No WMD! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 378 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614082
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
No WMD!
 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-24 06:17 [#01046730]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



So the head of the US weapons inspection team quits, saying
he doesnt think they have produced WMD since the first Gulf
War... so what do they do, replace him and carry on
searching. I wonder when they wil give up and admit there
are no WMD?

Does anyone think after a while they will plant some
evidence there themselves?

Tony Blair should resign, its obvious he took the country to
war on the basis of false information. Its a shame really
because apart from this Iraq business he's not a bad Prime
Minister.


 

offline nlogax from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2004-01-24 06:19 [#01046732]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular



If they don't find any, they will plant it.


 

offline nacmat on 2004-01-24 06:20 [#01046734]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



wmd are mainly in the usa.

why can they have them?

we all know this war had nothing to do with that


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-24 06:21 [#01046735]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to nlogax: #01046732 | Show recordbag



thats what i'm thinking, thats why they continue despite him
saying there are no WMD, to give them time to do it. Then
they'll say "look dudes, we found em! told ya we would!"


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-24 06:22 [#01046736]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01046734 | Show recordbag



its interesting that this is hardly big news in the US (from
looking on CNN and Fox News), yet it's BIG news here in the
UK.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-01-24 06:30 [#01046743]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01046736



It is an American trait to be unable to apologise or admit
mistake... in that Alpha male dominated country, that kind
of honesty is seen as a weakness.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-24 06:46 [#01046750]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



They went to war to secure America's future oil supply. If
their cover story is breaking down now, I don't think they
really give a shit. "Oh, no WMD, well they were thinking
about WMD. Uh, so yeah." *shrug*

If John Kerry gets too popular, watch what happens - maybe
there'll be some terrorists in Syria or Iran that need to be
taken down. And you wouldn't change presidents in the middle
of a war, now would you?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-24 07:00 [#01046762]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01046743 | Show recordbag



...and their history of litigation. Americans see admission
of having done something wrong as giving someone the go
ahead to try to sue them. They seem not to understand that
in other cultures, a sincere apology can disuade the other
party from such action.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-24 07:02 [#01046765]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01046750 | Show recordbag



when exactly is the US election? I'm sure the whole world
will be watching and hoping Bush doesn't stop in power.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-01-24 07:07 [#01046766]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



november


 

offline iBAN from Brisvegas (Australia) on 2004-01-24 07:32 [#01046773]
Points: 334 Status: Lurker



YOUR JOKING!! THERE'S NO WMD?!? OH MY GOD!!! NO!! THERE MUST
BE!! THEY COULDNT HAVE LIED ABOUT THAT!!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-01-24 07:34 [#01046776]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01046762



Very true, Ceri--The litigation culture is a key theme in
the USA. It is so bad that I remember my wife's sister being
sued by another sister for a car accident. It is also, like
much of Western Society, open to corruption, for another of
my wife's sister was involved in a very minor
accident--basically a nudge--which she then claimed to
caused her to suffer a bad neck injury, and so sued the
other driver. That kind of downright deceit makes me sick.


 


Messageboard index