|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-08-13 07:13 [#01302987]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
I don't think there's any weak tracks on ultravisitor at all, I thought the albums sucked for the longest time, but after repeated listenings,.. I know better know...
|
|
uzim
on 2004-08-13 07:58 [#01302999]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
both should be shorter (55 minutes would have done it for me, 80 or 100 is too much) and have their effect clouded by "filler" tracks... both have very excellent stuff, but i don't listen to either of them very often (i haven't listened to drukQs in its entirety for, maybe, a year). Ultravisitor flows better together, has less filler, and i'm more likely to listen to it in its entirety than drukQs...
so my vote goes to Ultravisitor.
but there is one album that is a bit similar, from some points of view (it is also very long and has a "massive" (can't explain...) feeling as well), to Ultravisitor or drukQs, yet better than those two, and managing to avoid any filler even though it is 4 CDs long:
Kesto (234.48:4) by Pan Sonic. i highly recommend it.
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-08-13 08:24 [#01303029]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
4 CD's? Cripes! the milkfactory loves it anyway
lovesit
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-08-13 08:24 [#01303030]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
thats nhappening a lot!
http://www.themilkfactory.co.uk/reviews/pansonic_kesto.htm
|
|
uzim
on 2004-08-13 10:40 [#01303269]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
yep, 4 CDs - total playing time 234 minutes 48 seconds.
AMG loves it too, and it's not even too expensive. (don't go for it blindly of course, not everyone loves it - but at least give it a try!)
|
|
Messageboard index
|