|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-01-14 19:04 [#01033852]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
Didn't they already go to the moon?
|
|
nacmat
on 2004-01-14 19:13 [#01033867]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
bush needs more votes
|
|
Labium Sweat
from United States on 2004-01-14 19:15 [#01033868]
Points: 922 Status: Regular
|
|
Yeah, but I guess Bush doesn't realise that.
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-01-14 19:20 [#01033879]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
it's because the chinese plan on landing and colonizing... (and i'm definitely cheering for them)
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2004-01-14 19:37 [#01033895]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
again
there are reasons for this i don't feel we should spend the money now
but a giant telescope (as ive stated many times before) on the dark side of the moon with no atmosphere could catch that one astroid heading towards earth that no satellite scope could ever catch..............................
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2004-01-14 19:37 [#01033896]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
then we could nuke it like armagedd0n the movie
ok thats sarcasm, but my above post i fulheartedly beleive.
it would also provide incredbile images never before seen
think of the possibilities.
|
|
Messageboard index
|