Straight / Gay / Bi | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 655 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Straight / Gay / Bi
 

offline mimi on 2003-11-24 11:52 [#00963596]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



I don't agree with absolutely everything Theo is saying, I'm
sure there are the rare few who will fuck anything that
walks with no preference what's between the knees, but he's
got a way better argument than you guys are giving him.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 11:55 [#00963598]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to zaphod: #00963582 | Show recordbag



That's exactly what his argument is. And since he won't hear
any reason on the subject, I say we start a poll.

All who believe that ALL bi-sexuals are pretending, type
"1"

All who believe that theo himself is a total moron and is
full of shit, type "2"

-2-


 

offline mimi on 2003-11-24 11:56 [#00963599]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00963598



listen to yourself.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-24 11:57 [#00963600]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



{2}


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-24 11:57 [#00963601]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00963600



Jesus I'm bored


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-24 11:58 [#00963602]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict



theo would you be as kind as to repeat your opinions about
bisexual people for the 14th time, you might convince me
this time with your good arguments

or maybe not


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 11:59 [#00963604]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



do you expect me to even acknowledge that comment? do you
honestly think I'd ever shut up because some agorophobe in
stockholm told me to on a message board? and please, you
don't fucking know me, so you don't know what a 'cunt like
me' would do .. you know nothing about me. fuck off.

bisexuals are gay or straight people following the
"trisexual" cliche. that's it. there are people who claim
they are bisexual, yes, but it's dishonest. they're in
denial of one of the two attractions. or they're doing it
for show/fun. end of story. period. do everyone a favor and
just shut up because we don't like it when people make us
feel wrong/stupid. I'm glad I pissed you off.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 12:00 [#00963605]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #00963596 | Show recordbag



And that argument would be....?

I am listening to myself

By reason I meant "any other sides to an argument" not that
my logic is the only that can be consider "reason". His
argument is that "Bisexuals are attention whores and lyers
and arent genuinely attracted to both sexes" Or did you miss
that?


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-24 12:00 [#00963606]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to theo himself: #00963604



thanks

didn't work though


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-11-24 12:01 [#00963607]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to theo himself: #00963604



please do that again

you're turning me on


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:02 [#00963609]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



zephyr.. for that poll can I do 1 & 2?


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 12:04 [#00963610]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to theo himself: #00963609 | Show recordbag



You can do it however you like it's just a poll. (although
may I suggest that lovely number 2)


 

offline mimi on 2003-11-24 12:04 [#00963612]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00963605



I am just saying, he's got a right to be pissed the way you
guys are trying to argue. No, you're wrong, period --
that's not an argument.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:07 [#00963613]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



not one person here can name a homoheterosexual that has
sustained that orientation through and through. at one point
or another, they chalk it up to dorm-room experimentation, a
drug-induced haze, E, or straight up sex.. available sex..
hey!-I-remember-that-dream-I-had-@-age-15-that-made-me-kind
I-want-to-try-this sex.. I-wonder-what-this-is-like sex..
-of-uneasy,-I-wonder-if-there's-anything-to-that sex..

anne heche.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-11-24 12:07 [#00963614]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #00963612



come on play along


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:08 [#00963616]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



oh ok I was just wondering if I could go both ways.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-24 12:08 [#00963617]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00963616



oh clever you


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 12:09 [#00963618]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #00963612 | Show recordbag



You're right, that's NOT an argument, and it's precisely the
one that Theo began using first.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:09 [#00963619]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



hey!-I-remember-that-dream-I-had-@-age-15-that-made-me-k
ind-of-uneasy,-I-wonder-if-there's-anything-to-that sex..


..that is


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-11-24 12:10 [#00963620]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to theo himself: #00963619



dont even bother to correct it, noone really reads your
posts


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:10 [#00963621]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



no.. that's not true. people got all outraged and told me
how WRONG I was.. so I had to retort in a similarly
closed-minded and insulting manner... and there you have it


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:11 [#00963622]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular | Followup to JAroen: #00963620



yeah you've all made that abundantly clear today.

it's time for you to go somewhere else.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-11-24 12:12 [#00963624]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to theo himself: #00963622



i cant heaaaaaarrrrr you

*puts fingers in ears and makes funny face


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-24 12:14 [#00963627]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



I wonder how many bi-sexual (waiving all disscussion of
whether they *really* are *bi*-sexual or not) end up going
straight when they decide to finally settle down with
someone permanently due to the fact that then they'll be
able to have kids...


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-11-24 12:18 [#00963629]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



come on theo its been 7 minutes since you last posted

I WANT TO BE ENTERTAINED


 

offline nlogax from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-11-24 12:18 [#00963630]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular | Followup to theo himself: #00963621



you're the one throwing "fuck-you's" all over the place.

quote: you're a fucking idiot. :unquote


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:19 [#00963631]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



oh. right. because they could NEVER find someone to have
kids with if in a homosexual relationship. you've clearly
worked out all the points on this one. good job champ!


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-24 12:21 [#00963634]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00963631



wtf? If in a faithfull permanent and gay realtionship, no
they couldn't. By 'have kids' I mean that the kid is the
product of THIER union. Obviously


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2003-11-24 12:25 [#00963636]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to theo himself: #00963613



yeah, sorry i called you a retard, that would be insulting
to a whole class of people who are smarter than you.
perhaps fucktard is a better word.
anyway, your argument is pretty tired at this point, as, not
only are you generalizing about an entire portion of the
population, you're attempting to define their sexuality in
terms of youth oriented experimentation, as opposed to any
basis in biological fact, which is the only argument i find
valid if you're going to attempt to refute an entire group
of people based on the idea that you don't think they should
fool around with members of both sexes.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-11-24 12:31 [#00963641]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00963008



OK, so a lot's happened since the post I'm replying to,
stuff I haven't yet read, but that has to be one of the most
dumbass things I've read this side of Italia'90 ;D


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 12:33 [#00963643]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00963641 | Show recordbag



ugh, dont get him started again. We've been through this
already, read the posts. =p


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2003-11-24 12:33 [#00963644]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



I'm a tomato!


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-11-24 12:35 [#00963645]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Amnesiac: #00963242



Hey, another dumb post :D

Trust me, as a bisexual man, you *can* like the cock and the
pussy at the same time.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 12:35 [#00963646]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to raimons: #00963644 | Show recordbag



Is this the triumphant return of raimons??? I haven't seen
you around here in a while. WB if so. Nice avatar.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-11-24 12:38 [#00963650]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00963357



You sir, are a complete muppet. If you believe people are
born only homo or hetero you're sadly mistaken. Nature
doesn't deal in absolutes.


 

offline nlogax from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-11-24 12:41 [#00963653]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00963650



interesting reading huh, dan?
personally, I'm gonna save this thread and use it when I'm
feeling down.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2003-11-24 12:42 [#00963655]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



Ok theo, I know people that have orgys with everyone. And
that doesn't necessarly mean that it is just dick in vagina
sex. These folks fuck and grab and fondle everything because
it is an orgy.

They have no care who is getting what off where or who is
sticking what where they are all just fucking. They don't
bring it up for attention or brag about it. It is just
something they do.

The only reason I know is because I got invited. That is
bi-sexual. IMO


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:43 [#00963656]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



you're gay


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2003-11-24 12:45 [#00963659]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00963656



nope i turned it down which would probably mean i am
straight as i only like girls.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:50 [#00963669]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I wasn't talking to you, actually.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2003-11-24 12:55 [#00963678]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00963669



oh i thought you labeled me gay by association! :P


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 12:56 [#00963682]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



right.. but all the individuals involved are all either gay
or straight.. and getting everyone together for this big ..
err clusterfuck (FLOABT).. is part of the fun involved in
such a thing.. there are usually drugs.. amyl etc available
to loosen everybody up.. they goto work the next day
confident that nothing about them has changed.. and ob-la-di


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-11-24 13:01 [#00963693]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



The truth is that everyone is bisexual, but most most people
are at the near-heterosexual end of the scale and the
numbers taper downwards to near-homosexual.

As much as Theo seems to think bisexuality doesn't exist, I
don't think 100% hetero and homosexuality exist, 99.99999%
maybe, but if we're honest, we've all seen some small
attraction in someone of the 'wrong' gender at one time or
another.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-24 13:04 [#00963697]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00963693



exactly


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 13:19 [#00963712]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I could go either way on this (no pun intended) that we're
all standing on the fulcrum of a sexual balance.. or we're
either one thing or the other.. I have reason to believe
both.. but the amount of fullofshit bisexuals I've seen
pushes me towards the latter.. the evident attracttion and
forced repression of such attractions to the other sex
pushes me back to the former.. and all the other things I've
said that lit a fire under the ass of all these
non-bisexuals (curiously enough) are arguments, again, for
the latter.. no one can say for sure. but I am very
suspicious of alleged bisexuals


 

offline Tropa from Helsinki (Finland) on 2003-11-24 13:20 [#00963715]
Points: 308 Status: Lurker



" Central to many of these texts are questions of identity,
a concept which "bisexuals have alternately clung to and
shrunk from,'' in Kathleen Bennett's words. Many bi's locate
themselves on a continuum between straight and gay. A point
which, for some, is not fixed: during a lifetime one's same
or other sex attraction can increase (having gone from het
to bi in middle age, this has been the case with me). This
fluidity is itself seen as threatening by 'essentialist'
outlooks which are common in the gay and lesbian milieux,
theories which posit identity as an innate, unchanging
essence from which many of us are said to be alienated; to
become whole, we must rediscover our lost essence, our true
identity. Concerning sexual orientation this easily leads to
dismissing 10 years of pleasurable het sex as a state of
false consciousness."

- BISEXUALITY
Review by Michael...



 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 13:26 [#00963723]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



right.. a gay guy dates straight women.. to play along w/
convention and not have to deal with the pressures of being
outed.. later he gets more comfortable w/ himself and goes
for jeffrey.. but doesnt want to alienate the people he
spent so many forced years trying to win over.. so he keeps
the girls on a backburner.. so that no one assumes TOO much

I think the more people become comfortable with homosxty.,
the less bisexuality you'll see.. that will more than likely
happen, and you don't have to stand on the 'you're either
gay or your straight' side of things to realize that.. think
about it


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 13:34 [#00963735]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to theo himself: #00963723 | Show recordbag



You're still not considering the fact that there are
bisexuals out there who love the pussy AND the cock.
Maybe there will be a slight decrease as people become more
accepting of homosexuality, but there will always "real
live" bisexuals. Don't sweat it man, sooner or later you'll
figure it out.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-24 13:34 [#00963736]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00963735 | Show recordbag



that first bisexuals is meant to say "people"

obviously bisexuals love the pussy and the cock.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-11-24 13:43 [#00963751]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



there's nothing I need to figure out. don't fucking talk to
me like that. if you've been reading, you'd know that I'm
aware that people might find immediate pleasure in both
orif- genders.. but somethign MIGHT be panging within.. they
like one more than the other (a lot more than hte other)
they are trying to fool themselves.. they might be trying to
fool others.. all of those are possibilities.. undeniable
possibilities..


 


Messageboard index