portable sampling | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 331 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
portable sampling
 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2004-01-06 16:06 [#01020998]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



ok so i want to be able to record sounds to use in music
production from a greater range than the 10 feat or so
radius around my PC that i am currently limited to

like recording sounds outdoors and around the city, etc

tell me about portable samplers please..... ADATS or
whatever other options are out there

anyone have one?

what about minidiscs? some of the player/recorders have
microphone inputs... how is the sound quality on those?

what do you use for portable sampling?

etc you get the idea.... just RESPOND for once..... im...
lonely.....


 

offline spoonz from Edmonton, AB (Canada) on 2004-01-06 16:13 [#01021009]
Points: 3219 Status: Regular



i can't help you since i know nothing about it, but i like
you, and i'm also curious about the same thing. and i too am
lonely. so yeah. bump :)


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-01-06 16:13 [#01021010]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



im using the archos jukebox recorder 20 for this type of
thing.

records directly to mp3 format.. 20gb capacity.

i love it as if i gave birth to it.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-01-06 16:14 [#01021011]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Me love minidisc.


 

offline staplemouth on 2004-01-06 16:26 [#01021022]
Points: 556 Status: Lurker



i have a really long mic cable, so i can go around my room,
and adjacent rooms.

wouldnt mind a minidic recorder however


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2004-01-06 17:38 [#01021160]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



i've wondered the same thing. i've been thinking about
picking up a minidisc recorder for just this reason. it
appears that the current lineup would require a microphone
with a preamp built in, since the recorders don't have a
true 'mic' input, just a line level input. radio shack used
to have a really good one of these for $30 that used a watch
battery, but not sure if they do anymore.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-01-06 17:47 [#01021190]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dozier: #01021160 | Show recordbag



Most Minidisc units have both a line in and a mic in. Only
the cheap NetMD ones seem to be missing the mic input off.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-06 17:50 [#01021201]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



what I heard from a friend, MD aren't very good quality for
recording. no.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2004-01-08 13:53 [#01023718]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



buuuump.....
anyone else?

pomme de terre, whats the sound quality like? compared to
minidisc, dat, tape etc if you know...


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 13:59 [#01023729]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01021201



well then he's talking rubbish


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 14:04 [#01023741]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dozier: #01021160



buy a small decent mic for your md, i've got a batteryless
sony one and the sound quality is amazing

mine was £50 (~$75)


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-08 14:24 [#01023772]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



well, md is not very good quality indeed but it's okay.
(better then mp3...) if you want better quality there's
always the portable dat recorder. ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$)


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2004-01-08 14:27 [#01023776]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



see new minidisk format thread


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 14:31 [#01023780]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bremzen: #01023772



well its good enough for what these people need and 50% of
the sound quality depends on how its been mic'ed, which mic
and how its been recorded (and whether its stereo, mono, lp2
or lp4)


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-01-08 14:32 [#01023781]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



http://www.barnofhell.com/aleuchatistas.htm

heres a live show i recorded with mine.


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-08 14:32 [#01023782]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



which won't result in a better quality though... just more
storage


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-08 14:33 [#01023784]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



well, ofcourse... the mic is pretty important... two good
ones are even more important :)


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 14:34 [#01023788]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bremzen: #01023782



yeah but long play uses different levels of compression,
hence why stereo sounds the best, size is just a consequence
of the increased compression


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-08 14:35 [#01023789]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



(okay, i seem to forget the followup option here... the post
above is a followup to B3n's last post, the other one a
followup to hepburnenthorpe... sorry)


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 14:37 [#01023794]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bremzen: #01023784



surely it depends on what you are recording and how you want
it recorded?


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-01-08 14:37 [#01023795]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



but if you are sampling, im very pleased with my unit. it
may not be auiophile quality, but it fits in my pocket plugs
in via usb to transfer the audio file and could potentially
record over 500 hours of audio.

i may lose a little quality for sampling, but i can always
just process the sound to clean it up and get it sounding
right.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 14:41 [#01023800]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to pomme de terre: #01023795



exactly, keiron hebden and scott herren both make much use
of it on their albums (even vocals)....I think people take
this sound quality stuff too seriously, some of the best
records made were made with wank equipment


 

offline blobula from BElgraDe on 2004-01-08 14:44 [#01023810]
Points: 1253 Status: Lurker



but not md and ipod are samplers. there are quite few
portable samplers, old and with very low memory.....sad


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 14:48 [#01023818]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to blobula: #01023810



yeah they are, just not dedicated... they are phrase
samplers


 

offline blobula from BElgraDe on 2004-01-08 15:24 [#01023874]
Points: 1253 Status: Lurker



but you can only shufle them making loops is impossible.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-08 15:57 [#01023950]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



lets put it this way: sound designers/engineers in Hollywood
have been using minidiscs more and more.

DATs, while using higher quality, are much more of a pain in
the ass. Because DATs are based on moving parts. Shit goes
wrong. To get it fixed, it will cost you, and take time.

Thats the main reason DATs are being slowly filtered out.

In the end, the sound quality you get isnt going to be
noticeable enough to justify a DAT (imo).

but... if you REALLY want high quality recording... and are
willing to pay, the Marantz PMD670 hard disk recorder is the
way to go. (Over $1000USD)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-08 15:59 [#01023955]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to B3n: #01023818



well technically, a sampler is a unit that allows for
musical playback of recorded sound. Emphasis on the word
"musical", As in, an instrument.

MD, iPod, DAT, PMD670: they are technically just recorders.



 

offline Dinosaur from United Kingdom on 2004-01-08 16:10 [#01023987]
Points: 312 Status: Lurker



my minidisc recorder is working oh so nicely. I can sample
all sorts of goodies and put them in tracks and the quality
is amazing. I have a sony mz-n1 or something liek that. I
will never sell it.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-08 17:19 [#01024081]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01023955



yep I concede you're right, but as with most things I reckon
its what you make of it and you can do a certain amount of
editing of sounds

didn't gescom make an md that could be put on shuffle to
make new tracks? that's pretty smart

as with the whole quality thing, I still think they are
excellent..


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2004-01-18 19:03 [#01039807]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



well i think im set on a mini-disc recorder.... free form
used them for collecting the sounds on Audiotourism, plus
the other artists mentioned in this thread.... so its good
enough for me
its just so much cheaper and more practical then the other
options...

so next step:
what about mics?

again.. what do you use?
how much do you need to spend to get quality?
what do you look for?
etc and so on.....

i want to use one to record my guitar amp, but i also want
to record sounds outdoors... will i need ifferent mics for
this?
also... is there a size/performance trade off?
i dont want to carry a foot-long foam thing on teh
subway.....


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-10-21 01:49 [#01756020]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



DAT recorders aren't even made anymore, right?

So there's Minidisc which can do 16/44

For flash card there's the Roland Edirol R-1 which does
24/44
both with 1/8" jacks (and I find it to be quite ugly).

And there's the Marantz PMD660 16/44 that has XLR mic
connectors. It says though that it will 'run for four hours
on four AA cells'. WTF. Even the Edirol was only 2.5 hours
recording time on the batteries (6 hour playback).

I think I will be getting Minidisc as the options seem quite
limited. Does anyone have any experience with the above
mentioned flash recorders?


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2005-10-21 01:59 [#01756022]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



so many ex-addicts in this thread ! i even don't remember
them =$


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-10-21 02:03 [#01756023]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



someone tell me this... what would be better quality...
recording to minidisc, and then recording that realtime into
the PC as a wav, OR using my iriver to record direct to 320
bitrate mp3? i'm inclined to think the latter, but maybe
some audiophile nutjob among you will flip out and i'd
really like to see that, so have at it


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-10-21 02:04 [#01756026]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Oh I guess Sony just announced this 'thing' last week but
it's like $2000 and I want to stay under $500.


Attached picture

 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-10-21 02:05 [#01756028]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to vacant: #01756023



Record it realtime? Can't you just grab the .wav file off
it?


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-10-21 02:07 [#01756029]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



not with my sony netMD... the fuckers have rules built in
where you can't do anything easy like that at all. iriver is
much more forgiving, i can upload the mp3 like any file, no
proprietary software, no nonsense. minidiscs could have been
great if people didn't get antsy about copyrights


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-10-21 02:11 [#01756033]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Are all minidisc like that?


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-10-21 02:11 [#01756034]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



incredibly hypocritical to go and make that hard disc
recorder... fuck sony are bastards. oh now its perfectly
fine to make perfect wav concert bootlegs since mp3 players
are socially accepted now and things are changed. well now
minidiscs are as good as crap. oh well. maybe i'll buy that
gescom someday so it has a purpose


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2005-10-21 02:12 [#01756035]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



i believe they are... at least that i've seen. but the netMD
line was extra bad, or something. i never got that into the
MD culture


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-10-21 02:14 [#01756036]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01021201 | Show recordbag



That's what I heard too, and experienced first hand using a
mate's MD and cheapo mic. Since then, I have "heard" that a
decent minidisc, with a good mic gives more than acceptable
results. Having acquired a good minidisc, I am just waiting
for funds to get a decent mic(s)


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-10-21 05:15 [#01756177]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



A decent minidisc and a good mic can indeed provide pristine
results. FIrst of tho, you have to record at highest
quality. Secondly, the best microphone for portable
recording would be a portable electret condenser. I use a
sony ECM-MS907.

With microphones, tho you might want to look at what
frequency range you are planning on recording. If you are
looking to record the lowest bass sounds, then you might
want something with a lower frequency range than 100Hz
(which is an acceptible standard for this kind of
microphone), which is the low frequency range of the mic I
just suggested. Otherwise, for anything else its perfect.
Fits in your pocket. Sounds immaculate.

Sony

Otherwise, there is this little bad boy that I have heard
good things about, altho still haven't gotten around to
ordering one to try out. Delta mic on paper, its nearly
the same thing as the other link, only is frequency range is
lower, allowing you to capture the lowest of basses.
although I would suggest an extention, because otherwise it
will pick up all the sounds that the minidisc recorder makes
while recording.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-10-21 05:32 [#01756191]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Taxidermist: #01756177 | Show recordbag



Thanks for your tips taxi, re: stopping the sounds of the MD
operating being recorded, is there any use "unsulating" the
minidisc player inside, say, a small carpet bag to help
prevent that?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-10-21 05:36 [#01756196]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01756191 | Show recordbag



...by "unsulating", I do of course mean,
"insulating". :)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-10-21 06:32 [#01756242]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



hey, check this out. It just came out recently.

MicroTrack

could be a good answer


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-10-21 09:44 [#01756530]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01756242



Oh coool.


 


Messageboard index