This many people on the Mb | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 387 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
This many people on the Mb
 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-20 19:23 [#01042357]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



with this many people on the Mb its crazy! shit! fuck! ass!
holy christ i mean I post in one topic and then when i hit
return "POST" its all the way at the bottom again? crazy.


 

offline tragedy from Gloucester (United States) on 2004-01-20 19:28 [#01042360]
Points: 4423 Status: Lurker



dude..... i'm so confused.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-01-20 19:29 [#01042361]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



at a time like this... i really wish i had something worth
saying... but no


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:11 [#01042362]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



seriously though, its fucked up! no one else notice this? it
says 76 members online right now, its late! and also what
the hell? i made like 2 topics in the last 10 minutes and
they all disappeared, shot right to the bottom of the list,
and ones stayed where they were, with the same amount of
posts in them? thats not possible the way the MB is layed
out, if someone posts in something it gets shot to the top,
not the bottom, and things dont stay where they are if one
goes above it? weird.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:12 [#01042367]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



now there are 5 people online, 1 second ago there were
almost 80!


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:14 [#01042370]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



yeah, i just posted in a reply in another thread that for
some reason ended up above the opening post, then below the
opening post was another reply...

that's and order of:
3rd
1st
2nd

...it's not sensical


 

offline tunemx from Budapest (Hungary) on 2004-01-21 02:14 [#01042371]
Points: 2144 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



It was because the system time was wrong. It thought it is
yesterday 8 pm, and counting everybody logged on since then
:) Now it's fixed.


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2004-01-21 02:15 [#01042374]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



Just realized what you guys are talking about.
Now online (15)
mortsto-x
REFLEX
Zeus
TonyFish
tragedy
staplemouth
tunemx
Co-existence
korben dallas
ISayNothing
pxoxoxpxy
DeadEight
neetta
nocturne
Sepix

Three minutes ago it was a shitload of people


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:16 [#01042378]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



cool... tune dood any explination for why topics that were
freshly made shot right down to the bottom of the list and
whatnot?


 

offline tunemx from Budapest (Hungary) on 2004-01-21 02:18 [#01042384]
Points: 2144 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



Yeah check this thread.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:20 [#01042386]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



hmm i guess it still doesnt fully explain why they jumped
like that.... is it because of the time thing? or..... er..
iam confused, if this is a dumb question disregard it. heh.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:21 [#01042387]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



we don't hate you... we just have nothing to talk about...
so we decided to talk about the same thing in multiple
threads... please be patient with us... discussing zany
messageboard mishaps is the equivalent of talking about the
weather with someone you don't really know...


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:23 [#01042390]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



hahaha!!!!!

*how true.


 

offline tunemx from Budapest (Hungary) on 2004-01-21 02:26 [#01042399]
Points: 2144 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



Well the board is counting the number of the people who was
last active, in the latter 30 minutes. If the system time is
wrong it will measure a bigger time frame. With me so far?
:-)

I don't know why the system clock was wrong btw. The server
was rebooted, maybe by the hosting company's technicians, or
just an OS-related bug, I have no idea yet.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-21 02:27 [#01042400]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



tunemx: oh i got yah! thanks a lot for explaining a bit
better. helped. cool man.


 


Messageboard index