|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-16 07:39 [#00993745]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
...and they're gonna start making a non-free version!!
"America Online is expected to release an upgrade for its free Winamp multimedia software [read: Winamp5] as early as Tuesday, with a fee-based "pro" version that does MP3 encoding to follow, according to sources familiar with the plans."
i sense the beginning of the end for the dopest audio player this side of hades
|
|
Dolleater
from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-12-16 07:40 [#00993746]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict
|
|
owned?
|
|
diablo
on 2003-12-16 07:43 [#00993752]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
bummer
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-16 07:44 [#00993753]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dolleater: #00993746
|
|
pwned.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-16 07:58 [#00993776]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
oh yeah... and, it looks like Winamp5 is an official release now.
...pro is $14.95
|
|
Aphexisatwin
from your mom's room (United States) on 2003-12-16 08:02 [#00993782]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular
|
|
ouch :/ looks like it's WMA for me, now
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-16 08:05 [#00993783]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Aphexisatwin: #00993782
|
|
there's still a free version of winamp
|
|
Gwely Mernans
from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2003-12-16 08:05 [#00993784]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker
|
|
i dont know if this is AIM or AOL but its funny as hell, check it here
|
|
bob
from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-16 08:20 [#00993801]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker
|
|
itunes is free to download. what more could you possibly want?
|
|
oxygenfad
from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2003-12-16 09:40 [#00993963]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular
|
|
I never went past winamp 2....
Ill just burn the install onto disc.
|
|
Oddioblender
from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-16 09:47 [#00993969]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker
|
|
wait wait....
I am supporting AOL by using WinAmp?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2003-12-16 17:16 [#00994699]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah, that guy who started winamp got fired or quit or something right after they released 3.0, i think. and that was right after aol took over. that's why i haven't downloaded winamp since 2.x!
|
|
kochlear
from aud-stim.com on 2003-12-16 17:21 [#00994703]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict
|
|
the media player that comes with xp is so much better than any external programs anyway.
|
|
hedphukkerr
from mathbotton (United States) on 2003-12-16 17:39 [#00994724]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular
|
|
i feel bad supporting aol, but i gotta say that winamp 5 is the best winamp so far in my opinion. all the features of 3 plus more, minus the laggyness and crashing and screwed up playlist shit and all that. i feel so dirty....
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-16 19:34 [#00994830]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
itunes is better
|
|
spoonz
from Edmonton, AB (Canada) on 2003-12-16 19:35 [#00994834]
Points: 3219 Status: Regular
|
|
2.78-2.80 = still the best versions.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-16 20:05 [#00994863]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
AOL has been behind Winamp from the start, no?
I'm using 5.0 now, it's slick. I'm still keeping 2.91 around though.
I've also been checking out foobar 2000, a very cool mp3 player. Extremely light on system resources, supposed to handle large playlists well. Plays just about every file format, lots of tweaks for power users, mostly open source with BSD license.
|
|
Sanguine
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-12-16 20:06 [#00994866]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker
|
|
Um... 5.0 kicks MAJOR ASS
Slick as 2.0 (which is all I would use before) with the features of 3.0, I LOVE this release, I don't care who owns it
|
|
Asche XL
on 2003-12-16 20:19 [#00994876]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
THEY'RE NOT TAKING MY 2.6!!!
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-16 22:48 [#00994960]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
2.6? 2.8???
ddudes, get winamp 2.91.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-16 22:48 [#00994963]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
oh... and FUCK AOL!
|
|
heliosphan
from Australia on 2003-12-16 23:08 [#00994994]
Points: 42 Status: Regular
|
|
aol = lol = very old news
|
|
nlogax
from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-12-16 23:38 [#00995022]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular
|
|
there's a patch to upgrade winamp5 to pro version. obviously
|
|
Gwely Mernans
from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2003-12-16 23:38 [#00995023]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #00993784
|
|
check out my link below
NOW
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2003-12-17 02:18 [#00995101]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
I just use media jukebox. Best audio player I've every used. Plus is uses winamp 2.x plugins and I think visualizations. Go with version 8 though, 9 sucks and I think the site still offers downloads of 8.
|
|
nlogax
from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-12-17 03:51 [#00995145]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular
|
|
fuk The requested URL /winamp/client/winamp50_full.exe was not found on this server.
|
|
EnsconcE
from Grunn (Netherlands, The) on 2003-12-17 08:52 [#00995419]
Points: 51 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00994863
|
|
foobar is cool, it uses a 64 bit floating point decoder, in normal language it means that the music comes out much better then wmp or winamp
winamp isn't going to die, the pro version is because nullsoft can live and they cab invest in a better music player. the extra fucntions you will gain are cd burning and faster ripping. be honest, you don't want winamp to do that unless you like to donate some money to nullsoft.
Winamp 5
and the newest in de 2.x series is 2.95.
i am using winamp 5 right now and i am very satisfied, hardly any difference with the 2.x serie, the most noticable difference is the skin function from winamp 3.x
|
|
Messageboard index
|