|
|
rudster
from the glasgow on 2004-08-08 20:12 [#01299226]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAW
looks fucked up
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2004-08-08 20:14 [#01299229]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
looks nice...could be alright.
|
|
Key_Secret
from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-08-08 20:18 [#01299238]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01299229
|
|
I agree...
|
|
ChildrenTalking
from United States on 2004-08-08 20:41 [#01299278]
Points: 2712 Status: Addict
|
|
saw stands for selected ambient WAAAAARRRRR!!!!!!!...no?
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2004-08-08 21:15 [#01299351]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
looks pointless
|
|
Torley Wong
on 2004-08-08 23:53 [#01299409]
Points: 235 Status: Lurker
|
|
The first trailer really creeped me out.
But the second one, with the man doing a HIDEOUS impersonation of a gerbil on speed, had me laughing out louder than me taking a lookie at ol' Abbott and Costello.
I hope the movie is more of the former than the latter.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-08-09 02:33 [#01299436]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
It could be a good film if they don't purely work on the "shock" factor. Although with the tagline "How fucked up is that?" they could well be. I hope it's good though.
|
|
Messageboard index
|