|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 04:30 [#01411513]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular
|
|
Chapter 2: "the fag sandwich of the universe" by wym
hello snaggle hofs: : ioisfthink about different things/actions in reverse (films where water falls up into rain clouds.. the sun absorbing energy/light from earth.. erasing knowledge by unlearning backwards.. falling up from a splatter to a bridge in reverse suicide)
At first it would seem strange for an individual to walk backwards and take away information from another persons brain by untalking to them.. but if the rest of the universe was operating this way too, it would make it strangely logical in relation.
A man killed with a knife would be unkilled with that knife. It would really be the equivalent of birth. People would reverse bury humans, who would all get younger until they do the "backwards universe" equivalent of dying which is being given reverse birth to and eventually shrinking and dividing into two sex cells from two different bodies. How does something like evolution operate in reverse? People would drive backwards. How would they "know" which way to go then since they are looking forward? The information of where to turn was previously in their brain, so they just rewind to that information and delete it. The driver wouldn't even be "looking" at the road. He'd be "unlooking" at it, as the light (and information) leaves his eyes and reflects back toward the sun. All light would do that, not just the small fraction he saw of course. Information would constantly be leaving our brain, exported out through the senses. Information would be changed into mechanical energy int the ear for example and send out a wave of reverse sound that would suck in towards its source.
*post*
|
|
bill_hicks
from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-12-01 04:34 [#01411515]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01411513
|
|
profound.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 04:40 [#01411519]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular
|
|
chapter doubleyou 3: "the return of Jafar" by WWF
what if a person living in that backwards universe tried to picture our "forward" one?... It seems like they can't simply because thinking and learning aren't what they do. They unthink and unlearn (but take equal ammounts of time and effort doing it given that their backwards universe moves at the same tempo). What if I, right now, tried to unlearn information. If that played in reverse it would be their equivalent of learning. Whether they think or unthink is maybe the wrong question. Information simply behaves differently in their universe. They wouldn't be any more automaticalishlyish than us simply because their universe is backwards. They would "be" and feel things with equally powerful emotional sensations only backwards. How would that feel though? They'd have a moment of reverse fear until they unsaw a lion.. they'd be just as deep and real as us.. they'd sit down, spending the same ammount of time we do to watch a movie, to unwatch it. Or to unread a book and unthink complex thoughts. Sex would be odd; women would squirt semen into men's penises. They would unwrite stuff, tracing backwards over it as the pencil collects the lead. or graphite or whatever the FUCKING HELL it is.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 04:50 [#01411525]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular
|
|
Chapter eight fag: "the evolution of barf" by peter frampton
Ok, so let's suppose that the universe operates in a way where it is a giant program, the actions of which repeatedly go forward and reverse. (I forgot to mention the bizarre idea that WE might currently be the ones in the reverse universe and THEY are in the true forward one.. of course this is just for fun since they can only be labeled as such relative to eachother). Well, if the universe does this, I wonder if would go in reverse EXACTLY the same way as it went forward. OR if there would be occasional action "mutations". The latter seems plausibly santa clausy plausable what? and if so it would mean that each successive cycle of going forward/reverse would accumulate mutations from the previous directions's errors. This would mean the universe would, eventually, evolve to become drastically different than it is now. Or perhaps there is a limit on what exactly is mutatable (things just continue to be matter limited by restrictions in physics like gravity/space etc and can only change so much.. then again, given the enormous time spans and the way actions have dominoe and "butterfly" effects, maybe it could change drastically). Maybe action is just "gooey" and it occurs basically the same each time, but in slightly different ways.
|
|
bryce_berny
from chronno (Canada) on 2004-12-01 08:37 [#01411718]
Points: 1568 Status: Lurker
|
|
you simply subdivide by it's cosine
|
|
weatheredstoner
from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-12-01 09:18 [#01411753]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker
|
|
If things do end up going in reverse, we wouldn't notice.
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-12-01 09:18 [#01411756]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'm pretty sure we're going in reverse right now.
|
|
bill_hicks
from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-12-01 14:38 [#01412135]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01411525
|
|
you are really scaring me now. fucking hell what sort of life must you lead? to spend all your days writing this wankfest of steam of consciouspissness must mean you are either some sort of sad lonely man trying to communicate with the world that he no longer understands or you're just a psycho. so just in case the latter is true i apologise to you and wish you all the best.
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2004-12-01 14:43 [#01412150]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #01412135
|
|
god help him if he was a bitter cynic.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 17:49 [#01412453]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01411753
|
|
... that's a good point. For the rest of my life I will concentrate on unthinking thoughts rather than thinking them. That way, when the universe goes backwards, I will be the only one thinking.
|
|
-crazone
from smashing acid over and over on 2004-12-01 17:59 [#01412465]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
are you related to Einstein? cause his Big Bang theory includes that all will return eventually to the core of the big bang, creating a new big bang, and so on and so on and so on..
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2004-12-01 18:00 [#01412467]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to -crazone: #01412465
|
|
are you sure he said that?
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 18:17 [#01412499]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular | Followup to -crazone: #01412465
|
|
Einstein was one of my earlier failed experiments cloning myself back in time (which will actually be later when the universe reverses). Technically I cloned him on the last "reversed" direction of the universe, but I don't want to get into that. I only had a gram of intelligence batter (it required 5 grams), so I just substituted eggs. Resultingly he (I) was an imbecile compared to me, though smarter than the majority of humanity still of course. Given my predicament, I just screwed around and had fun concocting bizarre theories straight out of my ass that everybody believed and never combed my hair. It was a pretty fun life actually.
|
|
-crazone
from smashing acid over and over on 2004-12-01 18:41 [#01412542]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
LOL,
and yes he said that; where did you think this mass of the explosion came from? nowhere?
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-12-01 18:50 [#01412559]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #01412465
|
|
are you related to Einstein? cause his Big Bang theory includes that all will return eventually to the core of the
big bang, creating a new big bang, and so on and so on and so on..
Internet science history at it's finest.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 20:11 [#01412646]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular
|
|
give him a break. He states explicitly that he's from crazybrains on a dish.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-12-01 20:17 [#01412652]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker
|
|
if i say "gaf"
you can look at taht wod in the mirror
other than that i think that ian knoll has given prolific details onto which he speaks, all hail
|
|
bill_hicks
from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-12-02 03:15 [#01412882]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01412646
|
|
you are so clever!
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-02 03:18 [#01412884]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #01412882
|
|
Did you add this thread to your favourites, ball?
|
|
bill_hicks
from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-12-02 03:19 [#01412886]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01412884
|
|
i'm itching to see what the next chapter brings.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2004-12-02 03:28 [#01412887]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01411513
|
|
somebody's been watching red dwarf, i think
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2004-12-02 12:42 [#01413319]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
crazybrains
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2004-12-02 13:14 [#01413354]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
you're missing chapters..
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2004-12-02 13:16 [#01413356]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #01413354
|
|
and we're waiting for the thrilling (anti)conclusion. no, wait. i didn't actually read all of it. But i did get a cheap little laugh from "'the return of Jafar' by WWF" for some strange reason.
|
|
Dozier
from United States on 2004-12-02 20:10 [#01413699]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker
|
|
i heard from someone about some person that had this theory that we were actually travelling back in time. he likened it to driving down a road: you see what's coming in front of you, but not what's behind you. well, apply that to time and we see what's already happened (the past [some of us]) but not what hasn't (the future [some of us]). so, what we think of as the past is actually the future and vice versa.
|
|
-crazone
from smashing acid over and over on 2004-12-02 21:28 [#01413747]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
its true..otherwise einstein is wrong
|
|
OK
on 2004-12-03 16:44 [#01414965]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
are u in first grade?
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-12-03 17:16 [#01414985]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
this is too fast. the letters are on.
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-12-03 20:43 [#01415091]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #01413747
|
|
Dude, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, the big bang theory stemmed mainly from the discovery of the Hubble constant.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2004-12-04 01:21 [#01415137]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
crazone you should be deported for the things youve said in this thread. also those dogs avatars make no sense AT ALLLLLLLL
|
|
OK
on 2004-12-04 09:27 [#01415329]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
you should read a book by Italo Calvino. called the cosmicómics or something like that i guess.
in spanish it's "las comsmicomicas". it's like what you wrote only a lot better
|
|
-crazone
from smashing acid over and over on 2004-12-04 09:58 [#01415340]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
"also those dogs avatars make no sense AT ALLLLLLLL" does that include your space dog from hell?
|
|
Messageboard index
|