 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)recycle ...and 86 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2618562 Today 1 Topics 127845 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
FIVE HUNDRED FIDDY thousand DOLLARS because because a baby might have seen a boobie. OH NOES |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wtf?! That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard Bet Judy didn't have that problem |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
better watch out! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Fuck parents groups and anyone else who cares about a titty being visible on tv for half a second. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wealth is all relative. mind you she might need to lend her brother some money to bribe that judge |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
He can get his own boobies to flash - next time he goes in for a nose paring. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
he prefers the flat chested underdeveloped look |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
to boob or not to boob that is the question |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It's times like this I wish Bill Hicks (The ACTUAL Bill Hicks) was alive |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I recon the US needs to be introduced to Keith Chegwin They'll all be switching over to Janet's boob then just for something more aesthetically pleasing |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
good Lord. please remove me from this country. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
People probably sent her that amount of money in thanx of the thrill |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
for one saggy, brown tit? (two, if you count Justin Trousersnake). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
There's always fans I mean I bet whitney huston still has a fan club ! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, but there's also multi-million dollar porn-industry, who give you a lot more BANG for that there buck. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
OH NOES!!!!1 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this nation was founded on juedo/christian principles and as farfetched as it may seem to europeans or non-agnostic individuals religion does play a huge role on the way we americans penalize indecent exposure to a degree where it should not happen again. she was used as an example to the rest of the world, or should i say hollywood mainly. that being said i DO NOT agree a fine of that nature should be enforced to all performers who do break the law because for janet 350K is chump change and for some performers it really isnt. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
opps sorry 550K |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but she's not paying the fine. the stations are. basically they're being penalized for lax procedures regarding live broadcasts. i just think there are more important things... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"she was used as an example to the rest of the world, or should i say hollywood mainly." fuck that - the whole hullabaloo began because the advertisers saw their products being connencted to a flacid tit ans shat their pants. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i totally agree this energy should be conserved for more important matters. i made the point about all performers because i'm pretty sure i heard in the news the other day that some huge fine. i forgot exactly the figure exactly but it will be given to those who do break indecency law. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah maybe, but the advertisers had plenty of their own tits flying in the wind that day. broadcasters also received complaints about tasteless beer ads etc...i think this fiasco is more a reflection on America's puritanical obsession with sex and nudity than anything else. i guarantee...if she had taken out a sword and chopped off justin t's head and fake blood started spurting out, everyone would have laughed and NONE of this debate would be happening now. i guarantee it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
for christs sake, it's just a breast, not a penis or a vagina. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
awesome point dequalsrxt it creates a form of double standard. im not here defending the FCC but i do have a problem where she decided to do this. it was in front of millions of people during the super bowl half time show. it was sorta of tasteless and maybe she shouldn't have been fined but i do think she or whoever came up with the 'choreagraphy' should leave that for her personal concerts, not during a live sporting event. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
how silly... you can see boobies everywhere now, you have to be an ultra-puritan asexual hermit monk living in a cave with no light in mount Athos to be shocked by seeing one! *sigh* oh well... it doesn't even suprise me anymore, you get to see aberrant situations all the time now. (like boobies.) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I know !! Look at all the see through bra's in cataloges etc Bet the parents arnt so carefull to put THEM at the top shelf at home The whole thing is just pathetic |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Lloyd: You're It! Harry: You're It. Lloyd: You're it, Quitzies. Harry: Anti-quitzies. Lloyd: You're it. Harry: Quitzies, no anti-quitzies, no startzies Lloyd: You can't do that! Harry: You can to. Lloyd: Can not, stamp it! Harry: Can to, double stamp it, no erasies. Lloyd: Can not, triple stamp it, no erasies, touch blue make it true. Harry: No no no, you can't triple stamp a double stamp. Lloyd: La la la. Harry: You can't triple stamp a double stamp Lloyd. Lloyd: La la la la. Harry: You can't triple stamp a double stamp. Lloyd: La la la. Harry: Lloyd! Lloyd: La la la. Harry: Lloyd! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
there's nothing indecent about a breast - even one attached to someone as aesthetically displeasing as a jackson. im not joking.. there really is nothing indecent or offensive about them. the only sad and disgusting aspect to the event itself was the way in which jackson thought she could kickstart a failing career by affiliating herself with a younger, more successful pop star; and that exposing her breast would generate the interest in her that her music never could on it's own. as for this ongoing fuss, the event is totally undeserving of this. janet jackson has a victory of sorts, because people are STILL talking about her - which is what she wanted. and as for the frighteningly conservative people attempting to lynch someone for this painfully uninteresting "stunt".. i do wonder about the state of humanity sometimes: there is nothing indecent about a breast. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
by the way - i like the title of this thread. sounds like a kid's story |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Janet Jacksons boobs are ugly anyways... if anything it's going to turn kids off from porn, which frm the parents view is good isn't it? I don't see the big deal! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it'd take a million flaccid tits to turn me off porn :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
