what res do you run? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 380 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 16
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
what res do you run?
 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 03:37 [#01191519]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



me?

1024x768

used 1280X1024 for a while, but it screws with my video out
so I don't anymore..


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 03:39 [#01191520]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



1400x1050\


 

offline gnocelot from Greifswald (Germany) on 2004-05-17 03:44 [#01191525]
Points: 288 Status: Lurker



1280x1024. On a 15" monitor. People tell me that's insane,
but it works perfectly for me.


 

offline Patrick Bateman from American Gardens Buildings - W (United States) on 2004-05-17 03:44 [#01191526]
Points: 337 Status: Regular



Wow - this truly is the most interesting post ever! *snarf*


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-17 03:45 [#01191527]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



1600*1200

And I have for well over 2 years now.

I have to drop the res. on more recent games of course.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-05-17 03:50 [#01191532]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



1280X1024

works fine but sometimes theres an annoying shift in the red
and blue layers so i have to keep adjusting the balance


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 03:50 [#01191533]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



My laptop can't be more than 15", but maybe I sit closer to
it so that resolution doesn't seem small.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 03:58 [#01191541]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



when I was running 1280 it was on my 15''


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 03:59 [#01191544]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



I tried 1024x768 for a while, eheh, I felt very
claustrophobic. All the windows were smothering me
and...those EYES. They were so BIG and menacing.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-05-17 04:00 [#01191545]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



my monitor has an infinitly large resolution and so does my
digital camera so if i take a picture of the moon i can see
the individual atoms of astronaut pee the americans left
after the apollo missions


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-17 04:03 [#01191548]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Yeah 1024x768 here too.. been on that for many moons now.
Would be nice to go for more. but i dont really need
it/monitor doesnt support it.


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2004-05-17 04:39 [#01191592]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker



1600x1200 on a 19" CRT monitor


 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 04:59 [#01191615]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker



8000 x 7500 and im practically blind


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-05-17 05:13 [#01191641]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



...800x600 ;(


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 05:14 [#01191643]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sempoo: #01191641



HEATHEN.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 05:32 [#01191680]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Yo! This is my work monitor.

1280*1024 at home. I think o_O


Attached picture

 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-05-17 06:33 [#01191754]
Points: 621 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01191643



Heathen avatar ;P


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-17 06:37 [#01191758]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



1280x1024 @ work

1600x1200 @ home


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2004-05-17 06:38 [#01191760]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



i guess im the only one who runs 1280X960


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 07:03 [#01191775]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



1600 x 1200 at work, 1024 x 768 at home. Wowzers.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-17 07:09 [#01191779]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to giginger: #01191680 | Show recordbag



You utter CAD! ;)


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 07:10 [#01191781]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01191779 | Show recordbag



BAM!


 

offline azatoth233 from tku (Finland) on 2004-05-17 09:52 [#01192027]
Points: 387 Status: Regular



1280x1024 on a 21"...any smaller i wouldnt see shit...


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-05-17 09:54 [#01192032]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker



Desktop 1600X1200
Just love the workspace it gives me. 'Spesh when I'm doing
HTML, Sequencing and shit. I like to have loads of excess
space.

Games 1024X768
It's a FPS struggle on anything higher.


 

offline sons of august from the sacred cycles on 2004-05-17 09:56 [#01192037]
Points: 308 Status: Regular



600x800. otherwise i can't read whats on the screen.


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-05-17 09:57 [#01192040]
Points: 40065 Status: Regular



draft 7.30 (upgrade version)


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-05-17 09:58 [#01192042]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to sons of august: #01192037



Dont you mean 800x600?

If I couldn't run anything but 800x600, I would cry.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-17 09:59 [#01192045]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01192040



analogue bubblebath 3.1


 

offline sons of august from the sacred cycles on 2004-05-17 10:02 [#01192051]
Points: 308 Status: Regular | Followup to brokephones: #01192042



yes! no i don't have my monitor turned on its side :)


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-05-17 10:02 [#01192057]
Points: 40065 Status: Regular | Followup to princo: #01192045



this thread sucks, whats its purpose


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2004-05-17 10:06 [#01192068]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



1024*768 but nobody cares.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-05-17 10:08 [#01192082]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



1024x768. Anything else is too small for my blurry eyes.
When it comes to game playing res, well, I just don't play
them.


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-05-17 10:09 [#01192086]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01192057



"Pimpin' your resolution" is a classic geek conversation
started. I'm glad to participate.


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-05-17 10:10 [#01192088]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to brokephones: #01192086



conversation starter.

My spelling has been terrible for the last three days. I
think it goes in spurts.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-05-17 10:21 [#01192110]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



1440x900

when i use a PC i always whack it up to the maximum, and
because the PC's i get access to aren't brand spanking new
it's mainly 1280x1024


Attached picture

 

offline simone on 2004-05-17 11:48 [#01192219]
Points: 22 Status: Regular



1024x768


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 11:59 [#01192232]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01192057



I am truly honestly interested in what resolution people run
at, my computer is getting a little old and I was interested
to see what teh standard was, anything over 1024 hurts my
eyes, but it seems that there are plenty of people out there
using it, maybe I need a bigger monitor :\


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-05-17 12:01 [#01192235]
Points: 40065 Status: Regular | Followup to Refund: #01192232



yes bigger monitors always fix the problems, they cost more
but are worth it, other than thats its a personal choice/and
or need

work 21" monitor
home 19" monitor


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-05-17 12:03 [#01192242]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker



1280x1024


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-05-17 12:09 [#01192255]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



i can easily read 1280x1024 on a 14" display (or is it
1200x1024? i can't remember, but it's definitely one of
those two)

i must just have good eyes :)


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:11 [#01192257]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



my home one is a 19'' and i have problems with > 1024


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-17 12:12 [#01192260]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



My resolution is 7,680,000 x 6,144,000 on a 42,000" screen.

I rule.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:13 [#01192262]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



as well as that, I can only run the higher resolutions at
60htz refresh rate, as opposed to 80, and lets face it, 60
hurts


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-17 12:14 [#01192264]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01192262 | Show recordbag



I run at 100Hz.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:14 [#01192266]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01192260



I'll need some picture proof before I beleive that :D


 

offline PigeonSt from Detroit on 2004-05-17 12:16 [#01192269]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular



1024x768


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-17 12:24 [#01192277]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01192266 | Show recordbag



No problem


Attached picture

 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-05-17 12:28 [#01192283]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



1024x768



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-17 12:32 [#01192289]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01192283 | Show recordbag



I laugh at your shitty resolution.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:50 [#01192305]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01192277



:D

WELL FUCK ME DEAD!


 


Messageboard index