Boy raised as girl croaks | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 354 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 16
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Boy raised as girl croaks
 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-05-12 07:21 [#01184116]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Not a big shock. I remember Rollingstone had a story about
this back in '98 or so, I read about it back then.
Interesting study in gender.

Moral of the story?

LEAVE OUR FORESKIN ALONE

==========================

David Reimer, 38, Subject of the John/Joan Case, Dies
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WINNIPEG, Manitoba, May 11 ? David Reimer, a man who was
born a boy but raised as a girl in a famous medical
experiment, only to reassert his male identity in the last
20 years of his life, died on May 4. He was 38. His family
says he committed suicide.

Mr. Reimer shared his story about his life in the pages of a
book and on Oprah Winfrey's television show.

His mother, Janet Reimer, said she believed that her son
would still be alive had it not been for the devastating
experiment, which led to much emotional hardship.

"He managed to have so much courage," she said Sunday. "I
think he felt he had no options. It just kept building up
and building up."

After a botched circumcision operation when he was a
toddler, David Reimer became the subject of a study that
became known as the John/Joan case in the 60's and 70's. His
mother said she was still angry with the Baltimore doctor
who persuaded her and her husband, Ron, to give female
hormones to their son and raise him as a daughter.

As he grew up as Brenda in Winnipeg, he faced cruelty from
the other children. "They wouldn't let him use the boys'
washroom or the girls'," Ms. Reimer recalled. "He had to go
in the back alley."

His sexual reassignment was then widely reported as a
success and proof that children are not by nature feminine
or masculine but through nurture are socialized to become
girls or boys. David's identical twin brother, Brian,
offered researchers a matched control subject.

But when, as a teenager, he discovered the truth about his
past , he resumed his male identity, eventually marrying and
becoming a stepfather to three children.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-12 07:27 [#01184124]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



dang


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 07:28 [#01184127]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



what the hell?

...

did he really think he was a girl or that he was just
"special"? was he fully castrated or just circumsized?
didn't he ask questions about himself when he had those
problems in school?


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-05-12 07:28 [#01184129]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



see, that makes me angry... so the mother was mad at the
doctor for convincing them? Bullshit! She should be shot or
something...


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-05-12 07:28 [#01184130]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to uzim: #01184127 | Show recordbag



They actually constructed a VAGINA for him using skin from
other parts of his body. It wasn't, uh, well made, though.
It gave him problems throughout life.


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-05-12 07:29 [#01184131]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



!


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2004-05-12 07:31 [#01184134]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



Fucked-up story.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 07:31 [#01184137]
Points: 793 Status: Regular



It is interesting insofar as it provides a decent rebuttal
to the extreme advocates of the nurture position (a
fashionable and progressive point of view to take back in
the 70s when the John/Jean operation happened).

It's now widely recognised that the nature vs nurture
dichotomy is entirely false. It's like asking, is the area
of this shape more due to its height or its width?

It is very sad that he died. Allegedly Dr Money did some
pretty fucked up stuff in his 'therapy' for Brenda, exposing
her to explicit sexual imagery and maybe even making her
assume sexual positions with her twin brother. It's pretty
clear this can't be pegged as a gender study alone. And his
twin brother developed schizophrenia and also commit
suicide, so there may have been some underlying
psychopathology there irrespective of the gender changing
experiment.


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 07:34 [#01184139]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



another article about it (before he died)


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-12 07:36 [#01184140]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



You say that it was AFTER he found out that he was a male
(or something) that his masculinity showed itself?
Interesting.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-12 07:37 [#01184141]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



What did he/she look like.... would monoid hit it?? ;)


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 07:40 [#01184143]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



This reminds me of the Wasp Factory. Sort of.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-05-12 07:41 [#01184147]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Quoted from the Rollingstone that I still have (Keith
Richards is on the front, shirtless... scary)-

''What they did to you in the body'', John says now, ''is
not nearly as bad as what they did to you in the mind. The
psychological warfare in your head''.

''It was a pretty, lacy little dress'', Linda says. ''Joan
was ripping into it, trying to tear it off, and I thought Oh
God, she knows she's a boy''.

''On other visits to Money's office, the twins were
particularly resistant to his request that they remove their
clothes and inspect each other's genitals''.

Sad stuff.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 07:42 [#01184148]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #01184140



Marlowe: the masculinity was there all along, but repressed,
partly as a result of the aggressive therapy of Dr Money.
For example Brenda ripped off the dresses her mother gave
her, she wasn't interested in wearing them.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-05-12 07:44 [#01184151]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



No, he/she was a MAJOR tomboy, to the extreme, and there was
obviously something wrong with him. He couldn't be
reconditioned.

''In 1980, Joan had her breasts removed and a penis was
later constructed''.


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-05-12 07:44 [#01184152]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



that really makes me sick... what a sad story...


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-12 07:53 [#01184158]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to VLetr: #01184148



yeah. I didn't understand how marlowe interpreted this.

What a fucked a up story. Fucking doctors who are up to no
go should be punished just like any other people who are up
to no good. I'd rather see Bruce murdering them than
commiting suicide. It's like fucking Frankenstein and his
monster.
I do think this is a shocking (and sad) story, but it was
interesting to read.
And yes, LEAVE OUR FORESKIN ALONE.
Circumzition it's a fucked up procedure I can't believe it's
still allowed. I mean cutting of any other part of your
baby's body is not allowed (I assume) - so why should the
penis, which is a really sensitive part be destroyed that
way?
Fuck it.
Thanks for posting, Ophecks.



 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:01 [#01184171]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #01184158



I think that, at the time, the doctors probably did think
they were doing the right thing. They thought it would be
the best possible outcome for the baby, at a time when
surgical reconstruction of the child's penis would have been
impossible (surgical creation of a vaginal cleft is, by
comparison, a relatively straightforward procedure).

At the time the prevailing view was that children are
completely malleable at birth - partly a reaction against
the eugenic horrors of Nazism, which of course held that
some races were born genetically inferior.

Dr Money obviously hijacked the case to further his own
academic position though, and clearly acted less than
ethically.


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 08:03 [#01184173]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



Key_Secret > yeah maybe... but it also has a religious
meaning (well, ok that may not be an excuse, maybe more a
justification), and, according to some people, some
advantages (less risks of being contaminated by STDs)....

excision is much much worse, and is also very very
common in some parts of the world -_-


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 08:07 [#01184177]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



maybe if they could/had modified more than just the penis
and hormones, he would have been totally like a girl... with
other further body modifications, and brain modification
too... (i don't know, maybe it will be possible someday)

it wouldn't have made it any less wrong though, of course.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:10 [#01184182]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01184177



It's an interesting question isn't it though. In theory it
should be possible, of course you'd have to change the
genetic code in every cell of his body (so he had two X
chromosomes instead of an X and a Y), and also undo all the
gender specific brain development which occurs in the womb.
Rewiring neural connections... we're talking 24th century
neuroscience shit here.

And, of course, it'd be an ethical landmine.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-05-12 08:13 [#01184186]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



why feed hungty ethiopians when you can fuck with little
kids' brains?


 

offline polygonwrong from United Kingdom on 2004-05-12 08:13 [#01184187]
Points: 132 Status: Addict



That's legal?!


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 08:16 [#01184189]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



JAroen > ...yeah, and there are so much things you could
finish the sentence "why feed hungry ethiopians (or any
other hungry people) when..." with =(

this world is just fucking hopeless.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-05-12 08:21 [#01184194]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01184189



damn right

makes you want to destroy the world


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:26 [#01184201]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to JAroen: #01184186



what if fucking with little kids' brains could eliminate
mental illness? so much suffering could be spared.

not that this gender bending shit has much to do with such
an aim.


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 08:27 [#01184203]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



now... one (maybe interesting) question - what about
transexuals, people who want a sex change? why are
they uncomfortable with their own gender?

do they have a mind of sex A influencated by a body of sex B
and thus producing an ill-at-ease feeling? that would be too
simple - maybe a mind of gender B but with parts of gender
A... no, still too simple - maybe they have a mix-up between
loving something and wanting to be something... no, mustn't
be that - oh shit i don't know =P

there probably are/can be many reasons and it very probably
depends on the cases too.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-12 08:31 [#01184209]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to VLetr: #01184171



I think that, at the time, the doctors probably did
think
they were doing the right thing.


I don't think they can use that in their defense. I mean
e.g. some of the nazi-doctors who also did horrible
experiments must have believed in what they were doing.
The fact that people are so attached from nature that they
start believing more in culture (a made up [view of the]
world) is a big problem, especially in science (where things
can go REALLY wrong).
The doctors were doing the wrong thing, and so is basically
everone who circumsize poor boys.

uzim: Key_Secret > yeah maybe... but it also has
a religious meaning (well, ok that may not be an excuse,
maybe more a justification), and, according to some people,
some advantages (less risks of being contaminated by
STDs)....


I know you're not really defending the procedure here, but
there are no fucking adventages in cutting off a natural,
healthy, piece of your body.
And does it matter if it has religious meaning when most
religions are against nuditiy (so you can't show off your
thing)?
I am really sick and disgusted of the fact that it's still
going on, and again what is to blame: culture or nature?
culture of course. In the mood I am right now I am glad I am
leaving it (well, as much as I can) for 24 hours! :)


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:32 [#01184214]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01184203



Hugely complex topic, and there's really very little data on
it.

What we do know is that there are structural brain changes
PRENATALLY which correlate with showing tendencies more
typically associated with the opposite sex in later life
(eg. being attracted to your own sex). i.e. to a (pretty
limited) extent, it's possible to predict homosexuality (and
presumably transsexual urges) before birth.

Of course, a correlation is just a correlation. Not
causation.


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 08:35 [#01184222]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



JAroen > yeah. so true.

just one thing among others - our very dear ministers raised
their own salaries by 70% (yes, seventy fucking percent). if
instead of doing that, they had given this money to
starving, homeless etc. people - they could have saved some
lives.

i've read somewhere also (but this reasoning must be flawed)
that if the war industry just stopped for 6 days, it would
have been enough to feed all the starving people in the
world.

etc.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:36 [#01184224]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #01184209



Not everything nature gave you is necessary or desirable.
Various parts of the body are effectively obsolete for
modern humans... appendix, spleen, etc.


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 08:40 [#01184237]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



indeed, religion has been the cause of many wrong, and
horrible things.
and still is.

that's why i said it wasn't an excuse really...

i don't know if religions has made more good than bad or
more bad than good to the world but that's another subject,
and the current one is already complicated and interesting
enough anyway ^^


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:41 [#01184241]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01184222



Uzim: yeah, the arms industry is a ridiculous money
spinner.

30,000 people around the world die EVERY DAY of preventable
diseases (and that's a conservative estimate). i wish people
would put the terrorist threat a little more in
perspective.

A coronary heart disease producing cheeseburger is of more
danger to your average american than all the terrorists in
the world. But it's not a headline for the evening news is
it?


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-12 08:44 [#01184244]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to VLetr: #01184224



The appendix is not obsolete... And doesn't the simple fact
that it works (it does not rotten by itself) prove that it
is useful?
I mean organs and muscles that aren't used they just sortof
"decay", don't they?

Also, the removal of the foreskin makes you loose atleast
1/3 of the feeling in your penis... that plain fact makes
removing it a really stupid decision (if you intend to ever
have sex, or even masturbate for that matter).


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:44 [#01184245]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01184222



also, most starvation isn't because there's not enough food,
it's because the food is not distributed in a fair manner.
corruption, war and cash crop exportation to the developed
nations all deprive the third world poor of food. if it was
distributed on the basis of need rather than economics and
conflict, there would be an awful lot less starvation.

fairly obvious but it always bears repetition.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-12 08:46 [#01184247]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #01184244



The appendix is obsolete. It works in that it receives a
blood supply which keeps it alive and prevents it from
'rotting', but it serves no useful function to the body.

It's like having a third nipple. Does no harm, doesn't fall
off, but doesn't do jack shit.

Actually all of your nipples, if you're a man.

Hmm. *thinks about ladynips*


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-12 08:46 [#01184249]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to VLetr: #01184245



the plain fact that humans starve today shows how
unsuccessful the culture/society of today is. And not just
for the fact that it's capitalistic.


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2004-05-12 09:25 [#01184291]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



If the world were a movie, it'd be Lord of the Flies


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-05-12 09:29 [#01184295]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mertens: #01184291



the world is just so wrong. i hate it! why can't people just
be kind to each other. a pensioner raped for 20p. gangs of
two year olds roaming the streets. governments lining up
babies against the wall and pissing on them. multinational
corporations poisoning our seas. it's just so wrong!


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-05-12 09:29 [#01184297]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i thought that this ment like"boy raised while girl croaks"


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-12 09:59 [#01184369]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



Well, to make omelettes, you have to break eggs.


 

offline uzim on 2004-05-12 10:27 [#01184406]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



marlowe > but would you like to be an "egg"?


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-05-12 12:29 [#01184604]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #01184406



Don't we all?


 


Messageboard index