time doesn't exist | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 272 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614093
Today 6
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
time doesn't exist
 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 19:48 [#01171867]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



i remember reading an interesting article in the national
paper about this. it's obvious that time does not exist as
it has been created by man for our convenience, based on
solar cycles etc. so the article made the point that that
means our lives are non-linear and thus explaining deja vu -
which is merely a reminder of our possible path. see also:
donnie darko.
i fink it was an extract from a buck.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2004-05-03 19:53 [#01171871]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



man's of time doesn't exist, time still exists. same with
measures of distance, pressure, temperature, etc. its all
relative to something else, thus having no real value. but
the stuff still exists. just because a meter is a made up
distance doesnt mean that there is no distance between me
and say.... my computer.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 19:55 [#01171873]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



doesnt it?


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-05-03 19:56 [#01171874]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



booooooo


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:04 [#01171878]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



define existing


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-03 20:08 [#01171883]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"time doesn't exist"
In general, it does not.

I looked at my hands tonight after a year of not looking at
them from above (I was looking only at palms). Man, I
started forming adult hands so freaking fast!

Now, I cannot say that time does not exist either. Things
change with it.

Maybe it exists only when the portion of universe is taken
into connsideration instead of the whole universe itself.

I am just too inignificant to know the truth anyway....


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:09 [#01171886]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #01171871



you're contradicting yourself.. if there is no man made
distance.. then there is NO distance between you and your
computor.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 20:12 [#01171890]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



time, distance anything man made or so called by us.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2004-05-03 20:13 [#01171891]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



no, theres still distance, as in the fact that the atoms in
my body are not in contact with some other body, and that
some fixed amount of atoms could possibly fit inbetween.
the idea of a meter and that "this is 4 meters 2 cm apart"
is an invention of man


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 20:15 [#01171892]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



i agree btw


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:18 [#01171895]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #01171891



so you think.. because man put labels on what he 'sees'


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-03 20:18 [#01171896]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular



Deadlines are the worst. I could do without them.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-03 20:19 [#01171897]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



haha exaph you sould like my friends after a spliff


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:19 [#01171898]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



atoms is an invention of man as well


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-05-03 20:20 [#01171899]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



this thread doesn't exist.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:20 [#01171900]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



the idea of atoms.. is the same as the idea of distance..


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-03 20:20 [#01171902]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01171900



yeah


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:21 [#01171903]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



everything we know are ideas of man.. we cannot possibly go
beyond what we know.. even the idea of something beyond what
we know an idea.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-05-03 20:21 [#01171904]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01171898



so you're saying a closter of electrons protons and neutrons
is something that exists only in the imagination of
scientists?


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:21 [#01171906]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to kochlear: #01171904



no. i said , it's an idea of man.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:22 [#01171908]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to kochlear: #01171904



everything we know, are just ideas we've created.. and the
masses follow and believe in it, therefor it exists.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-05-03 20:23 [#01171911]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



or maybe you're in a lucid dream state and we are all
characters YOU created in YOUR world, and thus you've
created all the ideas.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:24 [#01171912]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



we're all isolated to our own minds, sight, beliefs.. we
cannot go beyond our limitations of our brains. if in fact
there are limitations.. but the theory of limitations is an
idea we created.. see how we're stuck in this loop of our
brains?


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:25 [#01171916]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to kochlear: #01171911



perhaps.. but even that is just a human idea. so it's not
any more relevant then the current idea of existance.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2004-05-03 20:33 [#01171939]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



atoms do exists, a meter doesnt. there really ARE things
with neutrons and protons in the center with a bunch of lil
electrons swirling around em. but a meter? nope, there is no
actual defenition for that.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-05-03 20:34 [#01171941]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Lost... in time...

Like... tears..in... rain..

time to die!


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:34 [#01171942]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #01171939



well there has to be space in order for a meter to exist..
and space is an 'actual thing', right? just like an atom.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-05-03 20:35 [#01171946]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



numbers also don't exist

same as words


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:36 [#01171951]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to roygbivcore: #01171946



what about people who are born blind? do lesser things exist
to them?



 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-05-03 20:37 [#01171953]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



such as sparkles?


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:38 [#01171957]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



existensialism... go study it.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-05-03 20:39 [#01171960]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



why did you ask me about blind people though


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:40 [#01171961]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to roygbivcore: #01171960



cause you started listing things that 'don't exist' , as
though you or anyone has any clue about existance.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-05-03 20:41 [#01171963]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01171942



but you're not saying "this is a meter long piece of air"
therefore hedphukker wins.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-03 20:41 [#01171964]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



this thread is so booooooring

its so grade 8


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:42 [#01171966]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to kochlear: #01171963



why not? how is that different from labeling an atom?


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-05-03 20:42 [#01171968]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



uh

i was just saying that along with time there are a lot of
man made ideas which aren't real

you can not find 3 in nature. you can find 3 of an object
but you will never find straight up 3.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-03 20:43 [#01171969]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to roygbivcore: #01171946



this discussion is getting kinda pointless.
Words and numbers are signs that represent things. I don't
know about you, but I am aware of their existence.
They aren't tangible, but they represent something.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-05-03 20:45 [#01171975]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to roygbivcore: #01171968



so everything 'solid' in 'nature' exists? what about the
insects you've never heard of.. or the 99% of the coean
floor we have never explored?


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-03 20:46 [#01171979]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



the only thing that exists to YOU is what youve seen and
heard.

NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-03 20:49 [#01171981]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



i cant beleive your arguing over perception.
i mean, there are trillions of perceptions.
each and everyone of them are right too, know why?

because... they exist

BOO


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 20:56 [#01171992]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Time doesn't exist in the linear fashion we percieve it -
That's just brought about by the way we deal with memories
in middle dimensions (not being all sci-fi saying middle
dimensions - just in between the very large and the very
small).

Atoms don't really exist as little balls floating in a
vacuous space - That is a VERY old idea - Long been
superceeded (sure that't not spelt right).

Matter itself is just a manifestation of energy - Energy
pockets that exist in 26 dimensional (7 to some, 11 to some,
depending on which theory) hyperspace, according to
M-Theory, the updated string theory.

Cause and effect is how we're used to dealing with things,
but it's not what the universe runs on - It's just a
simplified way of explaining certain manifestations in this
particular scale of everyday existance.

Every point in space/time does actually reference each other
-In a sense every point in time and space is totally
interconnected at all times...

And some fringe scientists have attempted to link that to
collective consiousness (/God), precognitive thought, remote
viewing, premenitions, ghosts, past life
experience(/memories - afterall, memories are the only thing
that connect us to who we are - if we shared memories we'd
all realise we were the same person), etc...

And yeah, it could well be the case - But I think deja vu is
when a short-term memory is stored in the wrong place
basically, making you feel like it was an old memory you've
just relived... It's quite a common occurance in people with
brain tumours - Although, I've definetly had some deja vu's
which don't quite fit that mould.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-03 21:08 [#01172006]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



"Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience
death. If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal
duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to
those who live in the present." - Wittgenstein, in the
Tractatus


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-03 21:16 [#01172009]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



when we die, we go back to the place we were before we were
born. nowhere.

i cant beleive some ppl think just because they have a
consciounce that their gonna live forever

how egotistical is that!


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-03 21:17 [#01172010]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01172009



All living things are more or less concious.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-03 21:18 [#01172011]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #01172010



yes i know


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 22:32 [#01172041]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



If you were born from nowhere once, why not twice?


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-03 22:36 [#01172043]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Then how can you say you're 'you' if 'this life' is
essentially nothing. Like, 'Oh, I used to be Shakespeare,
but I am re-born now as me.' Same deal. Doesn't make
sense.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2004-05-03 22:45 [#01172050]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Well this discussion is impossible without being able to
quantify or define the "self".

To me, I see the individual self as a concept created by a
small part of the brain - Memories and your sensory organs
give you a sense of place and being, and linear
continuarity.

Ultimately all I believe in is a single energy and
consiousness.

Everything else is just manifestations of this energy and
order involved in a cosmic dance.

But that's just me - Certainly, whether I come from a
spiritual or a scientific perspective, I always end up at
the same conclusion these days..

And I see death as a liberating experience, rather than a
termination of a certain "arrangement" of energy.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-03 22:49 [#01172054]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



The self doesn't exist as much as time doesn't exist. It's
just a quantified measurement (inches, meters); "All the
matter in this space is "YOU""



 


Messageboard index