| 
          | 
        
        
         | 
                     
	  |           
        
        
           happy cycling
             on 2004-02-18 18:28 [#01079485]
         Points: 2788 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Q: What's black and blue and doesn't like sex? A: The little boy in the trunk of my car.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           happy cycling
             on 2004-02-18 18:29 [#01079487]
         Points: 2788 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
She had entered my world, umber and black Humberland, with  rash curiosity; she surveyed it with a shrug of amused  distaste; and it seemed to me now that she was ready to turn  away from it with something akin to plain repulsion. Never  did she vibrate under my touch, and a strident 'what d'you  think you are doing?' was all I got for my pains. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-02-18 18:47 [#01079508]
         Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i can't believe i haven't mad some sarcastic and  slightly/frighteningly autobiographical comment about this 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           xceque
             on 2004-02-18 18:50 [#01079510]
         Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Followup to roygbivcore: #01079508 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Yeah, it is a bit out of character, isn't it? Better  get on to it pronto! 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-02-18 18:55 [#01079514]
         Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"I try not to think of these things while luring girls into  my van with promises of candy." 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           REFLEX
             from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-02-18 19:12 [#01079530]
         Points: 8864 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
that joke was wrong funkmaster it was 
  Q: whats black and blue and hates getting fucked? A: A rape victim
  anyways.... child porn is also people age of 17 on tape, is  that wrong?.. I dunno.. i dont think so, not if they want to  do it.
 
  its really just up to people, ..... as long as no one is  getting hurt or sexually abused its ok... and yeah im not  talking about those 6 year olds nude and stuff, thats just  someones sick mind.. mental disorder? i dunno.. probably  not, .... there are billions of us on this planet, somehow  sometimes someone had to come out a bit fucked up./ 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           bogala
             from NYC (United States) on 2004-02-18 21:43 [#01079633]
         Points: 5125 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
the things is. When more than 10% of the population does it,  they'll say it's natural and you're born that way. Like the  Romans. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           mimi
             on 2004-02-18 21:47 [#01079634]
         Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01079182
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i wouldn't really say that it isn't harmful just because of  the potential that's there...you know how people are, soon  looking through a telescope or whatever isn't going to be  enough and he's going to have to get closer and closer and  before long, he's not satisfied with anything short  of....sex, whatever it is. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 00:09 [#01079740]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
It depends on where your view of peadophilia extends to.   For example in some places 14 is the legal age of consentual  sex, others it's 16, others it's 18 and so on.  Anything  under the legally set limit is considered unlawful sex with  a minor and you would be a child sex offender.
 
  The reason it will never get discussed openly in public is  because far more people experience feelings at some point  than admit it, and they are scared that people will accuse  them.  Same as with homosexuality.  It is not wrong to have  the feelings, because you can't control that...it would be  wrong to act on those feelings though. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 00:11 [#01079742]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I bet there are very few straight lads who have saw a 13 or  14 girl in school uniform and not thought that she looks a  it tasty in a sexual way.
 
  Or maybe I am just fucked up in the head :D
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           -crazone
             from smashing acid over and over on 2004-02-19 00:24 [#01079748]
         Points: 11235 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
there's good and bad people and very evil people, Sigmund  Freud would say: the have a totaly fucked up (or no)  super-ego  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           -crazone
             from smashing acid over and over on 2004-02-19 00:25 [#01079750]
         Points: 11235 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
the= they (the evil people)
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 00:27 [#01079751]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
We all have perversions and such in our minds; things we  recognize as abnormal ideas and desires. It's when someone  brings that perversion into reality that makes them a  'pervert'. 
 
  And child pornography (like all pornography, and don't get  me wrong, I'm down with the porno) gives the viewer the  impression that what's being displayed is normal and okay.  Pornography is a weird thing. It allows someone to passively  engage in an act, which, in the case of child pornography,  they would be arrested for had they physically aided the  act. And yes, when you watch porno, you are advocating the  behavior displayed on the screen.
 
  Ultimately it comes down to (whether pedophiles like it or  not) pedophilia is not socially acceptable, just like  beastiality and whatnot. Sure, some people may get off on  it, but in our current "civilised" society, that just won't  fly.     
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 00:51 [#01079768]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I think it's all very simple
  people do not have a choice in what htey find aestheticly  attractive, they look at something and immediately like it  or not, people can't decide this, it just happens, I don't  think that someone who find extremely young kids attraactive  has a mental disorder, I think it's perfectly natural
 
  however actually DOING it is another story,  I don't think  that sexual activity, especially forced, is going to do any  good to a kid, I think it's safe to assume that it will fuck  them up for life, and anyone that is willing to do this to a  kid is pure fucking evil,
 
  but I think collecting images and video's of such things is  perfectly fine, as long as it just stays a "fantasy" they  can have as much kiddy bootie material as they want, but  like I said, they don't have a choice on whether they like  it or not,... 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 00:54 [#01079774]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079768 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Don't be daft...by collecting videos and stuff you are  fueling the trade...and the fact of the matter is that  people become desensitised to things after time and need  something that goes a bit further to get the same fix...just  like drugs.
 
  This in turn means there are people who will abuse more kids  to keep up with demand.
 
  It does happen...just look at how people who get kicks out  of porn end up going more and more into what would be  considered a "fetish" area in their choice of viewing. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:14 [#01079790]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079774
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
but they don't ahve a choice on whether they like it or not,  and why should they be any less preveleged to view what they  like than us "normal" people 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 01:23 [#01079798]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079790 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Lets say I liked to view your mum being raped...do  you think it is OK for someone to go and film themselves  raping her just for my pleasure?
 
  Taking advantage of those who cannot defend themselves is  completely wrong. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:26 [#01079801]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079798
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
if you yourself instagated the whole thing (ie payed someone  to do it) than it is as bad as doing it yourself, 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           mc_303_beatz
             from Glasgow, Scotland on 2004-02-19 01:28 [#01079802]
         Points: 3386 Status: Regular | Followup to Refund: #01079790
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I agree with Lee. All porn subjects are exploited for money.  The difference with kiddy porn is that children are  involved, children who have no say in what is happening to  them. The people that make and fund these videos are the  most inhumane subspecies on the planet. They take peoples  childhoods away to fulfill their selfish fantasy.
 
  Hardly harmless is it?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           mappatazee
             from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-02-19 01:29 [#01079803]
         Points: 14302 Status: Lurker | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #01079802
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Yeah, that fucks a child up permanently, no exceptions.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 01:29 [#01079804]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079801 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Let's say you have a little brother or sister.  And they  were around at your parents friends house.  And one of your  parents friends took photographs of them playing naked (not  even in a particularly explicit manner), and these photos  where put on the internet for men to wank off over...you  have no problem with that? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:38 [#01079810]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079804
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
yes, that would be horrible,
  I still think that "viewing" is entirely differnt to "doing"  even though at some point the "doing" has to occur, I think  it is sick, but I don't think viewing it is sick, I don't  get how anyone could like such things myself, but why should  that mean it's wrong? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 01:44 [#01079820]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079810 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
But viewing can only be done after the "doing" has occured,  which makes the viewer part of the problem.   Even regular  porn makes me feel so fucking sad sometimes, when you look  into the eyes of the teenage girls and all you can see is  fear or pain.  How anyone could find that erotic is beyond  me. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:50 [#01079826]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
people don't exactly "choose" waht they find erotic, do  they? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Ceri JC
             from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-19 01:51 [#01079829]
         Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Refund: #01079826 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Say you find murder erotic, does that make murder okay or  any more acceptable? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 01:51 [#01079831]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
But porno does exist where all participants are consensual  and enjoying the act. Take Jenna Jameson for example, or the  infamous Pam & Tommy video, or better yet, the Paris Hilton  vid. All three of these are very frequent downloads, and in  all cases the participants are having a blast and there's  nothing wrong with that. It just so happens that a lot of  people (straight men) get off on insulting and degrading  women. Take a gander into your local porno shop, note how  the Straight Men sections are riddled with titles such as  "White Trash Whore" or "Back Door Slut". These types of  films are more a product of society and the suppression of  woman sexuality. Some guys would rather see an attractive  woman as a "meathole" rather than a woman. And that's fucked  up, but it's even more fucked up when people start viewing  children as..... God, don't even want to think about that. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:51 [#01079832]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01079820
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
if I were to compare it ot music, imagine you like the "on"  ep but in order to make the "on" ep, RDJ had to molest some  youngun for some reason, would you then not enjoy the music? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 01:53 [#01079834]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01079829
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
it's not acceptable,
  still,, some people download gory images and things,... it  doesn't make them a killer does it? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 01:58 [#01079837]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Refund: #01079834 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
But gory images are more often than not the product of  unforseen and unfortunate circumstances. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           princo
             from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:01 [#01079841]
         Points: 13411 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Ohhh kids... oooooooooohhhhhhh KIDS! Mmm MMM!
   I love that vsnares sample!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 02:06 [#01079845]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Refund: We all have perversions and such in our minds;  things we  recognize as abnormal ideas and desires. It's  when someone brings that perversion into reality that makes  them a 'pervert'. 
 
  In watching the child pornography you are participating in  the production of the child pornography. 
 
  Music Example: But making music is harmless, there are no  victims when Richard D. James writes a song. There are no  raped children.
 
  Gory Images: If someone buys a video of a man killing  another man for the purpose of selling the video, I believe  that that makes that person pretty damn close to the murder.  These child pornographic images aren't a happenchance sort  of deal, like a film of some getting their head chopped off,  these videos are made for the purpose of FILMING CHILD ABUSE  AND MOLESTATION.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Intruder
             from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-19 02:14 [#01079853]
         Points: 581 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Ill bet aaron funk has a thing for kids. either that or his  mommy didnt give him enough love. or maybe his daddy too  much... 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Intruder
             from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-19 02:15 [#01079855]
         Points: 581 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
shit. you guys talking about vsnares already? i guess its  obvious i didnt read any of this thread after the first page  eh? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:16 [#01079858]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"Music Example: But making music is harmless, there are no victims when Richard D. James writes a song. There are no raped children."
  but if there was, would you not enjoy the song?
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 02:17 [#01079861]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Vsnares loves that shockcore. I'm not convinced he's  demented, just think he really enjoys convincing people he  is.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 02:24 [#01079867]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Refund: If the production of the song "On" did somehow  involve the raping of children, if RDJ could not write the  song unless he was molesting his niece, then I probably  wouldn't be feeling the song too much. Just in the same way  I could never get into Deep Throat (the original movie)  knowing that the girl was forced at gun-point to go through  with some scenes. If Squarepusher had to rape a dog in order  to write Ultravisitor, I would most definitely not be so  fond of "Everyday I Love". 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:34 [#01079876]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Refund: If the production of the song "On" did somehow involve the raping of children, if RDJ could not write the song unless he was molesting his niece, then I probably wouldn't be feeling the song too much
  but it wouldn't change the song any would it?
  it'd still be the same song with the same aesthetic value, 
  I'm trying to say that "enjoying a song you like is  alright"
 
  if these sort of images and things were %100 accurately and  authenticly replicated though video graphics, would that  htne make it alright? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:38 [#01079880]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
[edit] 
  if these sort of images and things were %100 accurately and authenticly replicated though video graphics, would that htne make it alright to view them,... as there has been no  harm done in the first place,.
 
  I tihnk so,
  and because I beleive that people can't choose what there  instincts tell them they like, I think it'd be perfectly  fine, and "ideal" for people that have been given such an  unfortunate fetish to get some release, because otherwise  they could get it no other way, 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 02:46 [#01079892]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Yes, it would change my perception of the song. I would know  that the song is about child molestation, which I do not  agree with, hence, I would probably grow to dislike and  detest the music. In the same sense that I can watch porno  in which a guy is getting head and be okay with it, whereas,  if I were to watch Deep Throat I could not enjoy it.
 
  "%100 accurately and  authenticly replicated"
  Don't follow you. I don't believe any hypothetical situation  could excuse the production of child pornography. Sure,  people can get off on child pornography, but this doesn't  make it's production OK. Just because some likes seeing  people murdered doesn't mean it's OK to murder someone. 
 
  I keep trying to drill in that I accept that people are  attracted to children, that pedophilia exists, but this does  not excuse this sort of behavior. I am discussing the  prevalence of child pornography in society and how it is not  OK. In otherwords, it is not socially acceptible. Someone  may enjoy kidnapping children and eating them. Sure, they  can't help that they like kidnapping and eating children,  but they must understand that such behaviour is absolutely  inappropriate and unacceptible. 
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:50 [#01079895]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #01079892
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"%100 accurately and authenticly replicated"
  Don't follow you.
  - thats where the problem lies
  read it again.
  " if these sort of images and things were %100 accurately and authenticly replicated though video graphics, would that htne make it alright to view them,... as there has been no harm done in the first place,.  "
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 02:53 [#01079901]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I don't want to get into an argument over this, which I can  sorta feel coming on,.. I think I have explained my point  well enough now anyway
 
  love and peace
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           wimp
             on 2004-02-19 03:00 [#01079914]
         Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I'm assuming the scenario in which you are trying to convey  is something along the lines of, say, a drawing of child  abuse. Much Japanese manga features scenes of child  molestation and abuse. Now, these are just drawings,  however, these drawings promote an atmosphere in which child  molestation and abuse are okay, which is not okay. Though  the production of these materials in no way directly harms  children, indirectly the consequences can be terrible. What  I'm saying is that the production and viewing of said  materials, be they manga, videos, or pictures creates an  atmosphere in which the producer/viewer find this behaviour  to be okay. 
 
  People get off on child pornography, but this doesn't make  it's production OK. Hence, in order for this "release" to  take place, a crime must be commited and a life must be  ruined. If this is what you deem necessary in order for a  pedophile to achieve "release", I recommend that you look  into alternative therapy for pedophiles. And yes, pedophiles  need therapy if they cannot accept the laws of our society,  which protect the citizens of society. It is not okay to put  a life in jeopardy in order for a pedophile to feel some  sort of "release".
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-02-19 03:09 [#01079929]
         Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I'm just saying I think actually molesting a child is  fucking horrible,
 
  but people can't control what they like, you either like it  or you don't, there's no choice
 
  so if there was a way in which noone got hurt, I think it is  fine for people to indulge in such things, I think it is  possible to be "into" child porn but still think that doing  it is just plain fucking wrong 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           optimus prime
             on 2004-02-19 04:04 [#01079978]
         Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
*listens to On.
  :O
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Anus_Presley
             on 2004-02-19 04:05 [#01079981]
         Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
why? why not?
  i'm serrious. it's fucked up, but it's like anything. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 04:14 [#01079991]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
If the kid wants it, let the kid have it.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Anus_Presley
             on 2004-02-19 04:20 [#01079999]
         Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
it's verry verry wrrong howeverr and people who do rrape a  child (it's always rrape), should have theirr penis cut off.  i stand by that.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           ecnadniarb
             on 2004-02-19 04:21 [#01080001]
         Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01079999 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Why? they could still fist them.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           princo
             from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-02-19 04:23 [#01080003]
         Points: 13411 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
virginpusher touches little boys.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Anus_Presley
             on 2004-02-19 04:23 [#01080005]
         Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
and theirr hands and feet and head. fuck it, i'd rreduce  them to a torrso.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
         
         
Messageboard index 
              
        
 
	 
	  |