Just out of interest... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
Bremzen
dariusgriffin
belb
...and 415 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Just out of interest...
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:20 [#01214912]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



...hasn't anyone ever made a standard that whilst
backwardly compatible with Midi is actually a lot more "plug
and play" to use? You know, single cable/connector for
send/recieve/thru, automatically detects channel clashes and
reassigns devices accordingly, etc?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-30 08:24 [#01214917]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



what the hell are you talking about, ceri?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:25 [#01214918]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I accept/understand by the nature of simplifying it there
would be an element of a loss of fine control for real pros
(for example, they may want several midi outs to clash), but
for your averagbe user it'd be heaven sent. Most people just
want a link between sequencers & synths and also midi
controllers to synths/sequencers.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:26 [#01214920]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01214917 | Show recordbag



I know, how stupid of me to talk about midi on an electronic
music board... I suppose I should of made a thread about
potatoes instead. It would have gotten more replies.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-30 08:27 [#01214923]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01214920



Yowch! I didn't say you were stupid, I just asked what the
hell you were talking about! Don't be so defensive!


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 08:30 [#01214925]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



I think Yamaha started doing Firewire connections. MIDI is
cool but quite dated. A new standard is definetely needed.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:32 [#01214929]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01214923 | Show recordbag



I wasn't having a go at you, merely observing that despite
there being at least 3 midi savvy people online, none of
them decided to comment, whereas dozens of people have
made/participated in nonsense threads in the past 24hrs.
This doe not include your hunt/fireside chat threads. They
are pure class.

I thought there might be some genuine reason for us still
having to use a bloody horrendous protocol like midi and
that they could shed some light on it :)

On a more serious note, if some midi guru can spare a half
an hour on AIM/MSN/SS to help me solve my midi woes, I
would be most grateful.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:33 [#01214932]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to KADO: #01214925 | Show recordbag



Yes, firewire/usb2 (not sure what the latency is like with
the latter) connections would be ideal.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-05-30 08:35 [#01214933]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



how could you use a cable as tru, in and out at the same
time?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 08:41 [#01214936]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to JAroen: #01214933 | Show recordbag



The cable wouldn't, theoretically, howver, there could be
two sets of twisted pair (with one half of a pair redundant)
all in the same outer sheath cable and there would only need
to be one connector. On devices that only had, say, midi
out, the other wires would simply not be used, although the
connection would be the same.


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 08:44 [#01214938]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



Usb and firewire can send multiple messages across the line,
and do it without picking up all the interference that midi
does. MIDI only transmits a few on off messages and needs 5
pins and a bulky interface.


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 08:46 [#01214940]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



So has anyone ever sampled a "PANIC" Loop? Those things can
scare the hell out of you.


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 09:40 [#01214975]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular



I think midi is great as it is, if a new standard was to be
introduced it would be much more of a pain in the ass for
people who own midi hardware. A simmilar problem would be
the Gate/CV interface on the old Rolands etc, which was
discontinued & now some classic bits of hardware are
suffering from having to rely on dodgy interfaces to convert
the data.
I think midi should be left alone........ maybe? =: s

....... altho, if it was done correctly it could be very
interesting. I suppose it all depends.


 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-05-30 09:56 [#01214988]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



i dont really know THAT much about midi ceri so i hope your
not pissed i didnt respond, thats assuming you presumed i
was midi savvy... which i wish i was.

i just have an evolution on a usb... does the job, however
im not quite sure what your trying to get at by your query


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-30 10:08 [#01215003]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



ive been wanting a midi merging device since forever ..


 

offline zazen on 2004-05-30 10:16 [#01215009]
Points: 184 Status: Regular



musicians seem to like old stuff like MIDI, Atari's, etc

so any new standards are unlikely to take hold easily

USB/Firewire would make a lot of sense though.

I think you can get USB keyboards for driving PC-based
samplers etc software now ...



 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2004-05-30 11:14 [#01215089]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



ceri,

probably note really on the same path but, if your using
fruityloops you should check out the dashboard. ive made
dashboards that enable me to cross synths together. its also
great for outboard gear. you simply design a dashboard to
match the schemantics of your synth.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-30 11:20 [#01215101]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



I always thought MIDI was a really bad version of a song
which sounded like it cost 1p to make :D


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 17:11 [#01215499]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Rambling Madman: #01214975 | Show recordbag



That's why it should be backwardly compatible :P

Teapot: I knew you weren't a big midi h/w interfacing chap,
I just thought you might of learnt more of it recently with
your max/msp work (max is a lot of midi, right?)

Hepburnenthorpe: I was aware of that feature, but I've not
used it yet. Thanks for the reminder though, I may well use
that for something I'm looking to buy soon...

To everyone: Sorry, re-reading this thread now I've calmed
down a bit and it I really didn't make it clear what my
technical problem was, I turned it into a general midi (no
pun intended) rant. I suppose my original question/statement
should have been:

I'm having a lot of difficulties getting an electribe to
receive Sysex data from my PC. I know the midi port of my
soundcard works okay, well, "midi in" does at least, my phat
boy midi controller works fine with it. Also, I have managed
to successfully dump the electribe's current data to the PC
(via the program midi-ox). Now however, I want to send a
sysex file from the PC to the electribe. I've read and
re-read the electribe manual and I'm sure it's okay that
end- it's certainly receiving data- when I hit send on the
PC the electribe's screen changes to show midi is coming in.
However, about 1/8th of the way through the file, midi ox
gives the following error:

"Sysex Output Devices: The Port is transmitting data to the
device. Wait until the data has been transmitted, and then
try again."

Now, the only output I have set in midi-ox is "midi UART"
and looking at the indicator "leds" within midi-ox it's only
sending the data to the electribe, but the error message
suggests something else is trying to access that same midi
channel?

I've checked the midi-ox help file and yahoo electribe group
topics, but to no avail. I'm off to bed now, but if anyone
can shed some light on this/where to look for help, please
post it here and I'd be most greatful. I've spent hours and
hours on this and I know it'll be something really
simple/obvious to fix


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-30 17:11 [#01215501]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499 | Show recordbag



Cheers for any help :)


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-05-30 17:14 [#01215505]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499



"To everyone: Sorry, re-reading this thread now I've
calmed down a bit"


HA HA HA!!

very good. you're quite a character, Ceri. :)


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2004-05-30 18:05 [#01215563]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



im pretty sure that usb2/firewire are far overcapable for
evenmany midi signals concurrently....remember midi signals
are very very low bandwidth.....
of course usb2/firewire would work....so would usb1.0


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 18:08 [#01215567]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



My midi keyboard is usb1.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-05-30 18:10 [#01215570]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



well as for latency on USB 2, it should be better than
FireWire:

FireWire 400 is (surprisingly) 400Mbps

USB 2 is 480Mbps


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-05-30 18:12 [#01215574]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #01215570



damn, i fucked up

it's not Mbps, it's MB/sec


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2004-05-30 18:19 [#01215588]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



" Since the MIDI data transmission rate (31.5 kBaud) is
different from ANY computer data rate, manufacturers had to
design a MIDI interface to allow the computer to talk at
MIDI's speed. "

yeah work it out

assuiming this baud rate = bit rate (not allways, often
encoding means more bits per baud)

its fucking nothing


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-30 18:57 [#01215646]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499



hehehe...... sorry, your right........ I am obviously
backward compatible =D


 

offline avart from nomo' on 2004-05-31 00:36 [#01215913]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker



oscillik wrote:
"damn, i fucked up
it's not Mbps, it's MB/sec"

No - it is Mbps. For some weird reason though, FireWire 400
is faster than USB 2 [480] anyway...

Ceri JC: Roland has "simplified midi" on their newest
products like the the V-synth for instance, it connects to a
computer via usb 1.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 04:16 [#01216043]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



not according to this it isn't


Attached picture

 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-31 06:07 [#01216143]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01215499



So you would like to program the drum patterns in a computer
sequencer, then transmit the data into the memory of the
electribe?

If you sync'ed the two, then hit play on computer sequencer
as electribe starts recording, it should input the data as
tho you were hitting the pads i think.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-31 06:16 [#01216148]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker



i don`t see anything wrong with it as is...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-31 10:02 [#01216416]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to lupus yonderboy: #01216148 | Show recordbag



No, but judging by your name you're probably quite old
school and have grown up with it...

I think kids into abseiling/climbing who can't backsplice a
frayed climbing rope (you can melt the end instead, with new
ones) are missing a serious skill, but from their POV the
problem is redundant and hence so is the workaround :)


 

offline avart from nomo' on 2004-05-31 11:37 [#01216502]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker



oscillik: ok, here it goes:

MB= MegaByte Mb= Megabit (8 bits= 1 Byte)

400 Mbit/s= 50 MegaBytes/s
480 Mbit/s= 60 MegaBytes/s



 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 13:20 [#01216615]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to avart: #01216502



thanks for the correction mate :)

now i'm more knowledgeable thanks to you


 


Messageboard index