don't quit your day job | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 262 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
don't quit your day job
 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-16 12:47 [#00994179]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



so what does everyone think about Jega having to take a day
job because of alleged mp3 downloading?

quoting from here about why 'variance' isn't out yet:
1) Dylan could probably have got this to you ages ago,
but the volumes that artistic integrity sell, particularly
when a significant portion of you go with soulseek rather
than shelling out the dough, mean he has to take a day job.
He is currently working on it more or less full time. The
essence of what you like about Dylan is what takes him so
long to get stuff to you - no compromise.


how many other artists that you think are well known do you
suppose have to work day jobs? Cabbog (R.I.P.!) once told me
about how the cylobe (not cylob) folks work in a gay sex
shop or something like that to make enough money just to get
by. i know Matmos still work in a sound art museum but i
think they do it for fun? i mean they have all that "bjork
cash" now. i bet a lot of electronic artists don't make
enough $ to live off of, but i think jega was a bit
surprising even for me.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-16 12:54 [#00994190]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



its why i think idm is not promoted enough!

musicians like jega have to work and posers like robbie
williams enjoy their millions.
major record companies should cut some profit off of biggest
stars and put some money into smaller labels!


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-16 12:58 [#00994196]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Ray Keith one of the best known drum and bass DJ's/producers
has always worked in Black Market records because he doesn't
earn enough from records, and this was before the internet
got big. And lets face it, without the internet he probably
wouldn't have got the attention to sell even one record
internationally. It's a two way thing. There are only a
few of the really well known electronic artists who can
liveon sales alone...the rest of them have to do the whole
DJ/live thing to suppliment their income.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-16 13:02 [#00994206]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00994196



but isnt it interesting how some trance/techno/house dj's
get like 3000 EUR for the gig, and electronica artists get
like 500-1000...not to speak of robbie who probably get
500.000 for two hours


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-16 13:04 [#00994213]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



stuntrock has a day job, i'm not sure what he does though.
he sits at a computer all day though and answers email all
the time cause he's bored


 

offline azatoth233 from tku (Finland) on 2003-12-16 13:05 [#00994214]
Points: 387 Status: Regular



i'm sure that alot of the artists on the smaller labels
wouldnt sell as many records without p2p-sharing. personally
i have found alot of artists and bought their albums thanks
to p2p.


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-16 13:05 [#00994215]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



chevron waits tables


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-16 13:08 [#00994221]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #00994206 | Show recordbag



In general dance DJ's get shit loads of money for being good
looking and having a huge ego nothing to do with music. I
think it is wrong, but that's just the way it is.

Anyway you are supposed to suffer for your art...that is why
so many artists who "have made it" just start releasing
shite. :D


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-16 13:12 [#00994229]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



paul oakenfold once got like $20K in one night

for playing OTHER peoples records


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-16 13:17 [#00994237]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



another example, cex works in a record shop, but then again
he's about 21 or 22 so he should be working in a record shop
anyway, especially with the albums he's been releasing
lately.

really i'm asking about people that have to take day jobs
just to pay the bills. dj'ing and playing live shows are
largely "night jobs" but more importantly, they're a part of
being an artist.. a lot of artists enjoy it, some like it
even more than creating albums.

so what other so-called "big names" work day jobs other than
running a label or playing/dj'ing live?


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-12-16 13:26 [#00994256]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"musicians like jega have to work and posers like robbie
williams enjoy their millions.
"

Yeah but that's just a matter of supply and demand (sp?).
Alot more people are interested in what Robbie has to
offer, than that there are people who are interested in
Jega. I doubt this would change even if Jega was heavily
promoted. Robbie just gives the masses what they want, so he
makes a shitload of money. Good for him.

If Jega really had to get a day job because of people
downloading his music instead of buying it, then i
think that's really sad.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2003-12-16 13:27 [#00994264]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



I think max tundra temps... at least according to the lyrics
on mastered by guy at the exchange.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-16 13:28 [#00994268]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00994256



well-said; i don't think jega should be outselling robbie
williams, or le tigre outselling TATU, or paris outselling
the black eyed peas.. there's obviously an audience for
artistically watered down, SIMPLE music (with decent to
great melodies and production even if the lyrics are vapid),
it can't all be marketing (what a naive, ego-bloated
excuse).


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-12-16 13:33 [#00994277]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



vSnares is helping to fund my revolution


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-16 13:37 [#00994288]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



well, it would make a big difference if electronica artists
would be better promoted...electronic music (techno,
house...included) in general is pretty popular and idm (and
other non mainstream genres) isnt all that different, so i
really cant see why people wouldnt start liking it. most of
people that listened to some music i recommended obviously
liked it, but they would probably never hear anything if
they'd be waiting to get something in the stores or to hear
it on mtv.
i dont know how it is in the states, but europe in general
doesnt give a fuck about idm. in uk there's a totally
different story, music is quite well presented thus more
popular - if it was at least that popular in other countries
many idm musicians wouldnt have to work for a living.


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-12-16 13:38 [#00994294]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00994256



Good for him? No! Robbie Williams must BURN.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-12-16 13:45 [#00994310]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #00994288



Well I haven't actually ever heard anything by Jega :-p So
I'm not sure if i can comment. But still... I highly doubt
there would be such a huge market for it, or other
idm-music. Ofcourse if it were heavily promoted it would
sell more. But not that much more (i think). It's mostly
just too weird or difficult. You can't really compare it to
house or techno. From what i've heard on the radio
techno-music usually has a very simple beat, and an even
more simple and catchy melody to support it.

"there's obviously an audience for
artistically watered down, SIMPLE music
"

Well i'd agree that often the simple music becomes more
popular, but i'm not sure i agree with the "artistically
watered down" part. Writing a good popsong is probably just
as much an art as writing a good idm-track. The fact that it
seems simple shows it's genius.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-12-16 13:51 [#00994331]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to DJ Xammax: #00994294



lol, no. I actually think robbie is alright. He's alot more
courageous, entertaining and funny that alot of other
mtv-popstars. I think the swing-album in particular was
quite a commercial risk, and i respect him for releasing it.
Which was apparantly a lifelong dream of his. I even quite
liked it.

Alot of his other songs really aren't that bad either. Have
you ever really listened to it? "Feel" is a classic.
Seriously. In 20 years time that song will still be played
on the radio. My brother has his latest album, and it really
isn't so bad. "Me and my monkey" kicks ass :-p


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-16 13:57 [#00994346]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00994310



a lot of what's popular is artistically watered down, i
didn't mean to say that it's ALL that way. also, you can
have a really catchy song that is barely artistic. art, not
to delve into the dreaded "faggotry" here, is about creating
something original and meaningful. you can write a terrific
pop song (amazing melody, totally fun style) that is
completely insincere and written just to make money or be
popular. think about engineering vs. creating. are engineers
artists? not necessarily. they may be able to technically
craft something of extremely high calibre but if it doesn't
resonate on an emotional level after the song (or movie,
story, tv show......) is over then it's not very artistic.
"IMO"


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-16 13:58 [#00994351]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00994346



I getcha, you mean like Drukqs?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-16 14:01 [#00994359]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00994346 | Show recordbag



but just because it doesn't resonate on an emotional level
for you doesn't mean it doesn't for the creator.

I have a friend who makes dance music...shitty dance music,
really basic four to the floor shit...but he loves it, he
gets so excited over it. If I was a stranger listening to
it I would think cheesy crap, but I know how much it means
to him and you just have to appreciate it.

For me being artistic is creating something out of emotion
regardless of what the final product is.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-16 14:04 [#00994363]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #00994351 | Show recordbag



I'd go with that...most of Drukqs feels a bit emotionally
sterile compared to his other releases. It just seemed like
he was going through the motions.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-16 14:05 [#00994364]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #00994351



no comment :)

---
braindance backwards, that is a good point but i think you
know i wasn't talking about four to the floor techno.

likewise, if you have artistic aspirations (and that doesn't
mean something fey like i'm setting out to create the
loveliest softest ambient music ever, it could be i want to
make something that will shit out your intestines) but the
finished product is a failure for yourself the artist as
well as most listeners, i'm not saying that's artistically
watered down. it may suck but at least the spirit was there.
i'm obviously talking about music that is aimed at the
charts and at wealthy demographics like the kid sister daddy
gave $60 to spend at the mall.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-16 14:11 [#00994369]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00994364 | Show recordbag



yep I know what you mean...and this next comment isn't aimed
at you...there just seems to be a lot of people on the board
who try to discredit other peoples work purely because it
doesn't do anything for them.

The $60 daddys isn't going out to buy music anyway, she is
trying to buy style or an image marketed to her through the
so called "music industry"...music has just become a piggy
back for marketing sex to kids and teens.


 


Messageboard index