as
long as it is interesting :)


 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-13 15:09 [#01456855]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I dont say I dont like what we have now... the music done
nowadays is great.... but I was just wondering if we are
living in ages of big changes like in the early ninetees or
not

I think not... this is not a time of big changes... some
musicians are making real gems of music but not changing the
direction of music me thinks


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-01-13 15:12 [#01456863]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



stuff is ok


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-01-13 15:13 [#01456864]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



what is the question again?


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2005-01-13 15:22 [#01456884]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



I think you're just pining for your youth and using the
music as an excuse.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2005-01-13 16:00 [#01456991]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01454390



I think I understand what you're getting at. I thought about
this phenomenon often, and I thank you for addressing it
here.

There does seem to be a sort of stagnation in the trend of
music development recently, but it's probably just confined
to the major Warp label artists we recognize.
I read an article on the music industry a few months ago,
and it stated that overall revenue has gone up, but less so
from the major monopolistic record labels and more from
smaller independent ones.

My theory is that these days we may just have to dig harder
for the sounds we want. I'm sure there's plenty of artists
out there who make the kind of electronic music we like, but
their music may be harder to find and obtain than what you
see/hear when you access sites of bigger record labels like
Warp.



 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-01-13 16:15 [#01457029]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



Great thread!

IMO Ultravisitor was the only album in a few years that
pushed the IDM envelope. I think Snares at his most cerebral
has done some very interesting stuff also that's quite
unique. The whole early 90s aethetic was so interesting
because it was associated strongly with the future and the
explosion in technology advances. I think that aethetic
became something of a cliche recently.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-01-13 17:02 [#01457140]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



this kind of thread makes me want to run away screaming.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-01-13 17:20 [#01457176]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



with these two i can't agree:

"plaid doesnt seem to sound as fresh as in the
mid ninetees... boc has never evolved since 98..."

compare rest proof to spokes
compare mhtrtc to geogaddi

and HEAR the difference


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-01-13 17:23 [#01457181]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to obara: #01457176



I'm sorry, I don't hear that big a difference between MHTRTC
and Geogaddi. it may be tweaked here and there, but to me it
does sound like more of the same.

I like MHTRTC better anyway.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2005-01-13 17:24 [#01457183]
Points: 40075 Status: Regular



i reckon' i like music a lot


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2005-01-13 17:26 [#01457185]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



There's not just Warp, you know.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-01-13 17:31 [#01457197]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01457181



then you prefer old BOC to new BOC, old hiphop loops to new
caleidoscope loops, no problem. right, it may sound quite
the same. but geogaddi is leaving hiphop a bit aside - which
is nice

M-C better ? why ?


 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-13 18:33 [#01457310]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to pachi: #01457185



I know

qrter... sorry if I didnt excite your brain with my thread..
I never was the intelligent guy in xlt... and lately I have
to make efforts to think of a thread starter
but I really found this thread could be at least a little
interesting


 

offline OK on 2005-01-14 00:21 [#01457669]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



idm's mutating into accesible.


 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-14 01:53 [#01457729]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



my fav artists right now, the ones that make music I enjoy
more lately are:

team doyobi
snares
squarepusher
autechre
ooo
mr 76ix
richard devine



 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2005-01-14 02:16 [#01457769]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Inverted Whale: #01456884



i second that...

imagine all the people getting into more free kind of music
(electronic or not) at this time, i think it's AT LEAST as
exciting for them as it was for us ten or five years ago...

i mean there's just so much to discover, enjoy, create
beside all the classics that are already present, the stuff
was more limited in quantity in the early nineties and there
was no internet facilities like now...

so i think it just goes down to the excitement each and
every person feels at any given moment, and not to the music
itself...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-01-14 02:18 [#01457774]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to OK: #01457669 | Show recordbag



Or, accessible music is mutating into IDM (pop is getting
IDM stylings, rather than the other way round...)


 

offline nacmat on 2005-01-14 02:20 [#01457781]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01457774



seconded


 


Messageboard index