Child Porn? (why) | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 320 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614081
Today 1
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Child Porn? (why)
 

offline happy cycling from berlin on 2004-02-18 18:28 [#01079485]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular



Q: What's black and blue and doesn't like sex?
A: The little boy in the trunk of my car.


 

offline happy cycling from berlin on 2004-02-18 18:29 [#01079487]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular



She had entered my world, umber and black Humberland, with
rash curiosity; she surveyed it with a shrug of amused
distaste; and it seemed to me now that she was ready to turn
away from it with something akin to plain repulsion. Never
did she vibrate under my touch, and a strident 'what d'you
think you are doing?' was all I got for my pains.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-02-18 18:47 [#01079508]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i can't believe i haven't mad some sarcastic and
slightly/frighteningly autobiographical comment about this


 

offline xceque on 2004-02-18 18:50 [#01079510]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Followup to roygbivcore: #01079508 | Show recordbag



Yeah, it is a bit out of character, isn't it? Better
get on to it pronto!


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-02-18 18:55 [#01079514]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



"I try not to think of these things while luring girls into
my van with promises of candy."


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-02-18 19:12 [#01079530]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



that joke was wrong funkmaster it was

Q: whats black and blue and hates getting fucked?
A: A rape victim

anyways.... child porn is also people age of 17 on tape, is
that wrong?.. I dunno.. i dont think so, not if they want to
do it.

its really just up to people, ..... as long as no one is
getting hurt or sexually abused its ok... and yeah im not
talking about those 6 year olds nude and stuff, thats just
someones sick mind.. mental disorder? i dunno.. probably
not, .... there are billions of us on this planet, somehow
sometimes someone had to come out a bit fucked up./


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-02-18 21:43 [#01079633]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



the things is. When more than 10% of the population does it,
they'll say it's natural and you're born that way. Like the
Romans.


 

offline mimi on 2004-02-18 21:47 [#01079634]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01079182



i wouldn't really say that it isn't harmful just because of
the potential that's there...you know how people are, soon
looking through a telescope or whatever isn't going to be
enough and he's going to have to get closer and closer and
before long, he's not satisfied with anything short
of....sex, whatever it is.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 00:09 [#01079740]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



It depends on where your view of peadophilia extends to.
For example in some places 14 is the legal age of consentual
sex, others it's 16, others it's 18 and so on. Anything
under the legally set limit is considered unlawful sex with
a minor and you would be a child sex offender.

The reason it will never get discussed openly in public is
because far more people experience feelings at some point
than admit it, and they are scared that people will accuse
them. Same as with homosexuality. It is not wrong to have
the feelings, because you can't control that...it would be
wrong to act on those feelings though.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 00:11 [#01079742]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I bet there are very few straight lads who have saw a 13 or
14 girl in school uniform and not thought that she looks a
it tasty in a sexual way.

Or maybe I am just fucked up in the head :D


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2004-02-19 00:24 [#01079748]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



there's good and bad people and very evil people, Sigmund
Freud would say: the have a totaly fucked up (or no)
super-ego


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2004-02-19 00:25 [#01079750]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the= they (the evil people)


 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 00:27 [#01079751]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



We all have perversions and such in our minds; things we
recognize as abnormal ideas and desires. It's when someone
brings that perversion into reality that makes them a
'pervert'.

And child pornography (like all pornography, and don't get
me wrong, I'm down with the porno) gives the viewer the
impression that what's being displayed is normal and okay.
Pornography is a weird thing. It allows someone to passively
engage in an act, which, in the case of child pornography,
they would be arrested for had they physically aided the
act. And yes, when you watch porno, you are advocating the
behavior displayed on the screen.

Ultimately it comes down to (whether pedophiles like it or
not) pedophilia is not socially acceptable, just like
beastiality and whatnot. Sure, some people may get off on
it, but in our current "civilised" society, that just won't
fly.



 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 00:51 [#01079768]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



I think it's all very simple

people do not have a choice in what htey find aestheticly
attractive, they look at something and immediately like it
or not, people can't decide this, it just happens, I don't
think that someone who find extremely young kids attraactive
has a mental disorder, I think it's perfectly natural

however actually DOING it is another story, I don't think
that sexual activity, especially forced, is going to do any
good to a kid, I think it's safe to assume that it will fuck
them up for life, and anyone that is willing to do this to a
kid is pure fucking evil,

but I think collecting images and video's of such things is
perfectly fine, as long as it just stays a "fantasy" they
can have as much kiddy bootie material as they want, but
like I said, they don't have a choice on whether they like
it or not,...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 00:54 [#01079774]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079768 | Show recordbag



Don't be daft...by collecting videos and stuff you are
fueling the trade...and the fact of the matter is that
people become desensitised to things after time and need
something that goes a bit further to get the same fix...just
like drugs.

This in turn means there are people who will abuse more kids
to keep up with demand.

It does happen...just look at how people who get kicks out
of porn end up going more and more into what would be
considered a "fetish" area in their choice of viewing.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:14 [#01079790]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079774



but they don't ahve a choice on whether they like it or not,
and why should they be any less preveleged to view what they
like than us "normal" people


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 01:23 [#01079798]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079790 | Show recordbag



Lets say I liked to view your mum being raped...do
you think it is OK for someone to go and film themselves
raping her just for my pleasure?

Taking advantage of those who cannot defend themselves is
completely wrong.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:26 [#01079801]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079798



if you yourself instagated the whole thing (ie payed someone
to do it) than it is as bad as doing it yourself,


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2004-02-19 01:28 [#01079802]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular | Followup to Refund: #01079790



I agree with Lee. All porn subjects are exploited for money.
The difference with kiddy porn is that children are
involved, children who have no say in what is happening to
them. The people that make and fund these videos are the
most inhumane subspecies on the planet. They take peoples
childhoods away to fulfill their selfish fantasy.

Hardly harmless is it?


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-02-19 01:29 [#01079803]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #01079802



Yeah, that fucks a child up permanently, no exceptions.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 01:29 [#01079804]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079801 | Show recordbag



Let's say you have a little brother or sister. And they
were around at your parents friends house. And one of your
parents friends took photographs of them playing naked (not
even in a particularly explicit manner), and these photos
where put on the internet for men to wank off over...you
have no problem with that?


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:38 [#01079810]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079804



yes, that would be horrible,

I still think that "viewing" is entirely differnt to "doing"
even though at some point the "doing" has to occur, I think
it is sick, but I don't think viewing it is sick, I don't
get how anyone could like such things myself, but why should
that mean it's wrong?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 01:44 [#01079820]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079810 | Show recordbag



But viewing can only be done after the "doing" has occured,
which makes the viewer part of the problem. Even regular
porn makes me feel so fucking sad sometimes, when you look
into the eyes of the teenage girls and all you can see is
fear or pain. How anyone could find that erotic is beyond
me.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:50 [#01079826]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



people don't exactly "choose" waht they find erotic, do
they?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-19 01:51 [#01079829]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Refund: #01079826 | Show recordbag



Say you find murder erotic, does that make murder okay or
any more acceptable?


 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 01:51 [#01079831]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



But porno does exist where all participants are consensual
and enjoying the act. Take Jenna Jameson for example, or the
infamous Pam & Tommy video, or better yet, the Paris Hilton
vid. All three of these are very frequent downloads, and in
all cases the participants are having a blast and there's
nothing wrong with that. It just so happens that a lot of
people (straight men) get off on insulting and degrading
women. Take a gander into your local porno shop, note how
the Straight Men sections are riddled with titles such as
"White Trash Whore" or "Back Door Slut". These types of
films are more a product of society and the suppression of
woman sexuality. Some guys would rather see an attractive
woman as a "meathole" rather than a woman. And that's fucked
up, but it's even more fucked up when people start viewing
children as..... God, don't even want to think about that.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:51 [#01079832]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079820



if I were to compare it ot music, imagine you like the "on"
ep but in order to make the "on" ep, RDJ had to molest some
youngun for some reason, would you then not enjoy the music?


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:53 [#01079834]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01079829



it's not acceptable,

still,, some people download gory images and things,... it
doesn't make them a killer does it?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 01:58 [#01079837]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079834 | Show recordbag



But gory images are more often than not the product of
unforseen and unfortunate circumstances.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:01 [#01079841]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Ohhh kids... oooooooooohhhhhhh KIDS! Mmm MMM!

I love that vsnares sample!


 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 02:06 [#01079845]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Refund: We all have perversions and such in our minds;
things we recognize as abnormal ideas and desires. It's
when someone brings that perversion into reality that makes
them a 'pervert'.

In watching the child pornography you are participating in
the production of the child pornography.

Music Example: But making music is harmless, there are no
victims when Richard D. James writes a song. There are no
raped children.

Gory Images: If someone buys a video of a man killing
another man for the purpose of selling the video, I believe
that that makes that person pretty damn close to the murder.
These child pornographic images aren't a happenchance sort
of deal, like a film of some getting their head chopped off,
these videos are made for the purpose of FILMING CHILD ABUSE
AND MOLESTATION.


 

offline Intruder from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-19 02:14 [#01079853]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Ill bet aaron funk has a thing for kids. either that or his
mommy didnt give him enough love. or maybe his daddy too
much...


 

offline Intruder from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-19 02:15 [#01079855]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



shit. you guys talking about vsnares already? i guess its
obvious i didnt read any of this thread after the first page
eh?


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:16 [#01079858]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



"Music Example: But making music is harmless, there are no
victims when Richard D. James writes a song. There are no
raped children."

but if there was, would you not enjoy the song?



 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 02:17 [#01079861]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Vsnares loves that shockcore. I'm not convinced he's
demented, just think he really enjoys convincing people he
is.


 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 02:24 [#01079867]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Refund: If the production of the song "On" did somehow
involve the raping of children, if RDJ could not write the
song unless he was molesting his niece, then I probably
wouldn't be feeling the song too much. Just in the same way
I could never get into Deep Throat (the original movie)
knowing that the girl was forced at gun-point to go through
with some scenes. If Squarepusher had to rape a dog in order
to write Ultravisitor, I would most definitely not be so
fond of "Everyday I Love".


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:34 [#01079876]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



Refund: If the production of the song "On" did somehow
involve the raping of children, if RDJ could not write the
song unless he was molesting his niece, then I probably
wouldn't be feeling the song too much

but it wouldn't change the song any would it?

it'd still be the same song with the same aesthetic value,

I'm trying to say that "enjoying a song you like is
alright"

if these sort of images and things were %100 accurately and
authenticly replicated though video graphics, would that
htne make it alright?


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:38 [#01079880]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



[edit]

if these sort of images and things were %100 accurately and
authenticly replicated though video graphics, would that
htne make it alright to view them,... as there has been no
harm done in the first place,.

I tihnk so,

and because I beleive that people can't choose what there
instincts tell them they like, I think it'd be perfectly
fine, and "ideal" for people that have been given such an
unfortunate fetish to get some release, because otherwise
they could get it no other way,


 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 02:46 [#01079892]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



Yes, it would change my perception of the song. I would know
that the song is about child molestation, which I do not
agree with, hence, I would probably grow to dislike and
detest the music. In the same sense that I can watch porno
in which a guy is getting head and be okay with it, whereas,
if I were to watch Deep Throat I could not enjoy it.

"%100 accurately and
authenticly replicated"

Don't follow you. I don't believe any hypothetical situation
could excuse the production of child pornography. Sure,
people can get off on child pornography, but this doesn't
make it's production OK. Just because some likes seeing
people murdered doesn't mean it's OK to murder someone.

I keep trying to drill in that I accept that people are
attracted to children, that pedophilia exists, but this does
not excuse this sort of behavior. I am discussing the
prevalence of child pornography in society and how it is not
OK. In otherwords, it is not socially acceptible. Someone
may enjoy kidnapping children and eating them. Sure, they
can't help that they like kidnapping and eating children,
but they must understand that such behaviour is absolutely
inappropriate and unacceptible.



 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:50 [#01079895]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #01079892



"%100 accurately and
authenticly replicated"

Don't follow you.

- thats where the problem lies

read it again.

"
if these sort of images and things were %100 accurately and
authenticly replicated though video graphics, would that
htne make it alright to view them,... as there has been no
harm done in the first place,.
"


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:53 [#01079901]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



I don't want to get into an argument over this, which I can
sorta feel coming on,.. I think I have explained my point
well enough now anyway

love and peace


 

offline wimp on 2004-02-19 03:00 [#01079914]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



I'm assuming the scenario in which you are trying to convey
is something along the lines of, say, a drawing of child
abuse. Much Japanese manga features scenes of child
molestation and abuse. Now, these are just drawings,
however, these drawings promote an atmosphere in which child
molestation and abuse are okay, which is not okay. Though
the production of these materials in no way directly harms
children, indirectly the consequences can be terrible. What
I'm saying is that the production and viewing of said
materials, be they manga, videos, or pictures creates an
atmosphere in which the producer/viewer find this behaviour
to be okay.

People get off on child pornography, but this doesn't make
it's production OK. Hence, in order for this "release" to
take place, a crime must be commited and a life must be
ruined. If this is what you deem necessary in order for a
pedophile to achieve "release", I recommend that you look
into alternative therapy for pedophiles. And yes, pedophiles
need therapy if they cannot accept the laws of our society,
which protect the citizens of society. It is not okay to put
a life in jeopardy in order for a pedophile to feel some
sort of "release".



 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 03:09 [#01079929]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



I'm just saying I think actually molesting a child is
fucking horrible,

but people can't control what they like, you either like it
or you don't, there's no choice

so if there was a way in which noone got hurt, I think it is
fine for people to indulge in such things, I think it is
possible to be "into" child porn but still think that doing
it is just plain fucking wrong


 

offline optimus prime on 2004-02-19 04:04 [#01079978]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker



*listens to On.

:O


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-02-19 04:05 [#01079981]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



why?
why not?

i'm serrious. it's fucked up, but it's like anything.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 04:14 [#01079991]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



If the kid wants it, let the kid have it.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-02-19 04:20 [#01079999]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



it's verry verry wrrong howeverr and people who do rrape a
child (it's always rrape), should have theirr penis cut off.
i stand by that.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-19 04:21 [#01080001]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01079999 | Show recordbag



Why? they could still fist them.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-02-19 04:23 [#01080003]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



virginpusher touches little boys.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-02-19 04:23 [#01080005]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



and theirr hands and feet and head. fuck it, i'd rreduce
them to a torrso.


 


Messageboard index