| 
          | 
        
        
         | 
                     
	  |           
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 04:37 [#01178137]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
 After three and a half years of dwelling on the subject and  extensive calculating, I have finally found the biggest  number in the entire universe: 
 
  twelve
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           J198
             from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2004-05-08 04:43 [#01178143]
         Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
please dont bother explaining. mathematics scare me.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           nacmat
             on 2004-05-08 04:46 [#01178144]
         Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
twelve is a very used number in many religions, beliefs,  cultures...
 
  12 months 12 apostols 12 zodiac constelations 12 jewish tribes (sons of abraham) 12 ...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-05-08 04:50 [#01178147]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
64 is the most common appearing number anywhere,
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 04:51 [#01178148]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Really though, I think I have found the theoretically  biggest possible number in the universe. The mistake is  thinking that you can go: 1,000,000,000,00... to infinite.  Well numbers have to be stored somehow. So, assume that,  say, an atom is the smallest unit in the universe capable of  storing a number... then the largest stored number in the  universe is limited by the number of atoms in the universe  capable of storing it.
 
  This number is just a stored symbol though. The largest  unstored number must be much much larger, though still  limited by the universe's size. For example, for our  purposes, assume that atoms are the smallest units in the  universe. Then the number of every possible combination of  atoms with every other possible combination must be the  largest possible number. Then put that number as it's own  exponent and repeat this operation per every unit of the  smallest possible time. Or something. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 04:53 [#01178150]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
sixhundredtrillionbillion is bigger
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 04:55 [#01178155]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01178150
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
WWhoa... jesus christ...  you blew my mind...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 04:56 [#01178158]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01178150
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Three and a half years... wasted... wasted...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           giginger
             from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 04:57 [#01178160]
         Points: 26335 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
the biggest number is below:
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 04:59 [#01178164]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178158
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
sorry man. i guess i'm a mathmetical genius or sumtin' ?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 04:59 [#01178165]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #01178160
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
WHERE!? WHEERRE? LOL! I DONUT SEE IT! ;)
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           nacmat
             on 2004-05-08 04:59 [#01178166]
         Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
what is a number?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 05:03 [#01178170]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01178166
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
that's too deep...a.rggh BRAIN overloading
  a number is a thing to like..count things, so that we can do  things with it like..uhm estimate how many times cows take a  dump each year, you know stuff like that. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:06 [#01178175]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01178166
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Indeed, it's trickier than it seems to fully understand  them. Letters just seem combinational, for example "g" is  just one possibility out of 26 other choices. Then the brain  does it's magic to convert those symbols to meaning. But  numbers are more logical somehow because logical  mathematical operations like addition can be applied to them  with repeatability and predictably. But to do addition you  perhaps need symmetry. You can add one jar of peanut butter  to one jar of peanut butter and group and count the  molecules because they're all similar, but can you easily  add one jar of peanut butter to one loaf of bread? Yes. Yes  you can, and the result is a peanutbutter sandwich... one of  which I will go and make... right... now...!!!!!11111 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           nacmat
             on 2004-05-08 05:07 [#01178178]
         Points: 31275 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01178170
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
but a word has a meaning by itself... is like the smallest  meaningfull unit
 
  but a number? what is a number alone, by itself?
  nothing
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 05:07 [#01178180]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178175
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
you really have to know mathematics well to make a  peanutbutter sandwich 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 05:09 [#01178182]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01178178
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"what is a number alone, by itself?"
  that's easy. it's 1
  1 is alone, it's the loneliest number. it doesn't have any  other number added to it. that's an analogy for my life,  really! 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:16 [#01178194]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Lyrics by Group X, arabian rap sensations:
  "If you want to sex me you have to be good at math,..."
  ah ha ha ha ha ha...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 05:19 [#01178199]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178194
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
lol
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Doomed Puppy
             from on and off and on and off and on 2004-05-08 05:24 [#01178206]
         Points: 1818 Status: Addict
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
My telephone number is the way for underage girls to my  basement. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           gnocelot
             from Greifswald (Germany) on 2004-05-08 05:24 [#01178207]
         Points: 288 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178175
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Wouldn't that be a peanut butter and glass sandwich? You'll  have to be very careful preparing and eating that, or you  might end up getting hurt. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           nacmat
             on 2004-05-08 05:25 [#01178210]
         Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
math is not about numbers
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Key_Secret
             from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-08 05:27 [#01178212]
         Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #01178210
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
numbers are symbols, just like words.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:28 [#01178213]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to gnocelot: #01178207
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Oh my! I must have accidently done subtraction somewhere.  Luckily I remembered I made pop tarts instead this time. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           nacmat
             on 2004-05-08 05:30 [#01178222]
         Points: 31275 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #01178212
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
numbers are places
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:32 [#01178225]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Numbers can only represent ammounts in time or space. Is  there any other possible thing they can stand for? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 05:32 [#01178226]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
numbers is a kraftwerk song
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Doomed Puppy
             from on and off and on and off and on 2004-05-08 05:33 [#01178230]
         Points: 1818 Status: Addict
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
People are numbers
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Key_Secret
             from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-08 05:34 [#01178234]
         Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #01178225
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
have't you seen Aronofsky's "pi"? hm... maybe you saw it just before creating this topic?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Doomed Puppy
             from on and off and on and off and on 2004-05-08 05:34 [#01178235]
         Points: 1818 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #01178225
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Time and space are only four dimensions. I bet there are  more.... 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:40 [#01178244]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #01178234
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I thought that movie sucked.
  Okay, then what is a "dimension".
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           nacmat
             on 2004-05-08 05:41 [#01178247]
         Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
and why are there only ten numbers?
  (considering 0 a number)
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Key_Secret
             from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-08 05:43 [#01178252]
         Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #01178247
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
that's just the system... and it's not very good. Because it's like after six or seven that humans start to  think of them as "a lot of things".
  I mean, e.g. when counting:
  six sticks is six sticks. but nine sticks are several sticks.
  just when looking at them quickly. So we should have used  another base than 10 for the system, that'd make things  easier. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:44 [#01178253]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01178247
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Look up "ten fingers" plus "binary" plus "decimal" in google  and you'll likely find out. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           AlbertoBalsalm
             from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-05-08 05:45 [#01178256]
         Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178253
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
and octal
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Doomed Puppy
             from on and off and on and off and on 2004-05-08 05:46 [#01178258]
         Points: 1818 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #01178244
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
The only way for an ignorant slob like me to define a  dimension is through the already existing dimensions.  Existing is ofcourse what the limited capabilities of the  human mind can percieve. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:48 [#01178262]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #01178252
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
base 10 was historically convenient because we had 10  fingers, but now we're stuck with it because evolution  usually only makes minor changes of already existing things.  there's a lot of dividing in half of numbers, for example  when measuring to hang up a shelf or something and you want  to place 4 equally spaced screws... well 10 divides into 5  then 2.5 then 1.25 then 0.625 which gets awkward. Base 16  divides in half very nicely obviously. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           gnocelot
             from Greifswald (Germany) on 2004-05-08 05:50 [#01178266]
         Points: 288 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178244
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
The dimension of a vector space is the maximum cardinality  of all sets of linearly independent vectors. Alternatively,  if you have a fixed orthonormal base of the space, I guess  the direction of each element of that base can be called a  "dimension" in the colloquial sense.
 
  We use a base-10 system because most people in the past  couldn't count without using their fingers, much less spend  time pondering which base might be the best. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           hobbes
             from age on 2004-05-08 05:51 [#01178269]
         Points: 8168 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
1>12=2  apparently
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 05:56 [#01178275]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
In this nice old worn simple dictionary I have,
  dimension: 1. a measurement of something in length, width,  or height [The dimensions of the box are 40 inches in  length, 30 inches in height, and 24 inches in width.] 2.  size or importance [a project of vast dimensions].
 
  So possibly the word has evolved to take in a sort of  paranormal meaning (ren and stimpy travel to the dimension  where all the missing left socks in the universe are), but  like bigfoot maybe it has no reality. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 06:02 [#01178281]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01178275
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
well, I mean no reality other than the time and space ones.
  That definition was pretty prickly... I interpreted it as,  say there's a 2-d plane, the dimension equals all the points  in that plane extending in all directions. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Key_Secret
             from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-08 06:02 [#01178284]
         Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #01178252
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
ok wmw... btw I think it's like 4 or 5 things that we can see as four  or five things, instead of just 'a bunch of things'. (not 6  or seven like I wrote in the post I am replying to).
 
  You all understand what I mean?
  Using 4 would be a good thing then.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Doomed Puppy
             from on and off and on and off and on 2004-05-08 06:03 [#01178285]
         Points: 1818 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #01178275
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Humans are only trying to find familiar patterns in  everything. They use limited meanings and concepts to define  uknown things. The definition you gave is limited. Time is  supposed to be a dimension but what the fuck is time?  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Key_Secret
             from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-08 06:05 [#01178289]
         Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Doomed Puppy: #01178285
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
make this another 'time does not exist'-topic!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 06:08 [#01178298]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to Doomed Puppy: #01178285
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
good point...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           gnocelot
             from Greifswald (Germany) on 2004-05-08 06:12 [#01178306]
         Points: 288 Status: Lurker | Followup to Doomed Puppy: #01178285
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Time's like a long, wide river: if you try to swim, you  might end up getting killed by a ship. And vampires can't  cross it. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 06:16 [#01178312]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker | Followup to gnocelot: #01178306
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I love your avatar. I want to either make the entire thing  repeat the process in a fractalish way, or make scratch  noises with it (going forward would make a "scratch" noise  and reverse would make a "scritch" noise). 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Doomed Puppy
             from on and off and on and off and on 2004-05-08 06:19 [#01178315]
         Points: 1818 Status: Addict
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I've got a better one: How is the perception of time altered for one when:
  i)One is frying ones hand in cooking oil ii)One has sex with a hot chick he likes iii)One has sex with her 10 year old daughter while frying  her hand in mcdonalds vegetable oil. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           w M w
             from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 06:26 [#01178324]
         Points: 21639 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Oh... damn, I fried my face instead of my hand on accident.  This data will be useless, i'll have to restart. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           warpphex
             from lurkston, ziltyland. (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-08 06:40 [#01178333]
         Points: 1372 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Im just going to stitch my nut sack to my eye lid ,ill be  back in a mo ...  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
         
         
Messageboard index 
              
        
 
	 
	  |