so, this is how it goes? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 480 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614093
Today 6
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
so, this is how it goes?
 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-12-08 15:54 [#00982356]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



no we don't, sadly. maybe in the future.


 

offline soon from the moon and 2002-07-30 12:55 on 2003-12-08 15:57 [#00982358]
Points: 227 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00982258



"a label ain't a label with no distribution"

and a "radio show" is nothing without listeners


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-08 15:57 [#00982359]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to soon: #00982358



that might hurt my feelings if it remotely made sense


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2003-12-08 15:59 [#00982362]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



I made a pledge to eat halal meat.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-12-08 16:03 [#00982373]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



reflex thank you for showing your support with your avatar.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-12-08 16:03 [#00982375]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



reflex is a true friend of stim, not some joccoite liek
laserbeak!!!!


 

offline soon from the moon and 2002-07-30 12:55 on 2003-12-08 16:06 [#00982382]
Points: 227 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00982359



so then you get the point?

Web Labels as they tend to be called host a varity of things
weather it be free mp3s or CD-R's or what have you.

In this case as i have checked to find it contains free
mp3s. So the distribution would be the people that download
it and share it with others. Should that be via slsk or
another p2p or even with friends that has yet to be seen.

In essence that would be a form of distribution. It's more
appealing to others because these are not well known
artists.

If for example they charged for these releases I myself
probably wouldn't bother as i haven't heard much from them.
Through free releases, if they do eventually get signed i
might be more prone to actually buy something from one of
them, as i would be more firmiliar with the said artist.

I think i went on a tangent here.....

hmm


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-12-08 16:07 [#00982387]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



soon: i think you made your point quite well, actually. :)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-12-08 16:24 [#00982421]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to soon: #00982382



yea but my point wasn't that i didn't understand what
they're doing, just that people who are dedicated and
talented (and it does take talent to coordinate it all)
enough to do it shouldn't call it a "label" because the term
is misleading. it's similar but the things i mentioned
before (including distribution to stores and/or online
realtors) make it not a label in the traditional sense. i
guess "web label" is an ok description except that with
label in there you still have that connotation of an
official (ie: legally established) company (not a collective
of internet artists) who aim to sell cd's. i don't think you
can be a real label and never press any commercial copies of
an album and i'm undecided on whether a label that sells
mp3's (ie: pay to download) as their entire means of
reaching an audience is a label or not. this is just my
opinion and like i said it's all about the definition of
what a "label" is.

the radio show analogy didn't make sense because if you're
at a radio station broadcasting, even if no one, absolutely
zero people, was tuned in, it's still a show because you're
playing music and transmitting it into the air waves. but
with a broadcast range of about 50,000 people and an
infinite number over web radio it's almost impossible that
no one at all is listening, so the analogy was ill suited to
the argument and just generally didn't parallel what i was
saying at all.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-12-08 16:33 [#00982433]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



well it's nice to have that cleared up.

however we have declared war on bryce_berny/lasertooth and
there will at least be a few months of ridiculously long
posts and photoshoppery to document this war.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-12-08 17:33 [#00982475]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to kochlear: #00982433



cool.

can I take pictures?


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-12-08 17:49 [#00982485]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #00982475



sure.


 

offline big from lsg on 2003-12-08 18:00 [#00982493]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



on another note: isnt it the record company that does the
selling and distribution (if that's not done by a
distribution company) for a lable that's under them.
and the label get the signies and, i dont know, help them
with this and that.
on another sider note: you could go on a philosophical trip
with: does a radio show (not a literal broadcast) exist if
no-one hears it ?
maybe i ought to go to bed


 

offline jennysaid from Canada on 2003-12-08 19:33 [#00982573]
Points: 46 Status: Regular



Oh, wonderful. That's uh, nice. Thank you?!


 

offline jennysaid from Canada on 2003-12-08 19:36 [#00982574]
Points: 46 Status: Regular



(That was.. ugh. That was for he person who called me a
psycho. I can't... remember the username and I am far too
lazy to go back and check.)


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-08 19:52 [#00982580]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



Welcome jenny, to this world of maladjusted psychopaths...
where in Canada do you live? (pardon if you are afraid that
i am going to hunt you down and kill you... rest assured i
won't... but i understand if you don't want to be anymore
specific than you already have)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-08 19:54 [#00982581]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeadEight: #00982580



he can be at your door in ten minutes if you're in edmonton


 

offline jennysaid from Canada on 2003-12-08 19:54 [#00982582]
Points: 46 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #00982580



Just outside of Calgary, actually.


 

offline jennysaid from Canada on 2003-12-08 19:55 [#00982583]
Points: 46 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #00982581



Yep, not anywhere near it. About 3 hours, I think. That's
far too long to even make any effort. Well, if you're
anything like me... it is.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-08 20:06 [#00982597]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



cool... i was born and raised in Calgary... then i moved to
Edmonton,and i've been here for 8 years... but i do visit my
parents there... so watch yourself (here's where you're
supposed to insert an emoticon to clarify the "jokingness"
of the comment... but i feel like a loser when i do them...
not because i think they're lame, but really, because
everything i do is stupid on some level)


 

offline jennysaid from Canada on 2003-12-08 20:09 [#00982603]
Points: 46 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #00982597



I was also born and raised in Calgary. I was there for 12
years, and I've been here for almost 7 years. Yay for small
hick towns that make you want to shoot your feet off!


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-08 20:13 [#00982610]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



could be worse... i think that if Edmonton and Calgary
combined, we could have a pretty decent city... but i reckon
it'll take at least another 20 years before they've sprawled
into one another... in the meantime, i have my eye on
Montreal or Vancouver...


 


Messageboard index