|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 03:37 [#01191519]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
me?
1024x768
used 1280X1024 for a while, but it screws with my video out so I don't anymore..
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 03:39 [#01191520]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
1400x1050\
|
|
gnocelot
from Greifswald (Germany) on 2004-05-17 03:44 [#01191525]
Points: 288 Status: Lurker
|
|
1280x1024. On a 15" monitor. People tell me that's insane, but it works perfectly for me.
|
|
Patrick Bateman
from American Gardens Buildings - W (United States) on 2004-05-17 03:44 [#01191526]
Points: 337 Status: Regular
|
|
Wow - this truly is the most interesting post ever! *snarf*
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-17 03:45 [#01191527]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
1600*1200
And I have for well over 2 years now.
I have to drop the res. on more recent games of course.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2004-05-17 03:50 [#01191532]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
1280X1024
works fine but sometimes theres an annoying shift in the red and blue layers so i have to keep adjusting the balance
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 03:50 [#01191533]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
My laptop can't be more than 15", but maybe I sit closer to it so that resolution doesn't seem small.
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 03:58 [#01191541]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
when I was running 1280 it was on my 15''
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 03:59 [#01191544]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
I tried 1024x768 for a while, eheh, I felt very claustrophobic. All the windows were smothering me and...those EYES. They were so BIG and menacing.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2004-05-17 04:00 [#01191545]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
my monitor has an infinitly large resolution and so does my digital camera so if i take a picture of the moon i can see the individual atoms of astronaut pee the americans left after the apollo missions
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-17 04:03 [#01191548]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah 1024x768 here too.. been on that for many moons now. Would be nice to go for more. but i dont really need it/monitor doesnt support it.
|
|
chambre noire
from Iceland on 2004-05-17 04:39 [#01191592]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker
|
|
1600x1200 on a 19" CRT monitor
|
|
aphextriplet
from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 04:59 [#01191615]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker
|
|
8000 x 7500 and im practically blind
|
|
Sempoo
from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-05-17 05:13 [#01191641]
Points: 621 Status: Regular
|
|
...800x600 ;(
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-17 05:14 [#01191643]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sempoo: #01191641
|
|
HEATHEN.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 05:32 [#01191680]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Yo! This is my work monitor.
1280*1024 at home. I think o_O
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Sempoo
from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-05-17 06:33 [#01191754]
Points: 621 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01191643
|
|
Heathen avatar ;P
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-05-17 06:37 [#01191758]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
1280x1024 @ work
1600x1200 @ home
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2004-05-17 06:38 [#01191760]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
i guess im the only one who runs 1280X960
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 07:03 [#01191775]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
1600 x 1200 at work, 1024 x 768 at home. Wowzers.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-17 07:09 [#01191779]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to giginger: #01191680 | Show recordbag
|
|
You utter CAD! ;)
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-17 07:10 [#01191781]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01191779 | Show recordbag
|
|
BAM!
|
|
azatoth233
from tku (Finland) on 2004-05-17 09:52 [#01192027]
Points: 387 Status: Regular
|
|
1280x1024 on a 21"...any smaller i wouldnt see shit...
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2004-05-17 09:54 [#01192032]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker
|
|
Desktop 1600X1200 Just love the workspace it gives me. 'Spesh when I'm doing HTML, Sequencing and shit. I like to have loads of excess space.
Games 1024X768 It's a FPS struggle on anything higher.
|
|
sons of august
from the sacred cycles on 2004-05-17 09:56 [#01192037]
Points: 308 Status: Regular
|
|
600x800. otherwise i can't read whats on the screen.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-05-17 09:57 [#01192040]
Points: 40065 Status: Regular
|
|
draft 7.30 (upgrade version)
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2004-05-17 09:58 [#01192042]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to sons of august: #01192037
|
|
Dont you mean 800x600?
If I couldn't run anything but 800x600, I would cry.
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-17 09:59 [#01192045]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01192040
|
|
analogue bubblebath 3.1
|
|
sons of august
from the sacred cycles on 2004-05-17 10:02 [#01192051]
Points: 308 Status: Regular | Followup to brokephones: #01192042
|
|
yes! no i don't have my monitor turned on its side :)
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-05-17 10:02 [#01192057]
Points: 40065 Status: Regular | Followup to princo: #01192045
|
|
this thread sucks, whats its purpose
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2004-05-17 10:06 [#01192068]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular
|
|
1024*768 but nobody cares.
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-05-17 10:08 [#01192082]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
1024x768. Anything else is too small for my blurry eyes. When it comes to game playing res, well, I just don't play them.
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2004-05-17 10:09 [#01192086]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01192057
|
|
"Pimpin' your resolution" is a classic geek conversation started. I'm glad to participate.
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2004-05-17 10:10 [#01192088]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to brokephones: #01192086
|
|
conversation starter.
My spelling has been terrible for the last three days. I think it goes in spurts.
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-17 10:21 [#01192110]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular
|
|
1440x900
when i use a PC i always whack it up to the maximum, and because the PC's i get access to aren't brand spanking new it's mainly 1280x1024
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
simone
on 2004-05-17 11:48 [#01192219]
Points: 22 Status: Regular
|
|
1024x768
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 11:59 [#01192232]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01192057
|
|
I am truly honestly interested in what resolution people run at, my computer is getting a little old and I was interested to see what teh standard was, anything over 1024 hurts my eyes, but it seems that there are plenty of people out there using it, maybe I need a bigger monitor :\
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-05-17 12:01 [#01192235]
Points: 40065 Status: Regular | Followup to Refund: #01192232
|
|
yes bigger monitors always fix the problems, they cost more but are worth it, other than thats its a personal choice/and or need
work 21" monitor home 19" monitor
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-17 12:03 [#01192242]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
1280x1024
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-17 12:09 [#01192255]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular
|
|
i can easily read 1280x1024 on a 14" display (or is it 1200x1024? i can't remember, but it's definitely one of those two)
i must just have good eyes :)
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:11 [#01192257]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
my home one is a 19'' and i have problems with > 1024
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-05-17 12:12 [#01192260]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
My resolution is 7,680,000 x 6,144,000 on a 42,000" screen.
I rule.
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:13 [#01192262]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
as well as that, I can only run the higher resolutions at 60htz refresh rate, as opposed to 80, and lets face it, 60 hurts
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-05-17 12:14 [#01192264]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01192262 | Show recordbag
|
|
I run at 100Hz.
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:14 [#01192266]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01192260
|
|
I'll need some picture proof before I beleive that :D
|
|
PigeonSt
from Detroit on 2004-05-17 12:16 [#01192269]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular
|
|
1024x768
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-05-17 12:24 [#01192277]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01192266 | Show recordbag
|
|
No problem
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-05-17 12:28 [#01192283]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
1024x768
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-05-17 12:32 [#01192289]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01192283 | Show recordbag
|
|
I laugh at your shitty resolution.
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-17 12:50 [#01192305]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01192277
|
|
:D
WELL FUCK ME DEAD!
|
|
Messageboard index
|