wait, wait, | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 335 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
wait, wait,
 

offline happy cycling from berlin on 2003-11-16 22:52 [#00952816]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular



are there people here who actually read everything?? like
caught up on every thread present and future?


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-11-16 22:54 [#00952819]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



i wouldn't be surprised


 

offline happy cycling from berlin on 2003-11-16 22:56 [#00952820]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular



the possbility just occured in my stoned self.


 

offline optimus prime on 2003-11-16 22:58 [#00952822]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker



yeah i read threads from the future.


 

offline bryce_berny from chronno (Canada) on 2003-11-16 23:41 [#00952857]
Points: 1568 Status: Lurker



*unleashes the data mining future thread conjecture probe*
I know everything about all of you!



 

offline soon from the moon and 2002-07-30 12:55 on 2003-11-16 23:44 [#00952860]
Points: 227 Status: Regular



no, but there is a cheatsheet at the end of this MB.

turn to thread 31043 and all the answers are right there so
you can't go wrong! :D


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-11-17 02:46 [#00952973]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



i read 80% of all posts........everyday i start from the
last post i read the day before then work my way up to most
recent, i suck :(


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-11-17 02:48 [#00952975]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



I ignore the drug ones, and the threads about peoples
music... and others!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-11-17 02:57 [#00952979]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Let's say even if reading each post takes only 20 seconds to
read on average (probably a lot more than that- taking into
consideration, the occasional paragraph of text, reading
some posts twice, trying to "find your place" in an already
visited theread etc.), that means to read all messages on
here, it'd take over 200 days (ie 24 hours) solidly reading
to get through it all.

So, I'd say no one here has read all posts on the
board.


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2003-11-17 03:05 [#00952982]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00952973



Holy mother!


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-11-17 03:09 [#00952983]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



I do the same as aquagak but ignore any threads with tricky
titles


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-11-17 03:15 [#00952985]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



i'm now compiling each and every thread into a novel that i
will pass off as my own work.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2003-11-17 09:56 [#00953463]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #00952985



That is genius!


 

offline Jaysuz Jones from Wasaga Beach (Canada) on 2003-11-17 10:45 [#00953530]
Points: 888 Status: Addict



*runs to thread #31043*


 


Messageboard index