did you realize | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
Roger Wilco
DADONCK
...and 373 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614148
Today 20
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
did you realize
 

offline welt on 2004-10-14 10:22 [#01363035]
Points: 2036 Status: Lurker



did you realize it's 2004? i remember 2003 well, but 2004
seems like it didn't exist / doesn't exist: no memories.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-10-14 10:23 [#01363038]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



hmm. that is an interesting thought. Well 2004 has Grand
Theft Auto: San Andreas


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-10-14 10:23 [#01363040]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i thought it was 2005...ah well.


 

offline dopper from Bern (Switzerland) on 2004-10-14 10:27 [#01363053]
Points: 436 Status: Addict | Followup to welt: #01363035



no i didn't. thanks for the tip, i'll be sure to check my
calendar more often from now on.


 

offline ChildrenTalking from United States on 2004-10-14 10:28 [#01363057]
Points: 2712 Status: Addict



my friend thought the same thing. i suppose it seems that
way when you look back at it all. if you look at in a
scientific perspective peoples long term memory is shit. so
that would explain the feeling of a short time lapse within
an entire year.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-10-14 10:28 [#01363058]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



haha


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-10-14 10:31 [#01363068]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i'm still thinking it's '89


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-10-14 10:32 [#01363070]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to epohs: #01363068



i wish it was...i'd change everything.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2004-10-14 10:46 [#01363095]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to ChildrenTalking: #01363057



"if you look at in a
scientific perspective peoples long term memory is shit"

bollocks.

sorry but thats just stupid and incorrect


 

offline Hetzel from Montreal (Canada) on 2004-10-14 10:50 [#01363105]
Points: 551 Status: Regular



in the year 3030
everybody wants to be a MC

-deltron 3030


 

offline Hetzel from Montreal (Canada) on 2004-10-14 10:50 [#01363108]
Points: 551 Status: Regular



In the year 3030
everybody wants to be a DJ.

-deltron 3030


 

offline ChildrenTalking from United States on 2004-10-14 10:50 [#01363109]
Points: 2712 Status: Addict | Followup to i_x_ten: #01363095



if you're going to accuse me of saying something 'stupid' i
wish you'd back up your side of the argument. from what i've
read in science books and lectured in classes, its a very
well known fact - that humans are incapable of holding
memory very well unless its for a short period of time
(short term memory). i mean for god sakes humans have an
attention span of 5 seconds, let alone try to remember
something 4 months back. yeah in your dreams :)


 

offline Hetzel from Montreal (Canada) on 2004-10-14 10:51 [#01363110]
Points: 551 Status: Regular



In the year 3030,
everybody wants to be a producer.

-deltron 3030


 

offline warh0l from <----- on 2004-10-14 10:52 [#01363114]
Points: 226 Status: Lurker



perception of time seems to distort after a couple decades.
i guess the world doesn't seem so 'vast and mysterious' as
it had when we were younger. i think we all get so caught up
in the busy-everyday-9to5 life, that we don't even realize
its even happening.

find the magic in the daily routine.


 

offline welt on 2004-10-14 10:57 [#01363118]
Points: 2036 Status: Lurker



but i have lots of memories from 2003, so your argument,
childrentalking, isn't convincing.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2004-10-14 11:05 [#01363128]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to ChildrenTalking: #01363109



i studied psychology for two years, i know a fair bit about
the memory. once a piece of information has been retained in
the STM(short term memory) for 30seconds, it enters the LTM
(long term memory). most would agree that the memories are
kept in the LTM for an indefinate duration, and that the
reason we can't remember them is because we have no cues, or
prompts... you probably won't remember where you were 17
days ago at 4.23pm, but why would you need to retain that?
no reason to remember them. often people with serious brain
damage, are unable to utilise their STM have an excellent
LTM. its fair to say the capacity of the memory is
indefinate but to prove this 100% would be impossible...



 

offline ChildrenTalking from United States on 2004-10-14 11:10 [#01363133]
Points: 2712 Status: Addict | Followup to welt: #01363118



you fail to understand good memory. yes everyone remembers
something which stood out in their life time since they were
probably about the age of 8 even, but thats besides the
point. you mentioned 2003 yes they're images some you can
correlate with one another but not a whole lot. you cannot
recall back in 2003 and know what conversation you happen to
have perchance or certain things you might've done in the
ceremony, unless they stood out for you. i forget what
mental phenomena is called but it has a name. where one
remembers certain things for reasons of distraught or shock.
anyways you also can't pinpoint any specific acts for the
most part. that is what i'm talking about. its not whether
humans can recall back to a point in time but what
necessarily occured in them. memories fade as time goes on
you cannot deny that and it becomes harder to hold onto them
unless you remind yourself of them.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2004-10-14 11:16 [#01363136]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



ok this isn't really going anywhere.

forget what
mental phenomena is called but it has a name. (flashbulb
memories)


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-14 11:18 [#01363138]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Mark the difference between i_x_ten's coherent post, and
ChildrenTalkings rambling inanity. One knows what they're
talking about, the other is gabbling in the lonely void.


 

offline welt on 2004-10-14 11:21 [#01363141]
Points: 2036 Status: Lurker



childrentalking, in the first post you were saying: an
entire year seems short, because long term memory is shit
and you forget most of it, right?
then it's a general thing that would have to go for all
years.
of course i dont remember irrelevant details from 2003, but
i remember many events from 2004, i hardly rember any or
anything from 2004. that was the point.
but this discussion is needless.


 

offline welt on 2004-10-14 11:22 [#01363144]
Points: 2036 Status: Lurker



it should have been "i remember many events from 2003" not
"from 2004".


 

offline ChildrenTalking from United States on 2004-10-14 11:27 [#01363147]
Points: 2712 Status: Addict | Followup to i_x_ten: #01363136



i think its depending on the cue or reminder, which triggers
back the dramatic exp. only certain fragments of the total
memory may be activated.


 


Messageboard index