|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:20 [#01214912]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
...hasn't anyone ever made a standard that whilst backwardly compatible with Midi is actually a lot more "plug and play" to use? You know, single cable/connector for send/recieve/thru, automatically detects channel clashes and reassigns devices accordingly, etc?
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-05-30 08:24 [#01214917]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker
|
|
what the hell are you talking about, ceri?
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:25 [#01214918]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I accept/understand by the nature of simplifying it there would be an element of a loss of fine control for real pros (for example, they may want several midi outs to clash), but for your averagbe user it'd be heaven sent. Most people just want a link between sequencers & synths and also midi controllers to synths/sequencers.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:26 [#01214920]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01214917 | Show recordbag
|
|
I know, how stupid of me to talk about midi on an electronic music board... I suppose I should of made a thread about potatoes instead. It would have gotten more replies.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-05-30 08:27 [#01214923]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01214920
|
|
Yowch! I didn't say you were stupid, I just asked what the hell you were talking about! Don't be so defensive!
|
|
KADO
from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 08:30 [#01214925]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular
|
|
I think Yamaha started doing Firewire connections. MIDI is cool but quite dated. A new standard is definetely needed.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:32 [#01214929]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01214923 | Show recordbag
|
|
I wasn't having a go at you, merely observing that despite there being at least 3 midi savvy people online, none of them decided to comment, whereas dozens of people have made/participated in nonsense threads in the past 24hrs. This doe not include your hunt/fireside chat threads. They are pure class.
I thought there might be some genuine reason for us still having to use a bloody horrendous protocol like midi and that they could shed some light on it :)
On a more serious note, if some midi guru can spare a half an hour on AIM/MSN/SS to help me solve my midi woes, I would be most grateful.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:33 [#01214932]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to KADO: #01214925 | Show recordbag
|
|
Yes, firewire/usb2 (not sure what the latency is like with the latter) connections would be ideal.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2004-05-30 08:35 [#01214933]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
how could you use a cable as tru, in and out at the same time?
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:41 [#01214936]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to JAroen: #01214933 | Show recordbag
|
|
The cable wouldn't, theoretically, howver, there could be two sets of twisted pair (with one half of a pair redundant) all in the same outer sheath cable and there would only need to be one connector. On devices that only had, say, midi out, the other wires would simply not be used, although the connection would be the same.
|
|
KADO
from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 08:44 [#01214938]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular
|
|
Usb and firewire can send multiple messages across the line, and do it without picking up all the interference that midi does. MIDI only transmits a few on off messages and needs 5 pins and a bulky interface.
|
|
KADO
from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 08:46 [#01214940]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular
|
|
So has anyone ever sampled a "PANIC" Loop? Those things can scare the hell out of you.
|
|
Rambling Madman
from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 09:40 [#01214975]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular
|
|
I think midi is great as it is, if a new standard was to be introduced it would be much more of a pain in the ass for people who own midi hardware. A simmilar problem would be the Gate/CV interface on the old Rolands etc, which was discontinued & now some classic bits of hardware are suffering from having to rely on dodgy interfaces to convert the data.
I think midi should be left alone........ maybe? =: s
....... altho, if it was done correctly it could be very interesting. I suppose it all depends.
|
|
teapot
from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-05-30 09:56 [#01214988]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular
|
|
i dont really know THAT much about midi ceri so i hope your not pissed i didnt respond, thats assuming you presumed i was midi savvy... which i wish i was.
i just have an evolution on a usb... does the job, however im not quite sure what your trying to get at by your query
|
|
rockenjohnny
from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-30 10:08 [#01215003]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker
|
|
ive been wanting a midi merging device since forever ..
|
|
zazen
on 2004-05-30 10:16 [#01215009]
Points: 184 Status: Regular
|
|
musicians seem to like old stuff like MIDI, Atari's, etc
so any new standards are unlikely to take hold easily
USB/Firewire would make a lot of sense though.
I think you can get USB keyboards for driving PC-based samplers etc software now ...
|
|
hepburnenthorpe
from sydney (Australia) on 2004-05-30 11:14 [#01215089]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker
|
|
ceri,
probably note really on the same path but, if your using fruityloops you should check out the dashboard. ive made dashboards that enable me to cross synths together. its also great for outboard gear. you simply design a dashboard to match the schemantics of your synth.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-05-30 11:20 [#01215101]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker
|
|
I always thought MIDI was a really bad version of a song which sounded like it cost 1p to make :D
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 17:11 [#01215499]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Rambling Madman: #01214975 | Show recordbag
|
|
That's why it should be backwardly compatible :P
Teapot: I knew you weren't a big midi h/w interfacing chap, I just thought you might of learnt more of it recently with your max/msp work (max is a lot of midi, right?)
Hepburnenthorpe: I was aware of that feature, but I've not used it yet. Thanks for the reminder though, I may well use that for something I'm looking to buy soon...
To everyone: Sorry, re-reading this thread now I've calmed down a bit and it I really didn't make it clear what my technical problem was, I turned it into a general midi (no pun intended) rant. I suppose my original question/statement should have been:
I'm having a lot of difficulties getting an electribe to receive Sysex data from my PC. I know the midi port of my soundcard works okay, well, "midi in" does at least, my phat boy midi controller works fine with it. Also, I have managed to successfully dump the electribe's current data to the PC (via the program midi-ox). Now however, I want to send a sysex file from the PC to the electribe. I've read and re-read the electribe manual and I'm sure it's okay that end- it's certainly receiving data- when I hit send on the PC the electribe's screen changes to show midi is coming in. However, about 1/8th of the way through the file, midi ox gives the following error:
"Sysex Output Devices: The Port is transmitting data to the device. Wait until the data has been transmitted, and then try again."
Now, the only output I have set in midi-ox is "midi UART" and looking at the indicator "leds" within midi-ox it's only sending the data to the electribe, but the error message suggests something else is trying to access that same midi channel?
I've checked the midi-ox help file and yahoo electribe group topics, but to no avail. I'm off to bed now, but if anyone can shed some light on this/where to look for help, please post it here and I'd be most greatful. I've spent hours and hours on this and I know it'll be something really simple/obvious to fix
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 17:11 [#01215501]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499 | Show recordbag
|
|
Cheers for any help :)
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-05-30 17:14 [#01215505]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499
|
|
"To everyone: Sorry, re-reading this thread now I've calmed down a bit"
HA HA HA!!
very good. you're quite a character, Ceri. :)
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2004-05-30 18:05 [#01215563]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
im pretty sure that usb2/firewire are far overcapable for evenmany midi signals concurrently....remember midi signals are very very low bandwidth.....
of course usb2/firewire would work....so would usb1.0
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 18:08 [#01215567]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
My midi keyboard is usb1.
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-30 18:10 [#01215570]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular
|
|
well as for latency on USB 2, it should be better than FireWire:
FireWire 400 is (surprisingly) 400Mbps
USB 2 is 480Mbps
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-30 18:12 [#01215574]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #01215570
|
|
damn, i fucked up
it's not Mbps, it's MB/sec
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2004-05-30 18:19 [#01215588]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
" Since the MIDI data transmission rate (31.5 kBaud) is different from ANY computer data rate, manufacturers had to design a MIDI interface to allow the computer to talk at MIDI's speed. "
yeah work it out
assuiming this baud rate = bit rate (not allways, often encoding means more bits per baud)
its fucking nothing
|
|
Rambling Madman
from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 18:57 [#01215646]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499
|
|
hehehe...... sorry, your right........ I am obviously backward compatible =D
|
|
avart
from nomo' on 2004-05-31 00:36 [#01215913]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker
|
|
oscillik wrote: "damn, i fucked up it's not Mbps, it's MB/sec"
No - it is Mbps. For some weird reason though, FireWire 400 is faster than USB 2 [480] anyway...
Ceri JC: Roland has "simplified midi" on their newest products like the the V-synth for instance, it connects to a computer via usb 1.
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 04:16 [#01216043]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular
|
|
not according to this it isn't
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
KADO
from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-31 06:07 [#01216143]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499
|
|
So you would like to program the drum patterns in a computer sequencer, then transmit the data into the memory of the electribe?
If you sync'ed the two, then hit play on computer sequencer as electribe starts recording, it should input the data as tho you were hitting the pads i think.
|
|
lupus yonderboy
from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-31 06:16 [#01216148]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker
|
|
i don`t see anything wrong with it as is...
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-31 10:02 [#01216416]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to lupus yonderboy: #01216148 | Show recordbag
|
|
No, but judging by your name you're probably quite old school and have grown up with it...
I think kids into abseiling/climbing who can't backsplice a frayed climbing rope (you can melt the end instead, with new ones) are missing a serious skill, but from their POV the problem is redundant and hence so is the workaround :)
|
|
avart
from nomo' on 2004-05-31 11:37 [#01216502]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker
|
|
oscillik: ok, here it goes:
MB= MegaByte Mb= Megabit (8 bits= 1 Byte)
400 Mbit/s= 50 MegaBytes/s 480 Mbit/s= 60 MegaBytes/s
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 13:20 [#01216615]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to avart: #01216502
|
|
thanks for the correction mate :)
now i'm more knowledgeable thanks to you
|
|
Messageboard index
|