Last post by... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 544 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Last post by...
 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-05 07:35 [#01018639]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I recently discovered that if you hover the mouse over a
thread on the main index, it tells you who the last post was
by.. Good thinkin Phob. ;) Anyone else not notice this?


 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-05 07:37 [#01018641]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker



about 4 months ago...
why is everyone obsessed with cats


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-01-05 07:38 [#01018642]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



i did notice but i didn't notice that you didn't notice


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-01-05 07:38 [#01018643]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to aphextriplet: #01018641



mine is a dog


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-01-05 07:39 [#01018646]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



It's only been like that for the best part of three decades.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-01-05 07:40 [#01018647]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



yearrs ago mate


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-05 07:42 [#01018648]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to aphextriplet: #01018641 | Show recordbag



I don't have a fixation with cats, but you can't deny that
this one IS the Zephyr Twin... It's a plural that is
somehow singular... 2 heads on one body, does that
constitute a twin? Damn right it does! BAM!


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-05 07:45 [#01018650]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01018647 | Show recordbag



bah, you haven't even been here for years. =P

I knew most people would know about it, which is why I asked
"anyone else not notice this?" :) What can I say, I'm
quick to the draw when it comes to clicking on threads, no
need to dilly-dally with the mouse. That's why it took so
long for me to notice. :]


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-01-05 07:47 [#01018653]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



It SHOULD be a column by its own. I can't always get the
tooltip up.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-05 07:48 [#01018657]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i noticed...i thought it was always there too


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-01-05 07:50 [#01018659]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



I only noticed that a few months ago, v handy.

alot of other message boards tell you how many times the
thread has been viewd too. watmm for example. I don't gain
much from that peronally though

I really like the way this message board is layed out. Very
please to the eye


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-01-05 07:52 [#01018662]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to pOgO: #01018659



no i find it prretty pointless too.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-05 07:56 [#01018668]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



yeah, it's nice to see how many times it was viewd...at
least that way you can see that thread you make and gets no
replys is not only visable to you :)


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2004-01-05 08:00 [#01018671]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



anyone else Not notice the little black dot in the bottom
left corner of this site? its incredulous!


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-05 08:01 [#01018673]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



it's there for a reason


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-05 08:04 [#01018682]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #01018671 | Show recordbag



i always assumed it was just a spec on my monitor. Not that
I ever noticed it before, but had I, that's what I would
have thought. hehe :D


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-01-05 08:04 [#01018683]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



yeah, if it wasn't therre what would you have to talk about,
Bob Mcbob?


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-01-05 08:13 [#01018701]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01018673




yup

ever see The Net with Sandra Bullock?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-05 08:15 [#01018708]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to pOgO: #01018701



the net?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-05 08:16 [#01018710]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to pOgO: #01018701



god that film SUCKS!!


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-05 08:16 [#01018712]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



p0g0: that movie was so terrible! it was pretty funny
though..... in how inacurate it is/was. or now especially
since its so outdated.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-05 08:20 [#01018725]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



the one where she's in a role of some computer hecker or
something? i saw it but it was shite...


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-05 08:23 [#01018729]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



tolystoyed: thats the one. and yes it does suck.


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2004-01-05 08:38 [#01018753]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



all sandra bullock films are great because sandra bullock is
great. (sic)


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-05 08:39 [#01018756]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



sandra bullocks is bullobunk.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-05 08:41 [#01018760]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #01018753 | Show recordbag



Only Fire on the Amazon was anywhere near great. And the
only reason for that was becaue she nearly showed her
tits. How the fuck can you have a sex scene in a film and
NOT show some Tits!!!!!!!! DAMN THEM!


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-05 08:41 [#01018761]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



ever see a monk wildly fucked by two teenage girls?


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-01-05 08:41 [#01018762]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



i love herr perrsonally.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-05 08:52 [#01018784]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Jarworski: #01018761 | Show recordbag



seen it?! try being the monk!


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-05 08:52 [#01018785]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01018784 | Show recordbag



or the teenage girls... either way, my hope is that you'll
go out and try something new.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-05 08:53 [#01018787]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



the monk's perspective is wildly overrated, trust me.


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-01-05 09:40 [#01018846]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



it was a pretty crappy film, but there's this little thing
that she clicks on that takes her into all this hacking info
and shit or something like that


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-05 09:46 [#01018851]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to pOgO: #01018846



.


Attached picture

 


Messageboard index