You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
(nobody)
...and 365 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Religion
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-05-26 17:47 [#01209299]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01209292



having said this, there is a lot of wisdom in: "you don't
strenghten the weak by weakening the strong" (some
pop-buddhist quote i read somewhere)


I never knew Ayn Rand was a buddhist!


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-26 17:52 [#01209309]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



now you know ;)

i don't actually know how compatible that quote is with
buddhism .. mm..


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-05-26 18:01 [#01209326]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



siddhartha shrugged


 

offline goodhands team from bloomington (United States) on 2004-05-26 20:17 [#01209474]
Points: 361 Status: Regular



as kurt vonnegut recently stated:

"For some reason, the most vocal Christians among us never
mention the Beatitudes. But, often with tears in their eyes,
they demand that the Ten Commandments be posted in public
buildings. And of course that’s Moses, not Jesus. I
haven’t heard one of them demand that the Sermon on the
Mount, the Beatitudes, be posted anywhere.

“Blessed are the merciful” in a courtroom? “Blessed
are the peacemakers” in the Pentagon? Give me a break!"


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 21:09 [#01209530]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01209292



yeah youre right .. you can differentiate between a
non-religious meditator and a buddhist because the buddhist
has a belief in the four noble truths


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 21:19 [#01209554]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #01209530



however the way buddhism sees it, these truths become
apparent through discipline and meditation .. rather than
being a foundation for belief.

its true that the concepts are there anyway in teaching, but
theyre nothing more than theory until they are brought into
practise


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-26 21:38 [#01209572]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



unconcealing the truths rather than absorbing them. (?)


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 21:41 [#01209576]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01209572



yeah thats the impression im getting .. very interesting :)


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2004-05-26 21:42 [#01209579]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



So did you guys get it all sorted out yet?


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 21:46 [#01209584]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01209579



yeah this is the calmest theological discussion ive ever
seen on here :) im happy!


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-26 21:49 [#01209587]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



yeah ... i like that. at this stage though i prefer a more
confucian cosmology - but i get the feeling that
"self-mastery" (self-discovery) is still a very similar
thread in both traditions ::


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-26 21:49 [#01209588]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Theology is for mindless cretins.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 21:51 [#01209590]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #01209588



dont start :( thats only your opinion.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 21:53 [#01209591]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01209587



ive not read about confuscionism for a long time .. can you
summarise it?


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-26 22:08 [#01209601]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



haha .. shit.

well ... crudely put it is more concerned with "The Way" -
which involves practical knowledge, where this knowledge is
embodied in ones behaviour and actions (understanding
through action). The Way is the harmonious ideal - a
constellation that manages one's needs and desires. Once one
has attained the way (after years of practice) - this
becomes an end in itself - ie. The Way is desired.

RE: cosmology, there is a symmetry between wei and wu-wei (i
can't remember which is which), but wei (i think) refers to
heaven and earth - basically "nature" - e.g. the seasons.
There is a premise not to anthropomorphise nature (ie. it
doesn't rain because someone is angry) - but there are
cycles we can discover in nature, and wu-wei is the
harmonious counterpart to these cycles
["artificial/technical knowledge that isn't inherent in
nature"]. It doesn't require that everything has a cycle
that can be discovered - i.e. shit does happen - but by and
large it makes for a sustainable way of life. eg. not to
hunt animals in spring (when they've had their young) ...

The key word is "ritual order" - which basically functions
as a sign post to wu-wei ... they may appear to be
arbitrary, but they function on a very pragmatic basis. The
rules aren't "truths" as such - but they correspond to the
way. e.g. funeral ritual are the most socially significant
rites - as it recognises the powerful and potentially
dangerous emotions that loved ones experience etc.

In short, The Way aims for: intra-psychic harmony,
inter-personal (social) harmony, and above all harmony
between nature and mankind


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 22:20 [#01209613]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01209601



thats quite something .. gives me an image of a broad map of
causes and effects, one which is as you say balanced ..
straight away my mind is responding with a mandala


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-26 22:29 [#01209620]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



hehe .. well its more "necessity" than "cause&effect" -
though the cause and effect is maybe derived from the
discovered necessities? or cause and effect functions more
as an allegory? because it doesn't concern itself with a
causa sui. don't know .. having said this - the
ritual order may well take a "superstitious" form to entice
such "mindless cretins" in which case there might well be a
"causa sui" - e.g. sun?

its an elegant and beautiful "system" though - maybe too
beautiful ;)


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-26 22:40 [#01209627]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01209620



im getting a better picture now .. the means and goals are,
in a nutshell, positive karma (cause + effect) ?


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-26 22:41 [#01209629]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



yeah .. that's probably a good way to translate it


 


Messageboard index