honest question | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
Roger Wilco
...and 522 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614206
Today 10
Topics 127548
  
 
Messageboard index
honest question
 

offline wimp on 2004-04-24 19:02 [#01159432]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Haha!


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:03 [#01159433]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #01159426



It seems to be an (un)fortunate fact of human existence that
you always need things, real or imagined. period. Also,
once you have something, it's hard to move away from in
(physical addictions (chemicals, sex, etc.) are real killers
in this regard). Many people accept this and live happy
lives as a result. I hate this fact.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:03 [#01159435]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #01159426



i dont think comparing drug taking to physical activity is
valid.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-04-24 19:04 [#01159439]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



i agree with you sneakattack that one should be able to
enjoy life without the help of a chemical (unless you're
very ill). in fact thats something a lot of drug users cant
cope with. i'm not against drugs at all though.
also i see great differences between certain drugs.



 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:05 [#01159440]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01159431



haha, the cute cherub imbibing in your avatar isn't you
already drinking?

yeah I plan on subliming into the life of a happy ghost,
buoyed up on a cushion of.. never mind.

wimp: one of my two closest friends, who happens to be
concert pianist (you'll see why I'm bringing this up) loves
eminem. I respect people who are so open tremendously.
Anyway, I'll suggest to him that he buys it, and listen to
it =)


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:06 [#01159441]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #01159435



why not? whatever you do, you have your brain ultimately
filtering and processing the activity. everything in life
is perceived--we don't have a direct plug into reality at
all.

and I mean, if drugs are 'bad', are dreams 'bad'? I
absolutely _love_ dreams. are they real? no.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:08 [#01159442]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01159441



ok heres my personal example

i exercise a lot. i feel the need to. but thats because i
want to live a long life, its not done for escapist
purposes.


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:08 [#01159444]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01159439



yeah I bet there's a world of variety (not meant to be a
pun, oh well). It's also hard to get off addictions, which
makes those things scary. For instance I smoked cigarettes
heavily a few months this semester, and though I quit really
lust after them.. whatever. And yeah I'm bringing this up
to point out internal contradictions.


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:08 [#01159446]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #01159442



escaping death


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-04-24 19:09 [#01159449]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



drugs are nice


 

offline wimp on 2004-04-24 19:09 [#01159450]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Well, there is a pinnacle in exercise when endorphines are
released. My father feels like he has to exercise every
morning now.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:12 [#01159455]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01159446



i hope youre just trying to be clever when you say that :)


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-04-24 19:14 [#01159457]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



yeah sneakattack , i quit cigarettes after 12 years!
i'm a well happy bunny about that.

i still come across the"5 leaves left" notice once in a
while though ;)


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-24 19:14 [#01159458]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



if you bring it into more conceptual territory, it's really
difficult to say just what is a drug and what isn't...
because in order to answer that question we'd have to have a
much more clear idea of just where one's identity ends and
the material world begins... let's say that drugs are
defined as a material substance that you consume that alters
your perception... well eating apples alters your perception
(gives you energy, a concept of what apples taste like, how
other tastes differ, etc.)... where do you draw the line...
is it fair to draw it anywhere?


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:14 [#01159460]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #01159442



i also meditate daily. it is a totally natural means of
relaxation.

everything that most people need is in the nature of their
own minds, to be trained and utilised

lasting happiness comes from the discipline of the body and
mind. synthetic means will only ever be temporary


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-04-24 19:15 [#01159461]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Well, we're told that we supposedly have this 70% of the
brain that is unused. I figure that section is for
destroying with drugs. So as long as I'm sober 30% of the
time I should be fine.


 

offline wimp on 2004-04-24 19:16 [#01159463]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Please read this.

Not being clever.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-04-24 19:16 [#01159464]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



PCP FOR EVERYONE!!!!!!

*passes out the angel dust to everyone on xlt*

this is not an option nigga! if you do not smoke this we
have a problem.


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:19 [#01159468]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to roygbivcore: #01159449



rockenjohnny: sorry for the bad quip, annoyingly enough any
argument can be batted around endlessly.. sorry =) .. and
about your second post, I be exercize helps a shitload too;
I need more.

hobbes: heh, I hope I'm happy about it some point. It's
been over a month, and I didn't smoke very long at all, and
still want them each time I go outside!!

deadeight: yeah I said something like that earlier.. but I
think "what can severely hurt me" is as decent a line to
draw as any.

pomme hehe with my luck I'd probably eradicate the 30% which
is used, and the rest would sit around, blissfully unharmed
and lazy


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:20 [#01159472]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #01159463



Yeah that's something really weird; it always bothers me how
much I enjoy simple physical activies.


 

offline wimp on 2004-04-24 19:22 [#01159475]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Well, it's a "natural high on life". But my dad just feels
like he has to exercise at the gym every morning now. It's
gotten to the point where he feels down on the days he
doesn't work out.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:22 [#01159477]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #01159463



exactly - exercise itself is not a drug. it promotes natural
processes within the body.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-04-24 19:23 [#01159478]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to wimp: #01159463 | Show recordbag



brightest page on the net. hands down.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:24 [#01159483]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01159468



thats alright, i meant to attach a smiley to the end of that
post :)


 

offline wimp on 2004-04-24 19:26 [#01159484]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



I was talking about addiction, albeit to drugs, exercise,
masturbating.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-04-24 19:30 [#01159489]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



sneakattack dont even go there anymore, stop now or it will
get harder!!

cigs are defenitely part of the "drugs" i would highly not
recommend. appart from the damage it does to the obvious
places in our body, we have to submit to the lies of the
terrifying tobacco industry and make them bigger and bigger,
i hate them.

if you are afraid of the damage that can be caused through
drug intake, might aswell try one that has a bit of an
effect. or maybe just stick to not taking any at all. :)

oh! but you dont smoke anymore, good. at least you can
compare "that" one to "reality".




 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:33 [#01159496]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01159489



Well since I don't use many chemicals (I even abstain
medicines), especially when I started I could feel their
effect quite strongly.. and if they're hitting my brain,
it's possible they're doing something bad.

it's sucky though, no matter what we're always avoiding some
addictions. Sad how easily humans are led astray. I've
always got something awful I'm throwing lots of energy away
on.. and it's impossible to 100% predict which evils are
worse. Like I said though, hurting the brain is crossing
the line.. damn I'm repetetive


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 19:34 [#01159497]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



just for good measure LAZY_TITLELAZY_TITLE thanks
for the good info guys much appreciated


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-24 19:38 [#01159505]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #01159484



its an interesting thought. i could say that i feel
displeased when i dont get out and exercise. but im stubborn
about it not being an addiction. to me it feels more like a
routine that i have dedicated myself to, and that id be
letting myself down if i got lazy.

also as your document suggests, the endorphins released in
exercise are there to combat the pain associated with the
workout.
although running for ages makes me feel great, it doesnt
make me feel unnaturally happy. i think theres a parallel
there between our information


 

offline wimp on 2004-04-24 19:49 [#01159520]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



I agree. This is mostly a personal issue (about my father
exercising).

My point to SneakAttack was that physical harm aside, drugs
have a tendency to become addicting (some due to
chemical-dependency inhibitors). The reason for this is that
life is filled with suffering and such, and certain
substances and activities act as a distraction from that
suffering-reality. This distraction is highly appealing, and
many people get drawn into that reality-escaping behavior,
often becoming dependent.

Ultimately, life contains suffering, and to ignore or
distract yourself from said suffering is to ignore life.
We're all here (for whatever reason you wish to believe)
living. It doesn't make sense to me to spend your waking,
living hours escaping from life, especially by taking drugs.
Don't even get me started on Afterlifers (poly and
monotheists) who spend their entire lives waiting for some
superficial "afterlife". Bah to nonesense. Bah to spending
money on things that make the world less real.


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2004-04-24 20:44 [#01159534]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01159362



jesus christ- i'm sure it's already all been said, but
regardless i feel the need to put it in my own words

1 some people are always addicted to something- i went out
with an N.A. girl once, and all her former addict friends
had sattelite dishes, espresso machines, and a library of
pornography that would make marlowe blush
i'm not sure WHY they need these things (or why they needed
coke to beging with) to make their lives complete, but they
certainly seem to think they're neccessary to their
wellbeing

2 people are always pushing instant gratification- it's just
a really good seller-, go ahead turn on the t.v., it might
take you a minute of flipping around, but you WILL find
something on there to make you smile,

3 there's always someone with some random statistic which
generalizes what should really be a much more in depth
survey, to prove that whatever is good/bad for you and
should/shouldn't be done regularly

i guess the bottom line is not posting stupid messages on
boards like this
if you think that 'drugs' can cause lasting physical harm i
suggest you look into all the things that aren't 'drugs'
that are often worse for you, which our governments allow to
be distributed to the populace on a regular basis
if you don't know what i'm talking about, i'm sure someone
here will break it down for you
as for me
i'm going to go smoke some pot
and it HAS caused me lasting damage,
the damage being i keep feeling the need to respond to
useless arbitrary oppinionated threads to defend my
addiction in comparison to seriously dangerous habbits, like
television, fast food, or the educational system which we
now endorse

bye!


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-24 20:50 [#01159536]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to diemax: #01159534



[I tried very hard to not be ideological. Like I said
(typoed) earlier, it'd be ludicrous to structure an attack
of this form on the community, given that (a) I like it here
and (b) what the minority/majority is. I was just asking.
I made it quite clear that I have many
arbitrary/contradictory aspects (as does everyone). read
before you flame]


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-04-24 21:20 [#01159545]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i prefer not to think of the possible damage...there's
plenty of things i should start doing different, to stay in
perfect condition...but then again, some pot can't hurt that
much, and it helps lower my nervousnes and stress quite a
bit!


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-04-24 21:27 [#01159554]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I agree with sneakattack here, mainly. Though I don't care
either way, not enough to make a topic about it and not
enough to read everything that's been typed... 80 some odd
posts, too much for a subject I'm just completely
indifferent to by this point.

I don't do drugs, but not really because of the health risks
or any beef against them... I just don't don't want to spend
money or time doing them, I'm constantly busy doing some
silly stupid thing and I don't think it would help me to be
''altered'' in any way during said silly stupid things. I
need to be sober minded at all times. Plus I have an
addictive personality and smoking pot would quickly lead to
LSD and then heroin and then bone marrow or something.

I don't smoke or drink or anything, no reason to. But by all
means, go get smashed, I don't think any of less of people
that do. I'd think less of me if did, though. That may or
may not be deep.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-04-24 21:29 [#01159556]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



drugs have FUCKED MY LIFE UP PERMANENTLY



 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-04-24 21:30 [#01159557]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01159556



but ohhh golly they sure are good

yessah!


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-04-24 21:30 [#01159558]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



when i got into drugs, i was soo young and naive to really
know and be aware of how damaging drugs are to you. i
quickly learnt though.. and im straight edge now and
extremely paranoid of brain damage from everything.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-25 02:19 [#01159647]
Points: 24591 Status: Lurker



Drugs are not good or bad.

If someone abuses a drug, then it is the abuse that is
"bad". If someone's mental framework goes badly with a drug,
then it is unfortunate, but we live and learn by experince.
If someone takes a drug without proper knowledge of it,
where there is some, like "drink water when taking E, but
don't take too much", and then die of either a
Dehydration-related collapse, or, as has happened after
Governmental-induced paranoia about this, from drinking too
much water, then that is unfortunate. Don't blame the drugs.


 

offline OK on 2004-04-25 02:35 [#01159649]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



hurting the brain? are you 12?

do you go out on the streets with a helmet on becuase
there's the same risk of hurting your brain by not doing
that as smoking pot.

don't you know anyone who uses drugs? do you really notice
any brain damage on them?

some times it's wise to not believe everything your mom
tells you


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2004-04-25 03:50 [#01159663]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01159362



I don't. I've worked in the psychiatry, and seen a lot of
young guys ending there because of drug-use.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-25 04:02 [#01159667]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to mortsto-x: #01159663 | Show recordbag



Yes, it is odd how the pro-drug camp neatly sweep that fact
under the carpet...

Sure you can get brain damaged through head injuries in a
car crash or from a fall, but why add another possible (and
unneccasary) cause to the list?

The analogy made to alcohol is an often used and extremly
weak one. Certainly, "proper alcoholics" are just as messed
up as full blown heroin addicts. However, what percentage of
people who drink on a regular basis ever become real
alcoholics? 2 or 3% tops. Compare that to people who use
hard drugs regularly. How many regular, recreational crack
users go on to become full blown addicts (even if they later
manage to kick the habit)? A lot more than 2 or 3%...

You can argue that some people are self destructive and will
always find ways of screwing themselves up. That's certainly
true of some people, but all drug users? For a lot of them,
it's their lust for life and wanting to see what things are
like that makes them try drugs in the first place. I've
known a few bright, pleasant people who've become utter
arseholes and pissed their life away through substance abuse
and in one case, died because of it.


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2004-04-25 04:04 [#01159671]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



And the effects of alcohol is well-known. The effects of all
the new drugs in the market are not.


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-25 04:06 [#01159672]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



tolstoyed: yeah I definitely know what you mean, a few times
here I mentioned that I'm kinda a wreck, so my ideology
clearly isn't so successful.

ophecks: problem is that even though I don't judge people
for not following my ideas, they often think I may.. oh
well, so it is. But yeah the money part is silly as well.

corrupted-girl: thanks for the comments, will keep in mind,
good luck in the future and good job getting clean

marlowe: definitely different people react differently, and
in an earlier post I commented that for some (maybe myself,
I wouldn't know) the physical/chemical damage is greatly
offset by the psychological boon (that's obvious, sorry that
I'm being so boring).

OK: hi, yes I should wear a helmet, the world is a mess.
Um, why don't you read the thread some before saying silly
comments? Also, I like your assumptions about me. I have
had someone quite close to me get totally demolished by them
(he can't remember something which was discussed _in_depth_
15 minutes prior--and I know quite well how he used to be),
as well as lots of friends lose motivation, energy, ability,
focus, etc. But that's not why I'm posting. I was posting
to ask questions, because I like this forum, and trust
people's responses here. I expected many people to think I
was being a snob, so, thanks.

mortsto-x: I know what you mean, though for me it is mostly
paranoia (without knowing anything), then ideology, then
some knowledge (nice how that takes a backseat)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-25 04:10 [#01159673]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to mortsto-x: #01159671 | Show recordbag



Yep, we've had alcohol for thousands of years... it is
understood in intimate detail. The oldest (synthetic)
recreational drug we have (and still use) is probably heroin
which is what, 100 odd years old? Things like acid and
ecstacy we've still not had for long enough for more than
one generation to use them since late teens and to grow old.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-25 04:18 [#01159674]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Before someone brings out the "You like techno don't you?
Everyone who makes Techno is on drugs. If you hate drugs so
much, you shouldn't listen to Techno..." argument, I'd like
to point out that a lot of that is youthful experimentation
with hallucinogens and/or a lifelong relationship with weed.
This isn't the same as being off your face on crack all the
time or in a comatose state from tranquilisers 24/7. Oh and
a lot of the founding father of (detroit) Techno don't touch
drugs at all...


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-25 04:33 [#01159676]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



Drugs help teens get through a career in porn, so it can't
be all that bad. Also, if drugs are so bad, why aren't they
called bad-drugs.



 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-25 21:09 [#01160271]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



*bump*

Hey! Did everyone just overdose? Hallloooo?? Where'd
everyone go?


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-04-25 21:14 [#01160273]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker | Followup to Paco: #01160271



ha!


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-04-25 21:27 [#01160275]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



i think id like to go on a retreat.


 

offline big from lsg on 2004-04-26 04:51 [#01160482]
Points: 23746 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



at times i worry about the 100 000 braincells i lose with
that one beer, i dont care how many i may have.
Also i quit smoking because i'd be pissed if i get
longcancer. That of course gives me certainty of what i'll
die of as well


 


Messageboard index